It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Alleged NASA -Affiliated Astronomer Deciphers 'Intelligence' Signal From Nearby Stars

page: 165
175
<< 162  163  164    166  167  168 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 06:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by moaningmartel
reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND
 


Please plug it up!

You are really annoying the hell out of me!


Grow up or SHUT UP!


no, sorry, i have every right to discuss this as long as i stick to the T&C.

so in light of that i will return to my questions.

why did judy faltskog need a work permit for germany if she is a swedish citizen?.

why did judy faltskog tell wayne herschel that she has never been to south africa?.

why did judy faltskog claim to be gaining her astrophysics degree in america at the time of her arrest in south africa?.

why did judy faltskog try to contact janice falcus when she claims to have never met her, never heard of james van greunen and never been to england?.www.knowhere.co.uk...

thanks

rich




posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 06:17 AM
link   
reply to post by moaningmartel
 


Even if Ms Faltskog was previously a male
(WHICH CATEGORICALLY AND AS A MATTER OF FACT SHE WAS NOT
what would be the crime of having had the wish to become a woman????....


There's no crime and nobody here is accusing Ms. Faltskog of anything that
has to do with his/her sex change... We're just trying to get to the facts.
Please MM, calm yourself.


... There is no law against that, it is definitely NO crime!!!!
So what is the witch hunt for a transexual here?
And why is it that you use it as a way to criminalise anyone????
Are you all stark raving LUNATICS????
What is the punsh line here???
I fail to get to grips with what you are getting at?


You are correct, the change of sexuality is not a crime.

There is no witch hunt... (with my name, I should know!)

I have at times, been stark... and twice, raving.

There is no punchline, nobody is trying to catch you out, we'e just trying
to ascertain the facts of the UV signal hoac and Wayne Herschel's part in it.

I fail to get the grips on things to!



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 06:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by moaningmartel
Ah, and one more thing!

Even if Ms Faltskog was previously a male (WHICH CATEGORICALLY AND AS A MATTER OF FACT SHE WAS NOT) what would be the crime of having had the wish to become a woman????.... There is no law against that, it is definitely NO crime!!!!

So what is the witch hunt for a transexual here? And why is it that you use it as a way to criminalise anyone???? Are you all stark raving LUNATICS?????What is the punsh line here???? I fail to get to grips with what you are getting at????







I think you are missing the point here, no one on this site realy cares one iota about the sex change. But the whole point of this thread is to get to the TRUTH and to do so the lies need to be demolished.
The first being that she was never James then there was the Hoax signal and if you want to go further back the UFO hoax and i could go on and on ad. infinitum..........................



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 06:47 AM
link   
reply to post by moaningmartel
 


Seriously, this whole thread is just Bla Bla Bla Bla and lots of hot air!

I came to ATS to learn something of value and all I find after reading this
is a gossip column for old cranky men and scorned woman!

I am inclined to think that this is a deliberate attempt by debunkers paid
by some sinister government agency to discredit Wayne and Judy.

It is NOT normal for people who have never met either of the people
under discussion here, to follow with such total passion the ins and
outs of Wayne and Judy.
I think more its a case of jealousy and envy of the highest grade!


Your first posting alludes me MM, you say you came to learn, and yet
we AREN'T learning anything are we?
This tirade of insults isn't getting us anywhere and I think the Lawyer
Company that has been notified, will be shocked at the way we have
carried on this Hoax discussion.

I'll wager you'll see their disdain in the returning email.



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 07:20 AM
link   
This is very strange, I would've thought that a reply would have been forthcoming
from the Lawyer's office regarding James/Judy as a client.
I know that as a Detective of 30 years, Moaningmartel will have come across
many lawyers and I'm guessing that he/she may be able to 'pull a few strings'
to hurry the response on.

I do hope it's soon.



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 07:32 AM
link   
reply to post by moaningmartel
 


There's a thing that bothers me, and I hope you can clear
this up MM.
When you wrote:
2 down and 5 to go......
Its the hurt that really gets to you, right Richard?


I know you commented that you were going to post only five times,
but what did you mean to 'Richard'?... the second line.
I never quite understood that part.
edit on 2-11-2010 by A boy in a dress because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 07:33 AM
link   
reply to post by A boy in a dress
 


i agree, i thought they would be in a hurry to get this thing up and running after all that moaningmartel had to say.

maybe they are still reading through the thread?.

either that or they just think the whole thing is some kind of joke and aren't going to waste their time.

thanks

rich



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 07:40 AM
link   
reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND
 


I know most lawyer firms are very busy with clients and the courts and
I 'm guessing that this may have taken a backseat with all the 'ambulance
chasing' that goes on.

Still, it could be lunchtime, wherever they are.... possibly?



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 07:44 AM
link   
reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND
 


I Checked the Lawyer's website...
www.hg.org...

... and where it displays the other ares of Law that it deals with,
there's no mention of providing assistance in proving a NASA employee
discovered a UV signal from space with a radio telescope.

I'm looking for a possible Page 2... please wait.



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 07:59 AM
link   
Is lunchtime nearly over or do Lawyers have a couple of hours to dine?!!

