It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Alleged NASA -Affiliated Astronomer Deciphers 'Intelligence' Signal From Nearby Stars

page: 157
175
<< 154  155  156    158  159  160 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 31 2010 @ 03:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by merkury

Hello Rich,

Nice to see you back on line, about time, your input was missed (probably not by a couple of folk , but hey, )

Look forward to your posts.


why thank you merkury.

i'll contribute wherever i can but i'm struggling at the moment as nonethtu and BIAD are doing such a stirling job at taking our new friend moaningmartel to task.

thanks

rich




posted on Oct, 31 2010 @ 04:38 AM
link   
reply to post by nenothtu
 

Once, in the middle of the night, running around on mountain trails, I heard an echo from inside the Earth that sounded for all the world like clanking machinery. There was only one specific spot where you could hear it. One step forward or backward and it would disappear
Ah, now this is within my area of expertise. What you're describing is the effect of "comb-filtering" produced by "standing-waves". Most likely the original sound energy was also propagated through some kind of tube (an underground waterway would work) & amplified in the same way that a bull-horn amplifies the voice, by directing the sound in 1 particular direction, rather than allowing it to dissipate exponentially, in the same way non-coherent light does.
Another effect that may have contributed is that when sound energy impacts an object, it will resonate within the parameters of its shape, size & whatever dampening is caused by its immediate surroundings, thus adding harmonics to the original sound which have no direct, or "musical" connection to the source. These harmonics will also propagate through a tube & also cause other objects to vibrate in similar fashion, creating more unrelated noise. Its quite possible then for the sound of dripping water to end up making a noise like an old diesel engine, if you're stood in the right spot to hear it. Also, "clanking" tends to describe what we sound nerds would call 'a width-modulated square wave with additional even numbered harmonics that was rhythmically amplitude modulated by an envelope with sharp attack, quick decay, low sustain &, without further info, indeterminate release' - exactly the type of thing I'd expect from the process I've described above.
Anyone can decode this nerdery by considering a church organ & then hitting a big concrete sewer pipe with a good sized hammer.
(TBC)



posted on Oct, 31 2010 @ 05:13 AM
link   
(Cont)
If anyone researches "Vox Dei", you'll discover that the organ pipe of that name is not particularly wide (you dont see them: they're just square section tubes of wood so cant be polished up pretty like the pipes you do see), compared to a concrete sewer, but it produces a note so low that we cant hear it: we just feel the sub-bass &, just like sub generators at a dance party, it adds to the "religious" experience. Now, if you stand at the opening of a big concrete sewer, which couldn't possibly resonate on its own at a frequency you could hear, & bang its edge with your lump/sledge-hammer, you'll hear a strange kind of "boing" sound. This is the combination of the effects I described above.
If The Sphinx were hollow, it would resonate just due to the effect of wind & blown dust on its outsides, nevermind the mechanical energy transmitted into it from earth movements, traffic & underground water movements, in the same way that suspension bridges do. Its inconceivable that there is nowhere within the vicinity that, however low the frequency of that vibration may be, it wouldn't cause sympathetic vibration in other structures &, considering how large The Sphinx is, the amount of sound energy produced couldn't possibly go unnoticed.
So where are the sound files, Wayne?



posted on Oct, 31 2010 @ 06:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by nenothtu
reply to post by Bunken Drum
 


Indeed, the attempted association with Dan Brown strikes as odd. Brown was writing fiction, which several people tried to turn into fact...

Ah. I've answered my own question, haven't I?
Indeed you have. I wont deny having enjoyed reading some of Dan's fiction: the bloke definitely has a talent for it. Still, a massive part of that talent is a facility with the English language. There's plenty of examples of entertaining fiction co-written by 2 authors: Terry Pratchet & Neil Gaiman spring to mind. I think Wayne & Judy would probably do better if they took some courses on creative writing & went balls-out into sci-fi. You never know, it could end up, L. Ron Hubbard stylee, getting them the adulation they crave, but in the meantime, it'd pay the bills without having to spend so much effort rallying the Light Brigade.
ETA: I'm sorry Judy, I used the above expression out of habit. "Balls off" would have been cruel, but, lets have it right, as I said above: you've made mistakes...
edit on 31/10/10 by Bunken Drum because: I left some pubes stuck to the tape machine.



