It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Alleged NASA -Affiliated Astronomer Deciphers 'Intelligence' Signal From Nearby Stars

page: 89
175
<< 86  87  88    90  91  92 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 05:03 AM
link   
reply to post by AnneH
 


Please rest assured AnneH that every person on this thread would publicly acknowledge they were wrong and alternatively kiss your various sock puppets if we were found to be wrong.
However unless you come to the table with a glass of red and a REALLY big explanation, and some evidence soon - all is as it stands at the moment.
Yer?




posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 05:05 AM
link   
Mmmm... interesting text, no breaks, use of 'oldie-worldy'
words like 'yer' -telling fibs and 'cast any stones'...
nah, I ain't falling for it, Jude.

To insult people from the beginning of your postings is a
little poor in my estimations, to accuse others and fake a
rant (no breaks, but exclamation marks) is even lower.

Maybe you could assist us AnneH, in unraveling this confused
tale?
I see 'Tescos' lists higher on your perception than the area of
Gatehead...? why is that?, is Tescos a regular haunt and the idea
that Gateshead is known by everyone in the world is a given, because
it's all of your world?
Odd that you say this and then immediately write:
'... I never found him to be as bad as you are trying to make the
world believe...

Hmmm.

This seems to be set as a 'across the neighbour's wall' arguement,
but there's things here that throw me, when the writer really starts
to rock!
'... Roy has copied all of this nonsense written here and printed
it all as evidence.
I am reporting this web page and all of this content to the police and
cybercrime unit in Newcastle upon Tyne in the morning for a full
investigation, and I will start criminal proceedings against the owners
of this website and all concerned in this slander and defamation.
yes I do have a direct contact to Debbie and Kim.
Want me to give you their telephone numbers on this page?...


'...May God have mercy on yer all for doing such wrong!

Quite a threat, Cybercrime Unit (no capitals, heh?)
Slander and defamation... and yet, you feel it's fine to threaten to
place private information on this site, and yet you don't worry about
that those beyond the grave may find find that cruel.
Hmmm, horses for courses, as we say up North.

... This is me last time here cause i feel nausious just reading
all the rubbish yer all writing here.
Yer all like a pack of dogs with rabies! Shame on yer all!


I can understand your frustration... it's not very nice when folk
who are supposed to be your 'mark' become your jury.

You stay safe AnnH and you're welcome back anytime.





[edit on 2-7-2010 by A boy in a dress]



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 05:10 AM
link   
reply to post by AnneH
 


AnneH , may i ask how your time zone is one hour ahead of mine when you claim to be in england like me?.

sorry but you are BUSTED AGAIN. england has one time zone, germany just so happens to be one hour ahead of england just like you are of me on this websites times and world clock,

wow what a strange coincidence, you are one hour ahead of me and so is germany, just so happens that judy faltskog lives in germany !.

or do you own a tardis that you use before posting?.

and dont even say that you never said you was in england because you have to be if you have got a british police force to deal with your alleged reported crime!.

BUSTED BUSTED BUSTED BUSTED BUSTED BUSTED BUSTED BUSTED BUSTED BUSTED BUSTED BUSTED

thanks

rich



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 05:24 AM
link   
I must apologise, my dear AnneH... I missed this little
gem.
... I still have trust in the British judicial sytem.
Let me make it very clear to yer lad, me husband is
also a police officer and me name is not judy...


May I ask -and I hope I'm not being too bold,
If you're so concerned with peoples welfare and character,
why didn't you inform your/yer husband about the heroine
problems?

There are facilities in the UK and especially certain areas where
unemployment is rife... to deal with these terrible social issues
(I'm not going too fast for you, am I?) ... and a career-minded
gent as you're/yer husband must be, would have known this and
assisted them out of their dilemma.

But still, the UV/radio signals... can your friends help us with this
confusing issue?



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 05:59 AM
link   
I've looked at the words that AnneH... (oh, don't think
none of us DIDN'T see your little 'An Hoax' joke...
which is wrong, anyway -my lickle Judes) ... used and found
that some more just doesn't add up.

