It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Pope Benedict to deliver 'intense' message during Fatima visit
"Fatima is a particularly significant place for this Pope," said Vatican spokesman Fr. Federico Lombardi on Tuesday, noting that it was also a destination for two former Popes. The Holy Father has a thorough knowledge of the history of the Marian sanctuary, he added.
Fr. Lombardi held a press conference at the Vatican to prepare the media for the Pope's next trip out of the Vatican. He will be visiting Portugal from May 11-14.
The spokesman referred to the Pope's stop in Fatima on May 13 as the highlight and "heart" of the upcoming four-day trip to Portugal, according to Vatican Radio. But, he pointed out, Benedict XVI will not be the first Pope to visit the Marian shrine.
The Portuguese shrine is not unfamiliar to Pope Benedict, since as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger extensively studied the message of Fatima. Fr. Lombardi said on Tuesday that the Pope has been involved with history of the Marian sanctuary in a "very deep, personal way."
It was him, for example, who was called upon to give a theological perspective when the third secret of Fatima was made public in 2000.
The Vatican spokesman said that the Holy Father will also deliver an intense message during his Fatima visit. Upon his arrival at the sanctuary on May 12, he will remember John Paul II and the 29th anniversary of the assassination attempt that nearly took his life on May 13, 1981.
Read more: CNA
Originally posted by Crossfate
First thing I thought when I read this headline was "DISCLOSURE!!!! YESSSS!!!" then my logic kicked in and slapped me back into my intellect.
Still hoping....
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
Who knows.
Maybe it's just something like the Pope finally admitting he's not "infallible". Something it seems the rest of the world has known for ages, but Archbishops and Popes never seemed to realize.
Perhaps saying that "Yes, I the Pope can make mistakes. I am not really perfect" is earth-shaking and "intense" for them. Just not to us.
Vatican II explained the doctrine of infallibility as follows: "Although the individual bishops do not enjoy the prerogative of infallibility, they can nevertheless proclaim Christ’s doctrine infallibly. This is so, even when they are dispersed around the world, provided that while maintaining the bond of unity among themselves and with Peter’s successor, and while teaching authentically on a matter of faith or morals, they concur in a single viewpoint as the one which must be held conclusively. This authority is even more clearly verified when, gathered together in an ecumenical council, they are teachers and judges of faith and morals for the universal Church. Their definitions must then be adhered to with the submission of faith" (Lumen Gentium 25).
Infallibility belongs in a special way to the pope as head of the bishops (Matt. 16:17–19; John 21:15–17). As Vatican II remarked, it is a charism the pope "enjoys in virtue of his office, when, as the supreme shepherd and teacher of all the faithful, who confirms his brethren in their faith (Luke 22:32), he proclaims by a definitive act some doctrine of faith or morals. Therefore his definitions, of themselves, and not from the consent of the Church, are justly held irreformable, for they are pronounced with the assistance of the Holy Spirit, an assistance promised to him in blessed Peter."
Conditions for papal infallibility
Statements by a pope that exercise papal infallibility are referred to as solemn papal definitions or ex cathedra teachings. These should not be confused with teachings that are infallible because of a solemn definition by an ecumenical council, or with teachings that are infallible in virtue of being taught by the ordinary and universal magisterium. For details on these other kinds of infallible teachings, see Infallibility of the Church.
According to the teaching of the First Vatican Council and Catholic tradition, the conditions required for ex cathedra teaching are as follows:
1. "the Roman Pontiff"
2. "speaks ex cathedra" ("that is, when in the discharge of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, and by virtue of his supreme apostolic authority….")
3. "he defines"
4. "that a doctrine concerning faith or morals"
5. "must be held by the whole Church" (Pastor Aeternus, chap. 4)
For a teaching by a pope or ecumenical council to be recognized as infallible, the teaching must make it clear that the Church is to consider it definitive and binding. There is not any specific phrasing required for this, but it is usually indicated by one or both of the following:
a verbal formula indicating that this teaching is definitive (such as "We declare, decree and define..."), or
an accompanying anathema stating that anyone who deliberately dissents is outside the Catholic Church.
Wickipedia
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by FortAnthem
And that doesn't sound ridiculous to you? Infallible when conditions are right?
Originally posted by EricD
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
Who knows.
Maybe it's just something like the Pope finally admitting he's not "infallible". Something it seems the rest of the world has known for ages, but Archbishops and Popes never seemed to realize.
Perhaps saying that "Yes, I the Pope can make mistakes. I am not really perfect" is earth-shaking and "intense" for them. Just not to us.
Seeing as how neither Popes nor Bishops, neither Cardinals nor priests, neither clergy nor lay person actually believes that, it wouldn't be very intense.
Try finding out what the Church actually teaches before slamming them for it. the Pope is not perfect. He is a sinner like the rest of us. That is what is taught by the Church.
But hey, don't let the facts get in the way of you getting your hate on.
Eric
Originally posted by Angus123
Maybe it's just something like the Pope finally admitting he's not "infallible". Something it seems the rest of the world has known for ages, but Archbishops and Popes never seemed to realize.
, the Pope makes a statement that is known as "speaking ex cathedra". Anything he proclaims "ex cathedra" is believed to be infallible by the Church. It is extremely rare for a Pope to do this.
Originally posted by DISRAELI
Originally posted by Angus123
Maybe it's just something like the Pope finally admitting he's not "infallible". Something it seems the rest of the world has known for ages, but Archbishops and Popes never seemed to realize.
, the Pope makes a statement that is known as "speaking ex cathedra". Anything he proclaims "ex cathedra" is believed to be infallible by the Church. It is extremely rare for a Pope to do this.
Even after our understanding of the concept of "infallibility" has been corrected, the original statement remains true, viz;
That the rest of the world does not believe it, and many think it would be a good idea if the Papacy ceased to claim it.