posted on Oct, 31 2010 @ 06:39 AM
link   
reply to post by moaningmartel
 


i'm really glad you have decided to join us, as you have helped to stimulate discussion and bump the thread on google, the result being that more people looking up judy/james helena de cadanet van greunen faltskog and wayne herschel will come across this thead and find out the truth about said con artists.

again thank you for your contribution, it helps us and the innocent people greatly in our quest to expose the fraudsters.

thanks

rich



posted on Oct, 31 2010 @ 07:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by moaningmartelI think I am right when I say that you lot actually just fancies transexual and gay men. (why would you otherwise be so passionate about sex changes and trying to prove so desperately that other people are???)

Guess the saying is True " You got to be one to know one" Aint that so!?


So I am posting you lot something to lick your lips by on!


Dont have too many fantasies now, you hear?


www.youtube.com...
I am bisexual & regularly engage in the kind of activities most people will only ever see in porn. I wouldn't criticise anyone for a funky lifestyle choice, or I'd be a hypocrite. I could hardly be jealous, since I'm actually doing it, so much so that I'm starting to think I may need to calm down a bit more than I already have b/c it is taking a physical toll on me & I'm getting older. However, from experience of wounds elsewhere on my body, knowing that scar tissue is pretty numb, I'd have to say that deliberately getting your genitals messed with surgically is a serious mistake.
I also remember that I've made some bad mistakes in my life &, usually, for a while thereafter couldn't admit to myself what a pillock I'd been. Instead, in the normal human manner, I sought outside stimuli & gratification to distract me from the nagging knowledge that I was going wrong. Thankfully, I am also a good mate, so I have good mates that will tell me "Oi! Sort yourself out, or there'll be consequences."
I never did attempt to perpetrate a mass HOAX, but I did misrepresent myself as more successful than I was & lie about my failures, but in the end it always comes down to the bottom line, "show me the evidence or # off."
edit on 31/10/10 by Bunken Drum because: I removed some lols b/c the tags didn't work with my character count.



posted on Oct, 31 2010 @ 07:40 AM
link   
reply to post by nenothtu
 

h yes... I can see how that would distract some from Oneism... but would it not drive others into the arms of Onanism? Some could get the two confused... and Wayne seems to be trying to build his empire on confusion!

That sort of distraction could aid Wayne in the quest for confusion, rather than hinder him...
You could well be right. I'm placing my faith in the idea that people who see BIAD will want the Real McCoy & strive to experience such, rather than settle for the Herschel'd up wanking they're habitually bombarded with & told to want. I may be wrong too, but the tide of history seems to suggest that the more BIAD we see, the less Oneism we're prepared to accept.



posted on Oct, 31 2010 @ 08:43 AM
link   
reply to post by A boy in a dress
 

Edit: The desperation you mention... you're showing your hand!!
Oh Marty's showing his hand alright... & what's firmly grasped in it.
If I haven't made this clear so far, I have no problem with Onanism, so long as people realise its a stop-gap & dont try to tell the rest of us what to do with whatever we are endowed with. If they want to settle for self pleasure, its none of my business, but, sadly, the salient feature of religion is to encourage people to lie to themselves & poke their noses into others' business. The adherents then break their own rules in private until/unless they rise to sufficient status that they can break them in public with impugnity. So Oneism can 'one right off' as far as I'm concerned.



posted on Oct, 31 2010 @ 09:31 AM
link   
reply to post by nenothtu
 

I really hate taking the Freudian road of "so how was your childhood?" because that line of reasoning is usually bunk, and serves only to make excuses, but I think in this case there may really be such a causality link.
Cant say I'm a big fan of Freud either, but... for a variety of reasons, in the last 12-ish years, my own psychoanalytical skills have needed to be honed, so I've become able to get a whole variety of people to be as honest with me as they can be with themselves. As a result, I'm starting to think that the problem with Freud is that English wasn't his 1st language, so a lot of his ideas, in translation, are like taking a sledgehammer to a carpet tack: lacking the subtlety they probably had contained within his mind.
I wonder if this may have been the case with Wayne & Judy. In that, whatever it all began as, they just didn't know what their words mean to most English speakers &, once the ball was rolling, got caught up in their own hype?