You set off and bully the supposed bullys by mentioning
names and threatening to release private imformation
about them. Yet, you're so aggrieved, you never bothered
to ask your husband if this would be morally right?

You indicate that the people you mention, are ravenous to
sleep with others all around that area and yet your Policeman-
husband ignores this and prints off the evidence...
(which you seem to think is an important act, why not just save
the pages?)

Through RICH's diligent work, you ignore his findings and rage on
about who he may or may not of spoken to... you don't confront
the initial problem -which is RICH, you assume that what is written
is true and therefore that tells me that it is and you were aware of it.

You're sweating, Judy/James and you don't like it.
Now please explain to us how this all came about... the Judy/James
Wayne show.

Explain the UV signals issue against the radio telescope problem
and then we can all put this behind us and be friends... and meet at
Tescos.

No aspersions wre cast on RICH-ENGLAND in the making of this text!

[edit on 2-7-2010 by A boy in a dress]



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 06:21 AM
link   
Oh, just one final note, AnnH... if you think the
images of this 'fibbing' Judy character and the
face-on image of the misrepresented James
are different....

why in the judy images, does she attempt to hide
her ears? With jewellery and the such, I would have
thought a lady's ears would be displayed more.

Just a thought and thanks again Judy for your thoughts.

[edit on 2-7-2010 by A boy in a dress]



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 06:25 AM
link   
reply to post by A boy in a dress
 


Another wee problem... Why, oh WHY, would the inspector involved try to locate the ever on the lam JUDY (she IS still on the run, hiding from those nefarious intelligence operatives, ISN'T she? It's so hard to keep up with all the twists in this scam) to see if SHE "wanted to press charges", and yet there was no mention of JAMES, the alleged pseudo-friend and stalwart spouse of AnneH's HEART friend Janice?

Why isn't AnneH raging for the inspectors to get in touch with her friend JAMES, who she claims to be here in defense of? Reckon the might be some reason they can't find JAMES, adam's apple and all?

Poor, poor James... AnneH lost sight of his plight in her efforts to suddenly shift course and defend Judy!



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 06:29 AM
link   
reply to post by nenothtu
 


i am unsure why the alleged detective would need to be "trying" to contact judy when i have already provided a link with judy's phone number on it !!!!! just a simple phone call should suffice!

thanks

rich

[edit on 2-7-2010 by RICH-ENGLAND]



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 06:37 AM
link   
reply to post by nenothtu
 


Another wee problem... Not that quite North, but I know
where you're/yer coming from.

... Why, oh WHY, would the inspector involved try to locate the
ever-on-the-lam JUDY (she IS still on the run, hiding from those
nefarious intelligence operatives...


Maybe the local 'Bobbies' of the area aren't quite up on the latest
information coming out of Interpol, the CIA and MI5... but I'm quite
sure now, with AnneH's informtion, they'll be tracking down friends
and relations as we speak (maybe even checking the 'Big Market'
toinght!

... Poor, poor James... AnneH lost sight of his plight in her efforts
to suddenly shift course and defend Judy!


If Judy is being held by unknown captors and all the evidence here
was faked many years ago by unknown agencies to imply James is
now Judy... I agree with you, Neno... wouldn't that be the big issue
here?
To fix the confusion that dark forces are making and not to worry about
a few website geeks that think we know everything.
That's why I say, AnneH... can you help us...? You're our only hope...
OBE 1.

EDIT: Why did she join this site today, AnneH seems okay around
computers and becoming a member and such...
but why say '... Roy has copied all of this nonsense written here
and printed it all as evidence...

That's a little odd to me. The Police CAN't access this site? The
British 'Peelers' don't have departments that monitor and save sites
such as this one?
Roy... (with all respect)... must be a beat-cop and doesn't know these
things.