To Moaningmartel.
Do you think there's a door at the back of The Sphinx's head?
This is bothering me and I'm still looking in to it.
(the subject... not the door)



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 08:05 AM
link   
reply to post by moaningmartel
 

Furthermore, I am not a cyber cop as you put it, I am a detective and my beat is narcotics, solicitation, human trafficking, smuggling etc.
Oh now that almost is worth a string of 30 lols! You? A detective? Oh, the dealers & pimps in your neck of the woods must be quaking in their boots!
See Marty, ordinary police are deliberately recruited from those of no more than average intelligence, b/c the responsibility they are to be given can, with even a little more forethought than they are capable of, be seriously abused with impugnity. Detectives however do have to be a bit brighter, b/c, apart from finding evidence after the fact, a great deal of their job isn't 'detecting' @all, its anticipating what criminals will do, so that @least 1 of them can be caught in the act by beat cops. The reason is that police forces just dont have the resources to have people waltzing around like Inspector Morse on the payroll.
With the intellectual skills you've demonstrated here, if you arrested me, my solicitor would have to request that the interview be stopped b/c they'd be laughing too much to pay attention as I answered your questions, in as much detail as you requested, & simultaneously, with a completely straight face, mocked everything you are & stand for, but in a way which was too subtle for you to realise you were being mocked, except by my solicitors reaction, & the confusion on your face would make my solicitor laugh all the more. I can say this with confidence b/c its actually happened irl, but the detective in question, despite deriving his sartorial choices from "Miami Vice" was quite bright. Its just that what I'd done wasn't actually illegal. However, before doing it, I did realise that it would get right up the collective nose of the police (that's partly why I did it - I owed them 1), so I anticipated their interference & made sure I was teflon.
You?



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 08:14 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 08:19 AM
link   
reply to post by Bunken Drum
 

(OFF TOPIC MODERATORS, FORGIVE ME AGAIN?!)
I applied for the Police Force... did I tell you that?
I saw the article in a local paper and turned up at a dindgy office where
I was given a uniform and an address.
I presumed a case was ongoing and with a 'script' -given by the smelly
cigar-chewing man from the office, my disburbingly tight uniform on my person,
I set out to crack the puzzle.

Well!! The next thing I was in a room with what-seemed a lot of 'tipsy' ladies
shouting for me to 'gerrem off!'
I realised about half-way through my routine... (that's what they call it apparently)...
and after reciting the words from the script, that this WASN'T the Law Enforcement
career I had in mind.

I dropped the employment a couple of months later, but I now have attained the skill
of swinging my shirt above my head without knocking the porcelain dog off my mantle
-piece... that one there *BIAD points*



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 08:22 AM
link   
reply to post by moaningmartel
 

Thank you MM... I presume this Hoax thread will be closed down while the
ATS owners get to the bottom of this.
I guess Roschier, Attorneys Ltd will be in touch with ATS.



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 08:23 AM
link   
reply to post by moaningmartel
 


you should u2u the owners with that message, maybe Springer or Crakeur.

anyway, its good to see you back, would you care to answer my questions now please?.

why did judy faltskog need a work permit for germany when she is a swedish citizen?.

why did judy faltskog tell wayne herschel that she has never been to south africa when she quite obviously has?.

why did judy faltskog claim to be in america gaining her astrophysics degree at the time she was arrested in south africa?.

why did judy faltskog claim to be married to a man named bjorn when she is actually married to a woman?.

why did judy faltskog try to contact janice falcus when she claims that she has never met or heard of janice and james and has never been to england?.
www.knowhere.co.uk...

your help in answering these questions would be highly appreciated.

thanks

rich



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 08:28 AM
link   
reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND
 


I gues this avatar will be more appropriate from l'il olde BIAD in
the future!



A curse on the lotta yer' I say!
edit on 2-11-2010 by A boy in a dress because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 08:33 AM
link   
reply to post by moaningmartel
 


Hi MM,

You are not having a very good day are you ?

Why do you not start answering the questions your "friends" on ATS are asking you ?
You do realise in a court of law you will have to answer questions! oopps! done it again sorry MM forgot you have 30 + years of Law Enforcement experience.

This will be some court case, can you imagine the following it will have, I mean lets face it, we are heading to page 200 on this thread and you have not even answered one question yet.

Bring it on, the sooner the better,
Will I get my expenses paid ?



Soutered = mislead lie misrepresent falsify beliefs delude hoodwink



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 08:37 AM
link   
I love this thread so much, It makes me lol. This thread was consider a hoax so long ago. I wish this was over that so long ago.



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 08:42 AM
link   
reply to post by A boy in a dress
 


Hello BIAD

(Sorry if this is off Topic moderaters Please forgive me just a quick one !! )

YOU HAVE NOT BEEN TO TESCO'S IN GATESHEAD TODAY AND BUMPED INTO ANNEH, HAVE YOU ?

Shame on yer !!








Soutered = mislead lie misrepresent falsify beliefs delude hoodwink



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 08:42 AM
link   
reply to post by Romantic_Rebel
 

Hah... the ongoing serial never ends and welcome to a thread that
will be around EVEN after 2012!



new topics

top topics



 
175
<< 162  163  164    166  167  168 >>

log in

join