posted on Oct, 31 2010 @ 11:06 AM
link   
reply to post by moaningmartel
 

How does your wives or boyfriends feel about you lot doing this? I bet they dont even know what you are up to.... Right???? (of course Im right!)
Actually, both my current & ex g/fs get quite turned on by watching me have another sub pleasure me whilst I surf the net, especially if I allow them to use the sub simultaneously. Sometimes I dont. We often talk about whatever I've discovered online. I'll explain:

Its a habit I picked up whilst married, mainly due to getting a bit bored of "the bdsm scene", but then I noticed that, although my wife knew what was happening & wasn't affected, other people thought it was very dom. These days, its a pretty effortless way to dom a whole bunch of subs & I only have to favour 1 of them with a little extra permission, so I can sit back, relax & have them provide most of the physical effort, simply b/c I've anticipated what will be required of me & what they want. I'm a bit lazy.
I mention this, Marty, b/c flinging out innuendos that you would find insulting do not insult all of us. We are not the same as you. Here @ATS, the motto is "Deny Ignorance", it just doesn't matter what our sexuality consists of, or what else we do irl, all that matters is what can we bring to the intellectual table. So please tell us what you are doing here if you simply wish to post strings of emoticons & ignore the question that BIAD & others have put to you many times: how is it possible for anything based on simply impossible evidence such as UV being picked up by a radio telescope to be true?



posted on Oct, 31 2010 @ 03:35 PM
link   
I know in many countries, this night is for watching for loved ones
that wish to be with us from the 'other-side'
Oh, a tale they could tell!

The children run from house-to-house and giggle in the dark at
their sweet gotten-gains. Goulish masks peer in through windows
and strange noises can be heard on the wind, but whatever your
beliefs, this is all done in jest.

The 'Trick' that Judy and Wayne have dabbled in is certainly no treat.
Let's hope by the end of this Hallow Eve, the Rotten Tooth Fairy isn't
the only one satisfied.


Boo.
edit on 31-10-2010 by A boy in a dress because: Left pumpkin in Edit Room.



posted on Oct, 31 2010 @ 05:55 PM
link   
reply to post by eletheia
 

Now out of all this came something interesting the star HIRAM ABIF rang a bell in my memory and i revisited the Amazon site that Waynes book was being touted on and if you remember an earlier post of mine when i related the reviews on his book i mentioned a review which was such a glowing review and said the book was worth its weight in gold.........................well the name of the reviewer who had only ever reviewed the one book was.............................................wait for it HIRAM ABIF would you believe it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Good sleuthing there too!
I'd really like to know why anyone would attempt to translate such nebulous concepts & connections as are the basis of spiritual beliefs into words, when to do so is nigh on impossible, but also inviting others to abandon their own spiritual path in favour of somebody else's. Are they so insecure that they cannot tread their own path without a hord of followers behind them? I'll tell ya, I've got some spiritual notions that are pretty unusual, as far as I've so far discovered, but I'll not tell ya what they are. To do so would, imo, be about the only thing I'd confidently call a sin. What I will do is describe the journey & some of the sights along the way, where relevant to a situation at hand, & trust that if anyone is going in the same general direction that I am, they'll either resonate with what I'm on about, or it'll just be more verbiage that goes in 1 ear & out the other, doing no harm on the way.
Get that, Wayne? You can practice Onanism in public all you like: it doesn't float my boat &, besides, the ineffable & I are too busy attempting to eff each other to waste time watching you try to get yourself off.



