It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by K J Gunderson
Originally posted by novastrike81
Originally posted by -Blackout-
Originally posted by AndersonLee
Evidence is over rated .
Evidence of what? I have not seen any evidence that the Ark was found.
We'll never find it. Only gullible religious fanatics will believe in stuff like this.
And only people who don't want to believe the Ark is real will not believe even if it was found. You can't find what you don't want to see.
Funny since I do not want to believe in cancer but...
Well, you can see where I am going with that.
Originally posted by Shane
Well for a Topic titled Scholarly Squad Debunks Biblical 'Discoveries' it sure falls short of the mark.
I had expected some evidence to suggest some Biblical Discoveries of one type or another where false, but all that is offered is hearsay and dismissive remarks based on just perspective alone.
It is always nice to have opinion, and it is always nice to offer it as such, but nothing presented within the Post offers anything other than supposition and actually could be deemed as slander, debasing one's charater solely based upon speculation of someones intent.
It is also nice to see the sheep baaaaing in with their uniformed voices of conformity praising the efforts of narrow minded scholars who seem to be presenting themselves as Judge, Juror and Information Minister on all things.
It's just funny how Orwell had things figured out. Thought control enmasse.
Ciao
Shane
P.S. Hey Pablos
Did you ever hear of Heinrich Schliemann? Went out and found exactly what he was looking for. Didn't he? The location inwhich the City of Troy would be located. I suspect he may even have found Troy itself, although their is valid debate with evidence to support it that he only found it's location. Nonetheless, he did find exactly what he was looking for.
Based on the work of a British archaeologist, Frank Calvert, who had been excavating the site in Turkey for over 20 years, Schliemann decided that Hissarlik was, in fact, the site of Troy.
Originally posted by novastrike81
Originally posted by -Blackout-
Originally posted by AndersonLee
Evidence is over rated .
Evidence of what? I have not seen any evidence that the Ark was found.
We'll never find it. Only gullible religious fanatics will believe in stuff like this.
And only people who don't want to believe the Ark is real will not believe even if it was found. You can't find what you don't want to see.
Originally posted by pablos
reply to post by -Blackout-
I cannot agree more. I am over the "science" of people finding exactly what they are looking for right away. It just doesn't seem to work that way with any other field of archaeology. Take a paleontologist. They don't just go and look for a tyrannosaur and find one. Often they look for a tyrannosaur and find a rare plant fossil, or a bird or even nothing. It would be much more believable if this were the case. If they went looking for ancient stone ruins and stumbled onto Noah's Ark it might have some credence. It is all such a shame really, with what that kind of research money could help discover in that field. Even in biblical archaeology. The art itself does have merit at least to help discover better what life was like at the time, but has sadly become duplicit in the bigger con.
Great write up cheers._javascript:icon('')
Have you ever thought that maybe we where not meant to find those things?
Originally posted by Shane
It is also nice to see the sheep baaaaing in with their uniformed voices of conformity praising the efforts of narrow minded scholars who seem to be presenting themselves as Judge, Juror and Information Minister on all things.
It's just funny how Orwell had things figured out. Thought control enmasse.