It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Forget Star Trek. A wormhole is more like hyperspace, than a spacewarp. Focus on ufo's and Extended Burkhard Heim physics.
And because anti-matter is so hard to produce - consider zero-point-field energy.
And the zero-point-field might also be useful as a FTL communication medium.
Arguably one of the key factors in the decision to begin construction of an interstellar spacecraft will be the economics. Any interstellar space vehicle is likely to be astronomically expensive to build, and in all likelihood will cost tens, hundreds and possibly thousands of times more than even the International Space Station (ISS). Of course, this potentially multi-trillion dollar burden on today’s suffocated economy is incredibly unlikely. However, we can perform a simple exercise to calculate approximately when such a project becomes fiscally feasible. Before we do consider the economics let us first contemplate some of the motives that might drive us to partake in such a project. Arguably one of the most convincing arguments, although least urgent, is the long-term stability of the sun. Clearly on billion year timescales, continued life on earth cannot be guaranteed. While Earth’s fate is not entirely sealed, the belief that the death of the sun is an event looming in the distant future is widely accepted. Although a civilization of some deep future may engineer ingenious methods to perpetuate life on Earth as long as possible, the Earth and ultimately the solar system itself will become increasingly inhospitable, and more appealing climes will manifest themselves compelling us to visit and maybe colonize other star systems. ...