It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Religion, sexuality and personal beefs can all be found here.
Well, I'm not banned, nor have I ever even been warned for my posting conduct. Yet, I have never made any secret of my contempt for christianity, nor that I have an agenda to not only kick it while its down but, if possible, kick it to death.
Why I asked about ATS's religious standpoint is because I get a negative drift against anything that is non-Christian and it is allowed by the moderators yet I am sure based on your past track record, if I do the same, I would be banned.
Originally posted by Andromedia
... the thread were left to boy in a dress making witty remarks and then one or two regulars commenting...
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by A boy in a dress
Maybe it was a typo, BIAD.
Andromedia may have meant to hit the T instead of the W when writing witty?
Yeah, not surprising since the motto is "deny ignorance". Just as there are many ATSers who have researched the known facts about the origins of christianity, the ideas that made it into the canon, their purpose & the purpose of the faith, from its emergence as disparate cults to an official religion with a single doctrine, there are many of us who can look @Wayne Herschel's Oneism & similarly spot the misrepresentation of facts & the purpose behind it all.
f anything, ATS seems to be anti-Christian if not totally anti-religious at times.
So I thought I have to say this... and the only way to do it, is to become a member.... and ...
for saying the things I did and I can already see you do not like it eletheia,
I will probably be banned before midnight ! Although I hope not as it would be grossly unfair
as others are aloud to voice their exact opinions !!...
Well, if you have any interest in ATS apart from this thread, you'll notice that, in the Debate Forum, there is currently a subject along the lines of "MSM is controlled by a nefarious conspiracy". The "con" participant has acknowledged that there is a conglomeration of power within media, but challenged the "pro" participant to demonstrate that this is a conspiracy & that its nefarious. Regardless of our views on the issue, in terms of debate, this is a requirement, if the "pro" argument is to prevail.
I was quite surprised when I saw this thread is still going and that it is a handful of regulars chatting along, being witty, in most instances totally off topic and breaking most ATS rules but for some sinister reason they are never banned