It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Alleged NASA -Affiliated Astronomer Deciphers 'Intelligence' Signal From Nearby Stars

page: 160
175
<< 157  158  159    161  162  163 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 11:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by moaningmartel
reply to post by A boy in a dress
 


That IS JUDY FALTSKOG!!!!!

It is really frustrating and most of the time really upsetting to keep you lot company here! But I have had it..... NO MORE!!!

I have better things to do than reading all the BIAS stuff here!

So I wish you all a good life, I am checking out of ATS Permanently!!!!


Adios Amigos!


Please don't leave... this can be resolved in a decent manner... don't go.




posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 11:15 AM
link   
reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND
 


So do you think that the image in the FB page is Judy Faltskog?
Moaningmartel believes it is and he/she's a 30-year veteren of
Law Enforcement.



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 11:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by moaningmartel
reply to post by A boy in a dress
 


That IS JUDY FALTSKOG!!!!!

It is really frustrating and most of the time really upsetting to keep you lot company here! But I have had it..... NO MORE!!!

I have better things to do than reading all the BIAS stuff here!

So I wish you all a good life, I am checking out of ATS Permanently!!!!


Adios Amigos!


if as you state that the person in that photograph is the person that you know then why are you even here arguing?.

the judy faltskog that made the signal claim is categorically not the one in that photograph although that is her facebook page, we know this as absolute fact due to the many photographs taken from judys various websites and one supplied by judy herself and various witnesses that know her have identified her.

but again i thank you for your participation and for helping to strengthen the evidence against judy and for bumping the thread on google rankings, you have done us and the world a great service.

thanks

rich



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 11:19 AM
link   
reply to post by Nitromaria
 


I think you may have been a contributing factor in MM fleeing this forum,
What you said seemed to upset him/her and a hasty retreat was made.

Who do YOU think moaningmartel was?... Judy Faltskog?

Wow!! if that were true...



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 11:27 AM
link   
As Rich has stated that is the same Judy Facebook account that is linked in to all these stories of a radio telescope astronomer claiming an intelligent signal.

So if that is the same Judy you know MM then that is the same Judy we are talking about.

Glad we've cleared that up.

Now can you explain why they're so altered from the other photos we've seen of them (In both genders)?

-m0r



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 11:35 AM
link   
I think what the problem is, is this:



There seems to be a difference in the last image to the first two.
Can you assist MM?

Edit: There was also this classic from a previous posting of SunFlare or whoever!
(It got quite confusing!!)


edit on 1-11-2010 by A boy in a dress because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 12:22 PM
link   
Well, it looks like it's all gone quiet again, the waters have stilled
and the thread creaks of old age in the subdued peacefullness.




posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 12:28 PM
link   
reply to post by A boy in a dress
 


C'mon BIAD - that was a spot of fun back then.

I just hope MMs doesn't involve the cyber police and backtrace us all.

-m0r



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 12:31 PM
link   
reply to post by m0r1arty
 


*BIAD stifles a giggle and straightens his dress*
It was quite a ride... I too hope that moaningmartel sees that we're
trying to sort this out and not just fling dirt. I agree, I don't want
Cyber-cops waving their truncheons at me!



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 12:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by moaningmartel
reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND
 


Its useless dealing with stupid individuals! I hate really hate it!


irony is clearly lost on you....

thanks

rich



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 12:39 PM
link   
reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND
 


The more MM was pressed to explain anything about the information
you and Nitro mentioned, the more he/she became agitated.
That may not show something, but I must admit... I was surprised by
his/her reluctance to answer any of the accusations.



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 12:51 PM
link   
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 12:51 PM
link   
reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND
 


I thought for a moment we were going back to the LadySambuca/DoubtfulDina... (DD, MM?)
... and SolarFlare days or even worse... the 'A curse on the lotta yar' gang from
Tesco/Gateshead -UK.
It got really intense and I'm honestly try to help moaningmartel with this... he/she seems
upset by all this and I'm surprised.
I would have thought the thirty years of Law Enfrcement would've toughned him/her to
this sort of rigourous questioning.



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 12:55 PM
link   
reply to post by moaningmartel
 

Hi MM, what on earth are you shouting at?!
If you look to your left, you will see an indicator to show whether you're on the site
or not. Nobody was 'whispering' about you while were away. It's just the questions we
asked weren't answered and I surprised at your tirade... I would've thought a
stalwart of the Law -like yourself, would have a little more reserve.

Please calm down.

edit on 1-11-2010 by A boy in a dress because: Left lipstick in Edit Room.



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 01:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by A boy in a dress
reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND
 


The more MM was pressed to explain anything about the information
you and Nitro mentioned, the more he/she became agitated.
That may not show something, but I must admit... I was surprised by
his/her reluctance to answer any of the accusations.


i'm not really surprised at all, its exactly what i expected, its been pretty much the same modus operandi for all of the judy/james and wayne defenders, they come on and spout a lot of nonsense, they try to make a case but have nothing to make a case with and just end up digging a deeper hole for themselves and the people they are trying to defend by constantly contradicting themselves and the stories already given by judy/james, wayne and others.

they constantly try deflection tactics to avoid answering any relevant questions and just get angry if you keep pushing them for answers, which brings to mind the old saying "you can't argue against facts".

in fact i just don't understand why they keep returning to just make things worse for themselves, they would probably achieve far more by just letting the story die.

all they are achieveing here is keeping the story live and creating more links between the names judy faltskog , wayne herschel and the words hoax , scam , liars , con artists etc etc, so not only does the thread stay up the google rankings but those names become synonamous with those words so it gives more people the chance to find out exactly what they are.

thanks

rich



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 01:06 PM
link   
reply to post by moaningmartel
 


Hey MM,

The 'fun' I was having was that it looked like some conclusions were about to be drawn over the case of Judy by you.

This thread has been a long while in the making - I thought we were getting somewhere new and information which could cast off things which weren't relevant.

Seems I was wrong - but the fun was the potential of it.

Now would you are to mention why Judy has changed considerably in her photos. I mean blue eyes just tops the biscuit for me as to what cameleonic qualities she appears to have.

Looking forward to your answer and it's great to have you back!!

-m0r



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 01:08 PM
link   
reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND
 


A.T.S HAS TURNED INTO A BALLOONATIC (LUNATIC) ASYLUM......
That is the ONLY thing I agree upon



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 01:12 PM
link   
width="480" height="385"> "http://www.youtube.com/v/EKSVNcyr230?fs=1&hl=de_DE&color1=0xcc2550&color2=0xe87a9f" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385">
edit on 1-11-2010 by moaningmartel because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 01:18 PM
link   
reply to post by moaningmartel
 


Here I'll help you out and embed it properly MM.



Perhaps you could answer my questions or provide more than just a video for us to look at.

If you are interested in disinformation we have a whole section of the forums here dedicated to studying it and explaining how to avoid it.

-m0r



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 01:20 PM
link   
Thank you for your assistance! I dont spend my life on websites like this and certainly dont know my way around ATS



new topics

top topics



 
175
<< 157  158  159    161  162  163 >>

log in

join