It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by judyc
Wayne last posted 6 hours ago and now I can't post on his wall.
SOURCE
-Wayne Herschel- I am more concerned for her circumstances since her FB account is missing ... her other accounts are missing and her email is unanswered.
Judy has been an expert on some material that only an expert could portray. She is also very open about the importance of letting the truth out before it is stopped or censored.
Her friends are now very concerned and so am I....
See More
Consider this ... if all radio telescopes around the world are set up as claims are made from a source radio telescope wanting verification, they will all be tuning into a target star. And if a 'never heard before' sound or data pattern is incoming, imagine how difficult it would be to cover up in the astronomer scholar network.
This could be the case and Judy being Judy told friends who are interested in this crazy 'new' signal ... which I will be investigating with astronomers in the morning. Need to sleep now... its 2 am.
4 hours ago
Originally posted by Wookiep
Well, I sent a link to this board to wayne seems he's getting virus attacks.
Wayne Herschel- May 3 at 3:03pm Report
both Judy and my pages and internet are experiencing interference and virus attacks... this is typical. Please could you copy and paste all comments from my facebook for now and the updates there before the page disappears. they are targeting my 3 G5 stars any minute now... holding my breath!
Originally posted by bobs_uruncle
Good bit of a partial debunk there Bedlam, but, the UV range specified below is just outside of the visible band of 450nm to about 700nm.
Plants actually use 3 light frequencies, one UV (455nm), one visible red (665nm) and one IR (710nm) to push photons through the photon "pump" process and skin cancers seem to be caused by exposure to 280nm UV.
You are right though in that a radio telescope will not pick up UV, you need a special optical scope. But, UV would be the most viable transfer means that is close to visible light, if say one were pumping resolvable optical data over vast distances.
And if this is really happening and someone out there has an 8" to 16" f5.6 or better optical scope, they should be able to hook up a spectraly adjusted optical sensor array, that has say 212nm, 280nm and 400nm receivers and resolve the binary data, if the frequencies are real and data is actually there.
UV in the range of 2800 to 4500 angstroms reaches earth through the atmosphere all the time, without too much trouble. Yes there is some attenuation, but nothing like visible light and infrared.
All @ 212.55 nanometers
Originally posted by mcrom901
you guys should stop OSETI from wasting any further funds....
Originally posted by Atlantican
The Ultraviolet vs Radio debate is based on if she meant UV and not IR.
In the heat of a hurried situation a simple detail might be overlooked.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
1. While it is true that most UV from space would have been absorbed by the atmosphere, currently we do know that our atmosphere had been taking regular beatings from the sun's solar winds.
Could some of these UV managed to penetrate through and picked up by earth based RADIO TELESCOPES during such times?
(While this is not related to the topic, i would like to point out that even teeth had been known to act as radio receivers, but most certainly cannot be of the capability of radio telescopes to receive UV for sure! the point of this paragraph is to prove how much of unknowns that we have even yet to know of. )
I am not endorsing the OP claims, but only to open up minds so that more explorations and search be done, rather to say it is not true, case closed.
Originally posted by True-seer
reply to post by the.lights
Hahahahahahaha i find this amusing that this signal whatever it is appears 2 days before disclosure is supposed to happen.
Coincidence maybe who the hell knows.