[edit on 2-7-2010 by A boy in a dress]



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 06:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by RICH-ENGLAND
reply to post by nenothtu
 


i am unsure why the alleged detective would need to be "trying" to contact judy when i have already provided a link with judy's phone number on it !!!!! just a simple phone call should suffice!

thanks

rich

[edit on 2-7-2010 by RICH-ENGLAND]


Might it be that pesky time zone difference? Wouldn't want to disturb her too early... err, maybe I mean late... err, SOMETHING!

Who can keep up with all these twisted time zones, anyhow? Could get a body ALL twisted up!



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 06:53 AM
link   
If I was accused by certain websites/friends/strangers and
family of being unscrupulous, the last pointless thing I would
do would be to try and scare folk off the subject... (hmm, a little
light as just gone on, there)

I would debate the subject and show evidence to indicate
that confusion had taken place and with goodwill and common
sense, the truth prevailed.

The evidence would clear one of the initial slur and your conduct
in solving and 'ironing' the problems, would show your integrity.

None of this above as been shown yet.

Evidence to show the characters in this thread have been shown to
be some what vague and elusive, AnneH's postings show no sign of
her wishing to assist James or, in AnneH's eyes, the other girl, Judy.
Who may be a Doctor... being held captive... about UV signals being
discovered with radio telescopes... Aw heck, I'm grinning again!

[edit on 2-7-2010 by A boy in a dress]



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 07:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by A boy in a dress
reply to post by nenothtu
 


Another wee problem... Not that quite North, but I know
where you're/yer coming from.


'Tis No' a drriss, hit's a KILT!
I dinna ken hae lang it'll take to git it hitched oop proper wi' me sporran flooppin' aroond like that!



Maybe the local 'Bobbies' of the area aren't quite up on the latest
information coming out of Interpol, the CIA and MI5... but I'm quite
sure now, with AnneH's informtion, they'll be tracking down friends
and relations as we speak (maybe even checking the 'Big Market'
toinght!


Good thing she's not in America - we have all that problematic interoperability between computer databases to deal with... wait, I just peeked out the window, and there's a black SUV parked across the street. I'll be back in a minute, I have to go tell the nice secret agents that they traced the wrong IP, she's not HERE fer cryin' out loud!

German GSG9 ain't got nothin' on the CIA for efficiency, German engineering notwithstanding!



If Judy is being held by unknown captors and all the evidence here
was faked many years ago by unknown agencies to imply James is
now Judy... I agree with you, Neno... wouldn't that be the big issue
here?


Oh no, not UNKNOWN captors! right off of the first page of this thread, in "Dr." Judy's own words:

" I was told that it has reached diplomatic levels. Guess who is the main negotiator? Pretty soon we have to go on stealth mode as FB is infested by blokes with "Need-to-Know" and "X" security clearances. That is if we want to get the Truth out to the Public, ..."


It's those blasted diplomats, and blokes with "need to know" and "X" security clearances who have nothing better to do than lurk around Facebook!

And to think it's our tax dollars funding those nefarious Alphabet Soups... err, I mean "Groups". Wait, maybe it's not MY tax dollars - can anyone tell me WHICH country employs security clearances like that? Those aren't US Security Clearances - except maybe "need to know". My teenage son tells me I don't have that clearance pretty often...



EDIT: Why did she join this site today, AnneH seems okay around
computers and becoming a member and such...
but why say '... Roy has copied all of this nonsense written here
and printed it all as evidence...

That's a little odd to me. The Police CAN't access this site? The
British 'Peelers' don't have departments that monitor and save sites
such as this one?
Roy... (with all respect)... must be a beat-cop and doesn't know these
things.


I detect a "work from home" opportunity there! I can save these things and e-mail them to the proper authorities in Britain. I have the proper security clearance to access ATS ( I reckon it's not quite as high up as "need to know"), and I guess they don't. They NEED me!


[edit on 2-7-2010 by A boy in a dress]

[edit on 2010/7/2 by nenothtu]



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 07:10 AM
link   
Aw hell!... they're taking the proverbial golden liquid, here!!
WarlockANDJudge... W AND J..?!!!
AnneH... A NEW Hoax...?!