posted on Oct, 31 2010 @ 07:13 PM
link   
reply to post by A boy in a dress
 

The 'Trick' that Judy and Wayne have dabbled in is certainly no treat.
Let's hope by the end of this Hallow Eve, the Rotten Tooth Fairy isn't
the only one satisfied.
Ah BIAD, you could trick me & I'd still give you a treat!
For reasons that I'll allude to, I cant be @home tonight. Even if I could, chances are that none of the 'little darlings' would accept sweets from me, b/c I'm a bit genuinely scary looking & couldn't be bothered with a scary mask to hide behind. Instead, I've left some cheap Halloween related bits & bobs outside my house. Most of the kids around there are muslim, but there'll be a few that aren't, or were just playing along for laughs, that have been out & about. I expect that when the 1st kid discovers a £1 coin under a plastic bat, there'll be a mad dash to find what else I've left lurking.
There are also some less obvious Samhain related symbols lying about with more money under them & the most obscure, which is always hiding there in plain sight, has a £20 note under it. I'll be disappointed but not suprised if its still there when I return. If the kids want more sweets, they can buy them, but I live in hope that, those that already have sufficient interest to have discovered the greater rewards may treat themselves to a book & learn more.
Its a fallorn hope, but I've many of those. Between them & my responsibilities is whatever reason I'm still here. After all, the despair that arises just from the ability of people like Wayne & Judy to perpetrate this utter bollocks is almost enough to make me want to shuffle off.
(This, dear mods, whilst completely true, is also a metaphor for how I believe situations involving spiritual matters ought to be approached, ie without trying to force anything... WAYNE!)



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 03:19 AM
link   
reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND
 

i am actually not allowed a break, i must have a computer available at all times just in case any alien stories are uncovered so i can quickly discredit them, but fortunately the agency i work for provided me with a very impressive machine that just uses my agency standard black leather gloves as the control mechanism kinda like on the movie "minority report" and the screen is inside my agency standard dark glasses a bit like in modern fighter jets helmet mounted displays.
Aha! You've blown your cover! You're 1 of those agents that report directly to "M", aren't you? All we get is a mobile subscription & £0.01/disinfo character uploaded! Oh, & a funky uniform for those special assignments that are supposed to be our route to a better pay grade, but some how never quite are... I think I may need to look for a new job. As they say, old spies never die, they just come in from the cold.



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 03:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by observe50
Try low frequency wave lengths
For what? I have a number of different machines that can produce a whole variety of low frequencies, in any of EM spectrum, sound, or mechanical vibration.
What should I be looking for that relates to Oneism? I know how to use some of them for Onanism, but I prefer to use them for Two-or-more-ism.
ETA: the problem comes, just as with any other "ism" if its not anticipated so that it can be easily cleaned up & forgotten, the juh*cough*ism will leave stains that could also become a health hazard.
edit on 1/11/10 by Bunken Drum because: I left a soggy towel lying around.



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 05:47 AM
link   
reply to post by moaningmartel
 


I am a little disappointed in the lack of reponse from you -Moaningmartel, but I
know a Law Enforcement Officer's life is not an easy one and the tasks you may
have to endure can not be taken lightly.

So if you would be so kind as to refrain from the ranting and the faces, could you
favour me with answering a couple of more questions?

I can only guess at the expertise you have gained over 30 years of your profession,
in finding out the truth of any scenario, so with that in mind...
What do you think of those who keep asking for evidence regarding the UV signal
claim that Judy Faltskog made?

Did the South African verdict from Judy's case of kissing her partner -Ursula Verster
make you doubt your vocation?

Is there other information... that you may be aware of as someone who can 'root-out'
the truth, that has never come to light about Dr. Judy Faltskog's claim of a UV signal
and her employment at NASA?

The information gleaned from Wayne Herschel's sites implies he was involved in a book-
marketing scam... Do you think this is true and do you think Judy knew of this?

And finally...
Do you think that IF Judy has done the deeds claimed here about family break-up's,
deceiving loved ones over money and her relationship with Wayne Herschel,
do you think that she could still be a trusted conduit of information?

Thank you MM.
edit on 1-11-2010 by A boy in a dress because: Left Wicked-Witch-Of-The-West dress in Edit Room.



