you’re an atheist, of course anything that would consider being supernatural you think there is always an explanation.
I guess to me being what i consider myself to be 'atheist' [technically agnostic with most evidence -> zero god(s)] means i simply don't buy into
all the plastic nonsense of organized religions.
I will also say that if there is a god(s) then i would even arbitrarily reject them/it, because their existence is inherently in opposition to my
exercising of my [self-decided if necessary] free will.
It is certain that we don't understand even a microfraction of greater reality. According to astrophysicists we only have a good idea of 5% of the
Universe [the part we are aware of, can 'see' in various EM spectra].
As a geometricist, there are an infinite number of dimensions that intersect with every point in our Universe & beyond. Our interactions are only with
some 3D + time subset of the inherent, theoretic potential experiences.
Real factual science doesn't actually require that understanding be cloddy & dumb.
Real science includes the fragile & delicate & arguably more interesting.
Back to the thread topic, post incensed [teasing mostly].
Water is very polar. The positive & negative charges on an H2O molecule. So the negative ends of one molecule are very strongly attracted to the
positive ends of the next. That is why water with lower mass atoms is much denser than O2, N2 & CH4, etc.
Polarity/differentiation is at the very heart of existence. Polarity, differentiation is at the very heart of identity. Neutrality is almost by
definition indistinguishable anonymous context.
Polarity is perhaps more extreme in that there is a plus & its opposite minus.
Identity [identifiability] is technically empiric & neutral, but in a sense it is in opposition to its context [from which it arises].
To exist is in opposition to non-existence. Imagination [& some other things] is perhaps in between, because we experience it yet we don't consider
it 'real', at least not in the material sense. It might even be a bleed over from the non-existent to the existent.
Non-existence must always always be far more full, rich & diverse than existence can even hope to begin to imagine.
In fact the passage of time requires that some not now existing pattern replace the current pattern of existence. We tend to think of existence as a
fixed binary state, but in fact it is part of a continuity of transitory/changing time.
Polarity is like active differentiation because it has an anti or opposite form, usually in equal quantity. The interesting thing is that both sides
of a given polarity are differentiated both from some neutral 'substance' as well as from the anonymous context all three forms are differentiated
from. The pro[positive] & anti forms cancel &/or balance each other out.
Literal electric charge has forces of magnetism extend beyond the physically charged 'particles'.
Personal tangent rant follows:
We talk about vacuum as 'sucking' things like a vacuum cleaner, but in fact a vacuum cleaner operates on the 14 pounds per square inch of air
pressure. If you remove that pressure one place & the other air rushes in to fill it. There is no 'sucking' involved, it is all pushing, air
Space vacuum is in fact neutral. The only way you get what most people call 'vacuum' [sucking] force would be with either electro-magnetism or
gravity or perhaps some other force.
We identify life as [bio-]organized animation systems. Chemistry [chemical structure] defrays standard physical animation in ways so subtle & complex
that we now argue about 'free will' & consciousness.
Anyway water, as per my understanding semi-locks into large quasi-molecules. There is probably a lot of wild magnetic storming, especially with warm,
hot water. That is why it is a good universal [mild?] solvent. Because it is both solvent, yet mild it makes a kind of in between domain for
manipulating organic [& other] chemistry. If you include freezing, wetting & drying you can create a lot of states that can be utilized to manipulate
Now i theorize that a lot of what happens to us can be charted by the particular flow/formation of oxygen molecules we encounter/react with.
That might be partly applicable to water, except that it is faster, more subtle & less seemingly deterministic. In that where the particular breaks in
the semi-molecules of configured water create activation/breaking/constructing points for chemicals/organic-molecules in the water.
One can leap & reach & stretch, & not without potential credibility that water is the source of all events of life, especially since it is where we
believe all life on this planet arose.
Arguably all Earth life is an echo of water's design, but since water has already moved on to its next formulations it is hard to call it lasting
intent in quite the way we think of human thought intent.
Odd related tangent:
I wonder if the micro vibrations of water expand in size as a wave into the water, until it intersects a chemical molecular reaction size. So to see
into the future of water's directions we must look at the micro small & how an area of these expand & intersect to create identifiable, significant &
perhaps useful events.
The future probably belongs to the immeasurably small.