It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jenna
reply to post by vaevictis
Sexist comments such as that are the mark of someone who needs a reality check, not a female who dares to discuss military issues. It doesn't take testes to understand them, nor are "neutral topics" more suitable for discussion by females just because they have ovaries.
Originally posted by UberL33t
reply to post by Vitchilo
Well this is a rather disturbing development. Posturing indeed like belial259 said. I feel this move is seemingly solidifying what some have said is an inevitable event. This is the last thing that the World needs right now. The phrase "To hell in a hand-basket on greased rails" comes to mind. I'm going to pray for a peaceful resolve to this.
[edit on 5/5/2010 by UberL33t]
Originally posted by vaevictis
Originally posted by aboveandbeyond
Originally posted by Jenna
reply to post by Demos
They also know the US is stretched thin in both manpower and funding. Our troops can't be everywhere and we can't afford another war. I hope nothing comes of this, but it honestly wouldn't surprise me if something does.
Maybe manpower will work as a deterrent without doing anything?
aboveandbeyond, I don't mean to appear rude or callous, but i don't think military matters are for you to discuss. you just haven't earned it. you'd be the first to cower in the corner uttering some skirt-clutching squeals of horror like 'what are THEY going to do about it? THEY - never YOU. i know what i said doesn't sound politically correct but it's time someone said it. women really need to conduct a reality check. i'm sure you've a lot to offer on ats maybe it'd be better to choose a more neutral topic where you can actually contribute rather than pulling one-liners out of your girlish a**
Originally posted by thoughtsfull
Originally posted by vaevictis
Originally posted by aboveandbeyond
Originally posted by Jenna
reply to post by Demos
They also know the US is stretched thin in both manpower and funding. Our troops can't be everywhere and we can't afford another war. I hope nothing comes of this, but it honestly wouldn't surprise me if something does.
Maybe manpower will work as a deterrent without doing anything?
aboveandbeyond, I don't mean to appear rude or callous, but i don't think military matters are for you to discuss. you just haven't earned it. you'd be the first to cower in the corner uttering some skirt-clutching squeals of horror like 'what are THEY going to do about it? THEY - never YOU. i know what i said doesn't sound politically correct but it's time someone said it. women really need to conduct a reality check. i'm sure you've a lot to offer on ats maybe it'd be better to choose a more neutral topic where you can actually contribute rather than pulling one-liners out of your girlish a**
Personally should anything kick off I'd want my partner covering my back, am sure she'll give anyone a really hard time...
Going back down the timeline a bit, before the Puritan and Victorian moral systems pushed women down, women hereabout where as adept at defending their homes and families as the men...
Originally posted by Jenna
reply to post by vaevictis
Inferring that women are mentally incapable of understanding military issues is not "pointing out alternatives". It is sexism plain and simple, regardless of what you call it. You might as well have said that us poor feeble women-folk ought to get ourselves back in the kitchen where we belong.
Originally posted by tauempire
You can MENTALLY understand war issues..along with politics but you girls are becoming rare and rarer now adays.
But i guess you would also cry sexism if i said women should not be going into combat(well at least the AVERAGE woman).
Originally posted by thoughtsfull
There are girls here abouts that enjoy getting into fights and are happy to take on the bigger males especially when they are tanked up...
Originally posted by vaevictis
Originally posted by aboveandbeyond
Originally posted by Jenna
reply to post by Demos
They also know the US is stretched thin in both manpower and funding. Our troops can't be everywhere and we can't afford another war. I hope nothing comes of this, but it honestly wouldn't surprise me if something does.
Maybe manpower will work as a deterrent without doing anything?
aboveandbeyond, I don't mean to appear rude or callous, but i don't think military matters are for you to discuss. you just haven't earned it. you'd be the first to cower in the corner uttering some skirt-clutching squeals of horror like 'what are THEY going to do about it? THEY - never YOU. i know what i said doesn't sound politically correct but it's time someone said it. women really need to conduct a reality check. i'm sure you've a lot to offer on ats maybe it'd be better to choose a more neutral topic where you can actually contribute rather than pulling one-liners out of your girlish a**
Originally posted by tauempire
Originally posted by thoughtsfull
Originally posted by vaevictis
Originally posted by aboveandbeyond
Originally posted by Jenna
reply to post by Demos
They also know the US is stretched thin in both manpower and funding. Our troops can't be everywhere and we can't afford another war. I hope nothing comes of this, but it honestly wouldn't surprise me if something does.