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 07:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by A boy in a dress
reply to post by moaningmartel
 


I am a little disappointed in the lack of reponse from you -Moaningmartel, but I
know a Law Enforcement Officer's life is not an easy one and the tasks you may
have to endure can not be taken lightly.

So if you would be so kind as to refrain from the ranting and the faces, could you
favour me with answering a couple of more questions?

I can only guess at the expertise you have gained over 30 years of your profession,
in finding out the truth of any scenario, so with that in mind...
What do you think of those who keep asking for evidence regarding the UV signal
claim that Judy Faltskog made?

Did the South African verdict from Judy's case of kissing her partner -Ursula Verster
make you doubt your vocation?

According to my research homosexuality was outlawed and a crime in South Africa untill the 90s, however that law has been removed. There exist sexual equality right accross the board for lesbian, gay, bi-sexual and transgender individuals.

Also President Mbeki did give a pardon to Ms Faltskog and she has no criminal record at all in South Africa.
This you can check with the Criminal Records center in Pretoria.

You can hardly call a person a criminal cause she kissed the woman she loved in public!!!!

Furthermore, if as you claim Ms Faltskog is a transexual person, she would not have been arrested for kissing a woman in public as the records would reflect then that the person is/was male and no criminal offence was commited.

So your speculations that she was a male fall flat on its face right there.

I requested information regarding this from the South African Government and due to their law on giving out personal information, I was able to find out that she was born in Sweden and immigrated with her family to South Africa at age 7 !! Her sex was registered as female even back then, so again your transgender theory flies out of the window!!

There also exists no connection between Ms Faltskog and the name "Van Greunen"

It could be that due to her interest in UFOs that she met James van Greunen who had interest in the same subject.

If you knock on doors long enough someone will open to give you information!

Check this information for yourselves

Is there other information... that you may be aware of as someone who can 'root-out'
the truth, that has never come to light about Dr. Judy Faltskog's claim of a UV signal
and her employment at NASA?

From my research I cannot find any evidence that Ms Faltskog stood up and made an official statement to the world that she found a signal!!!

She told Mr Herschel in Confidence what she maybe thought it was, but it was Mr Herschel that took centre stage and communicated this information to the rest of the world as fact. Trying to blame Ms Faltskog and portraying her as a hoaxer is ABSOLUTELY WRONG and TOTALLY UNJUSTIFIED!!

The information gleaned from Wayne Herschel's sites implies he was involved in a book-
marketing scam... Do you think this is true and do you think Judy knew of this?

And finally...
Do you think that IF Judy has done the deeds claimed here about family break-up's,
deceiving loved ones over money and her relationship with Wayne Herschel,
do you think that she could still be a trusted conduit of information?

I think all the talk of family break-ups are total hog wash and are people who felt let down cause their partners became involved romantically with Ms Faltskog. Sour Grapes mabe!!?? Revenge!!???

I believe that Ms Faltskog is being made the scape goat for someone else mistake. I will rather trust her than anyone else here on this thread.

You can get the picture when you see the accusations flying by a woman here on your thread who says her ex husband had an affair with Ms Faltskog.

Thank you MM.
edit on 1-11-2010 by A boy in a dress because: Left Wicked-Witch-Of-The-West dress in Edit Room.



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 07:34 AM
link   
Er, is anyone getting deja vu here? I feel like I read something just like this ages ago....


Well, if Im wrong, great find... Im definately gonna keep up with this



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 07:45 AM
link   
Due to your bias and one sided opinions here I know that my reply will just be trashed and taken as rubbish, so I really don´t know why I even take the time to reply to your questions!



posted on Nov, 1 2010 @ 07:48 AM
link   
reply to post by moaningmartel
 


could you please answer me a very important question, the judy faltskog that claims to be the astronomer etc claims she is not the same judy faltskog that was arrested in south africa and claims to have been in america at university at that time and claims to have never been a lesbian and always a swedish citizen......

are you now admitting that they are indeed one and the same person??????.

thanks

rich



new topics

top topics



 
175
<< 154  155  156    158  159  160 >>

log in

join