2 Sydney UFO Video sightings ...

Just an update:
The original resolution photos have been kindly sent to me by the owner.
I'll get them up as soon as I finish the email back to them, as I have some other questions to ask regarding the day the photo was taken by the original photographer.
I will include the answers unedited also (if they agree, and when they answer them).
Keep you posted.

Cheers
Smigs

Originally posted by Smiggle
Just an update:
The original resolution photos have been kindly sent to me by the owner.
I'll get them up as soon as I finish the email back to them, as I have some other questions to ask regarding the day the photo was taken by the original photographer.
I will include the answers unedited also (if they agree, and when they answer them).
Keep you posted.
Cheers
Smigs

Smiggle.....

That will be very interesting

You will need to keep the photos as "original" as possible, including EXIF data.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

More birds and terribly faked CGI. Sigh.

Next...

reply to post by mithrawept


Thanks for the response mithrawept - thats 3 birds so far

OK - back to the photo video.
I asked the video poster some questions - he is not the photographer who took the photo, he is the person who noticed the object.
Here are the questions and replies:

Q: Where were you standing at the time the photo was taken – if you know the street name or a place name (even near the spot) that would help.
A: - street unknown- pic was taken from a parking lot by the ocean

Q: The exact date the photo was taken.
A: Thursday Feb 25 2010 3:40pm- the clock was set for Eastern standard time - not Australian time

Q: Was the object visible (did you see it) when you took the photo?
A: No, they didnt see it till i pointed it out

Q: Was the photo specifically taken to capture the unidentified object in the sky.
A: No

Q: Do you know what the object is?
A: No

Q: Did the picture prior to the one we are discussing or any following pictures contain this unidentified object?
A: No

Q: Would you say the lens was clean and uncorrupted at the time the photo was taken?
A: Yes

Q: Who first discovered the unidentified object in the photo?
A: I was the first to notice not the photographer.



[edit on 3/5/10 by Smiggle]

reply to post by Smiggle


Smiggle.....

The best way for you to handle the pic's is for you to post the pic's on "Yousendit" or "Rapdshare" or similar & then post a download link in the thread.

That will:

- Minimise image & EXIF data loss

- Allow other members to scrutinise the image

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

The photo just prior, and the camera property information (I typed it out, I didnt know how to copy and paste it). I also had to copy and downsize this photo to get it up on the board (just so ya know )

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/037d2b006508.jpg[/atsimg]

TAKEN PRIOR: Scenic large Harbour
DATE TAKEN: 16/02/2010 3:34 AM
PROGRAM NAME: Microsoft Windows Live Ph
DIMMENSION: 3586 x 2652
WIDTH: 3586 pixels
HEIGHT: 2652 pixels
HORIZONTAL RESOLUTION: 72 dpi
VERTICAL RESOLUTION: 72 dpi
BIT DEPTH: 24
RESOLUTION UNIT: 2
COLOUR REPRESENTATION:
COMPRESSED BITS/PIXELS: 4
CAMERA MAKER: FUJI FILM
CAMERA MODEL: FinePix S1500
F-STOP: f/3.6
EXPOSURE TIME: 1/300 sec
ISO SPEED: ISO-64
EXPOSURE BIAS: 0 step
FOCAL LENGTH: 45mm
MAX APPERTURE: 2.97
MEETING MODE: Pattern
FLASH MODE: No Flash, compulsory
BRIGHTNESS: 5
LIGHT SOURCE: Unknown
EXPOSURE PROGRAM: Normal
SHARPNESS: Normal
WHITE BALANCE: Auto
EXIF VERSION: 0220

Originally posted by mithrawept
More birds and terribly faked CGI. Sigh.
Next...

Mithrawept.....

On the one hand.....

I agree with your conclusions, as per my original post:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

On the other hand…..

I think it’s always interesting to work through the details so as to unequivocally identify the object & to instill good habits into our approach to these things.

Kind regards
Maybe…maybe not

The picture under discussion:
(This is not a screenshot from the video - this is a emailed picture) I have also had to lower the res to get it on the board at ats.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/76aabca098bd.jpg[/atsimg]

PICTURE UNDER DISCUSSION: sent to me 952KB
DATE TAKEN: 16/02/2010 3:36AM
PROGRAM NAME: Microsoft Windows Live Ph
DIMMENSION: 3586 x 2652
WIDTH: 3586 pixels
HEIGHT: 2652 pixels
HORIZONTAL RESOLUTION: 72 dpi
VERTICAL RESOLUTION: 72 dpi
BIT DEPTH: 24
RESOLUTION UNIT: 2
COMPRESSED BITS/PIXELS: 4
CAMERA MAKER: FUJI FILM
CAMERA MODEL: FinePix S1500
F-STOP: f/5
EXPOSURE TIME: 1/400 sec
ISO SPEED: ISO-64
EXPOSURE BIAS: 0 step
FOCAL LENGTH: 62 mm
MAX APPERTURE: 2.97
MEETING MODE: Pattern
FLASH MODE: No Flash, compulsory
BRIGHTNESS: 5
LIGHT SOURCE: Unknown
EXPOSURE PROGRAM: Normal
SHARPNESS: Normal
WHITE BALANCE: Auto
EXIF VERSION: 0220

The picture following:

The picture taken afte,r is of 2 poeple, and I dont have permission to put that photo up (I can ask them). It is a picture shown on the video of a woman and child - it is of the car park with the child playing - there is no visuals of the harbour, just the car park trees - I asked for the photo to check if the lense was clean and to get the camera data from the photo - (the lense was clean) this is taken 2 minutes after the photo with the object in it - (above)


PICTURE AFTER:
Woman and child: (sent to me as a 5MB photo)
DATE TAKEN: 16/02/2010 3:36AM
PROGRAM NAME: Digital Camera FinePix S15
DIMMENSION: 3648 x 2736
WIDTH: 3648 pixels
HEIGHT: 2736 pixels
HORIZONTAL RESOLUTION: 72dpi
VERTICAL RESOLUTION: 72dpi
BIT DEPTH: 24
RESOLUTION UNIT: 2
COLOUR REPRESENTATION: sRGB
COMPRESSED BITS/PIXELS: 4
CAMERA MAKER: FujiFilm
CAMERA MODEL: FinePix S 1500
F-STOP: f/3.2
EXPOSURE TIME: 0 step
ISO SPEED: ISO-64
EXPOSURE BIAS: 0 Step
FOCAL LENGTH: 13 mm
MAX APPERTURE: 2.97
MEETING MODE: Pattern
FLASH MODE: No flash, compulsory
BRIGHTNESS: 5
LIGHT SOURCE: Unknown
EXPOSURE PROGRAM: Normal
SHARPNESS: Normal
WHITE BALANCE: Auto
EXIF VERSION: 0220

I am curious about the before photo and the photo in question.
The timing between them is within the same time space - maybe 30 seconds apart.
The height of the prior photo seems to be taken from up high, and the photo in question taken down low.
Any thoughts?

Im off to google to just check where that lighthouse in the prior picture is.
Im not placing it in the area (by memory) of where the photo was taken from - just checking.

Cheers
Smigs

reply to post by Smiggle


posted at youtube:

Tesla said he (sic his) ship was suspended from above yet there is
electrostatic flow going through the ship. Some say earth to ionosphere.
Some say negative charge flow (ether carriers) push away positive red
ions and send out the green negative at the bottom.
The Green Aurora is at the North Pole as a comparison.