So they (Wayne/Judy/James) came here to get along side
us to do what? Stifle us?... make us tire and leave it alone?
To show us the error of our ways, perhaps?

Whatever the reason was, they can forget it... it doesn't make
any difference if this gets you fame... you'll be classified as
fraudsters.
"...Only don't tell me that you're innocent. Because it insults my
intelligence and it makes me very angry.
Now, who approached you first? Judy or Wayne?"

"There's a car outside that will take you to the airport.
I'll call Tescos and tell them what flight you're on"

"Go on. Get out of my sight"



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 07:17 AM
link   
reply to post by nenothtu
 


Sorry Neno, about the 'too North' comment and as you know,
we can only have one man in a dress-per-page here anyway!!

The 'printed off' sentence indicates to me a visual action
where real material is produced and taken away from view.
This sort of threat is used on certain people who perceive life
in a purely visual manner.
If AnneH had said that the information was being saved (then
again... why should she give her plans away?!!)... then I could
understand that, but this smacks of a juvenile quality or even
desperation.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 07:26 AM
link   
reply to post by A boy in a dress
 


Sort of like putting new life into a dead horse, isn't it? All I really want to know at this point is just which one was providing the breath to the poor beastie during the CPR!



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 07:37 AM
link   
reply to post by A boy in a dress
 


On a more serious note, I've been involved in two investigations regarding nefarious computer dealings. In both cases, 'Evidence' was preserved electronically, and only produced in hard copy for the trial phase, when it was entered into evidence.

In one case, I provided hard copy for an investigator concerning certain 'hacking' techniques, since he needed to know, and the material in question was not available on the investigated machine.

Actual printouts are passe, except in certain extenuating circumstances, and they have to be certified before being entered into evidence as true and accurate representations of the material in question.

Nope, not buying it. With all the dark background ink from an ATS webpage, they wouldn't even make decent wallpaper.

Edit: because bleary eyesight makes me spell funny...

[edit on 2010/7/2 by nenothtu]



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 08:01 AM
link   
Netties Hermit sez WOW! I double that! What you miss when you are gone!

Dr. (?) AnneH!!!!!!!!

Cosmicpixie thought she stepped on a landmine after starting this thread, but Dr.(?) Judy/James/Jimmy?/ AnneH has made it a goldmine of ATS points!

Slander, he/she (JIMMYJUDYANNE) says?

Give up, already hoaxster in your latest incarnation.

Dang! The Inspector just slapped the cuffs on me!




posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 08:38 AM
link   
Make no mistake... and I for one, can be accused of
taking this thread with levity... Dr. Judy/James will fight
tooth-and-nail (even if painted!) to not everyone around
her/him perceive her/him as a hoaxer.

Wayne's place in all this is still vague and maybe RICH is
correct when he says' that they all may be the same person.
but no doubt, someone will idle by with a 'J' and a 'W' in their
Username and take us further down this strange trail.

The last thing a hoaxer will want is to be publicly held to
a mirror and see that shameful face peering back...
especially without make-up.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 09:46 AM
link   
Please come back AnnH.

Since you are familiar with everyone in this twisted plot and you are now using a computer again, then you must have been rescued by Austin Powers and returned to your UV telescope array.

Please, sit down with us and have a cup of coffee, let's chat.

I want to apologize for being rude and questioning your motives in this sordid affair with the alien signal and feel like we interrupted your story before it was finished.

So please, tell us the ending of your story that we so rudely interrupted.

Were you to eventually "break the code" and tell us of some kind of hidden record or the such?

Was this, the big news I read on another site about an author stating that something big was about to happen in SA?

Could it have been that an alien signal from these well known stars would be proof of life on its own merit ? All we would need is a star map and a book to look at the heavens and believe again.

Perhaps it is a message from the ancients and they want us to follow a prophet that will lead us to save the planet and redeem our souls.

I don't know.

Please come back AnnH and finish your story.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 10:43 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



new topics

top topics



 
175
<< 86  87  88    90  91  92 >>

log in

join