Maybe manpower will work as a deterrent without doing anything?
aboveandbeyond, I don't mean to appear rude or callous, but i don't think military matters are for you to discuss. you just haven't earned it. you'd be the first to cower in the corner uttering some skirt-clutching squeals of horror like 'what are THEY going to do about it? THEY - never YOU. i know what i said doesn't sound politically correct but it's time someone said it. women really need to conduct a reality check. i'm sure you've a lot to offer on ats maybe it'd be better to choose a more neutral topic where you can actually contribute rather than pulling one-liners out of your girlish a**
Personally should anything kick off I'd want my partner covering my back, am sure she'll give anyone a really hard time...
Going back down the timeline a bit, before the Puritan and Victorian moral systems pushed women down, women hereabout where as adept at defending their homes and families as the men...
Thats a lie..and you know it. i know your trying to stick up for women but...how were they as 'adept' as men? could they fight just as well(remember men are stronger,faster,and have better lung capacity).They might have been able to hold there own but they were NEVER as 'adept' as men when it cames to what your talking about.
There have been numerous studys proving that gender roles are apart of the animals kingdom...there has even been studies shown where they study human children.children were asked(five yr olds)who should wear a dress.
All boys and girls said:women.
They were all asked if men should stay at home and take care of the kids as mommy went to work...they all said the mom should stay at home and men should be the one to work.
If this and other studies are true then gender roles are as real in humanity as in the animal kingdom:sorry feminists.
[edit on 6-5-2010 by tauempire]
Originally posted by aboveandbeyond
Originally posted by tauempire
Originally posted by thoughtsfull
Originally posted by vaevictis
Originally posted by aboveandbeyond
Originally posted by Jenna
reply to post by Demos
They also know the US is stretched thin in both manpower and funding. Our troops can't be everywhere and we can't afford another war. I hope nothing comes of this, but it honestly wouldn't surprise me if something does.
Maybe manpower will work as a deterrent without doing anything?
aboveandbeyond, I don't mean to appear rude or callous, but i don't think military matters are for you to discuss. you just haven't earned it. you'd be the first to cower in the corner uttering some skirt-clutching squeals of horror like 'what are THEY going to do about it? THEY - never YOU. i know what i said doesn't sound politically correct but it's time someone said it. women really need to conduct a reality check. i'm sure you've a lot to offer on ats maybe it'd be better to choose a more neutral topic where you can actually contribute rather than pulling one-liners out of your girlish a**
Personally should anything kick off I'd want my partner covering my back, am sure she'll give anyone a really hard time...
Going back down the timeline a bit, before the Puritan and Victorian moral systems pushed women down, women hereabout where as adept at defending their homes and families as the men...
Thats a lie..and you know it. i know your trying to stick up for women but...how were they as 'adept' as men? could they fight just as well(remember men are stronger,faster,and have better lung capacity).They might have been able to hold there own but they were NEVER as 'adept' as men when it cames to what your talking about.
There have been numerous studys proving that gender roles are apart of the animals kingdom...there has even been studies shown where they study human children.children were asked(five yr olds)who should wear a dress.
All boys and girls said:women.
They were all asked if men should stay at home and take care of the kids as mommy went to work...they all said the mom should stay at home and men should be the one to work.
If this and other studies are true then gender roles are as real in humanity as in the animal kingdom:sorry feminists.
[edit on 6-5-2010 by tauempire]
And who do you think 'convinced' girls to wear dresses, long hair and all the rest of it in the first place? Five years is a long time and surely it didn't just happen on a whim, right? I must say I'm surprised, I expected that sexist opinion regarding women's knowledge about war to be gone but it's still there...how is telling me to shove something up my ''girlish a**'' anywhere near nice?
Originally posted by Jenna
Possibly. Sending more of our own troops to the North Korean/South Korean border in response to this could go one of two ways.