It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CHRLZ
Originally posted by FoosMDont you know how to use google books?
Not really, if I want a book, I buy it. There's something about paper.
y which issue was your best proof? I'm guessin' it's probably not radiation, now...
Radiation is either generally classified as low LET or high LET depending on the amount of damage caused by the amount of energy transferred to material exposed to such radiation.
For example, medical x-ray scans are considered low LET radiation because little damage is done to the living cells it comes in contact with in its travels.
However, radiation in space is considered high LET because it has the potential of causing a large amount of damage when it comes into contact with cells and tissues of the human body. High-LET radiation is made up of high-energy protons, charged particles, and gamma radiation.
Solar flares from the Sun, for example, are a source of high-LET radiation. Astronauts must protect themselves while in space when solar flares are increasingly active on the Sun. In addition, electronic devices orbiting in space and on the surface of Earth are often adversely affected by such high-LET radiation.
Originally posted by FoosM
Now the question one can have is, did Soviets after 1963 solve the problem of Radiation and Weightlessness? Well I haven't found any evidence for them overcoming the problem of radiation, has CHRLZ? Thats all he had to do. But he didnt. Because he knows the problem is there, and always has been there to this day. And thats why NASA is making a big deal about RADIATION in space now using words like space is "awash" in radiation. Well is that a good thing? Why wasnt this a problem back in the '60's?
Originally posted by FoosM
So lets recap, by 1963, long after the discovery of the VA BELTS.
Originally posted by FoosM
CHRLZ thinks he is smarter than the Soviets, because he thinks weightlessness and radiation is not an issue for deep space travel.
Deep space exploration is the term used for the exploration of deep space and which is usually described as being quite distant away from Earth, within or away from the solar system.
However, radiation in space is considered high LET because it has the potential of causing a large amount of damage...
The guy in the CM who the whole mission is floating in space yet we dont hear any complaining of weightlessness sickness?
Space motion sickness was first reported by American crew members in the Apollo era. In the larger Apollo and Skylab spacecraft, crew members could move around freely and therefore experienced vestibular and other sensory problems in the microgravity environment.
Originally posted by FoosM
Radiation is either generally classified as low LET or high LET depending on the amount of damage caused by the amount of energy transferred to material exposed to such radiation.
For example, medical x-ray scans are considered low LET radiation because little damage is done to the living cells it comes in contact with in its travels.
However, radiation in space is considered high LET because it has the potential of causing a large amount of damage when it comes into contact with cells and tissues of the human body. High-LET radiation is made up of high-energy protons, charged particles, and gamma radiation.
Solar flares from the Sun, for example, are a source of high-LET radiation. Astronauts must protect themselves while in space when solar flares are increasingly active on the Sun. In addition, electronic devices orbiting in space and on the surface of Earth are often adversely affected by such high-LET radiation.
Life Expectancy for Test Pilots much Lower than for Normal Population
Originally posted by FoosM
and so forth and so forth... After reading CHRLZ's last post I will hereby announce I won the argument.
CHRLZ wants us to waste time with how dangerous solar flares are compared to sunshine... just a tactic of distraction...
Furthermore CHRLZ does not want to cite his source because he probably got it from NASA
The text didnt say INTENSE Solar Flares. And even if it did...
Well I haven't found any evidence for them overcoming the problem of radiation, has CHRLZ?
Outer space is the realm of the unimaginable. An encounter with intelligent alien life would be the most extraordinary moment in human history, which is precisely why it would be absolutely impossible to keep such an encounter secret if it were to occur. As space travel began to become a real possibility in the 20th century, aliens in “flying saucers“ became a focus of fears and anxiety, replacing earthbound spirits. We project onto imaginary aliens some of our deepest fears — that we could be victimized, enslaved or exterminated by a technologically superior civilization. Typically conceived as highly intelligent, imaginary aliens represent the ultimate unknowable, feared “other.” In addition to conspiracy theories about aliens, other conspiracy theories surround real space exploration. The first heavier-than-air craft flew in 1903; only 66 years later, men landed on the moon. This rapid technological progress can be difficult to comprehend, which may make it easier for some people to mistakenly believe the moon landing was a hoax.
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
So People like Tomblvd, AgentSmith,weedwhacker, DJW001 would even believe this government
site eh?
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Outer Space
Outer space is the realm of the unimaginable. An encounter with intelligent alien life would be the most extraordinary moment in human history, which is precisely why it would be absolutely impossible to keep such an encounter secret if it were to occur. As space travel began to become a real possibility in the 20th century, aliens in “flying saucers“ became a focus of fears and anxiety, replacing earthbound spirits. We project onto imaginary aliens some of our deepest fears — that we could be victimized, enslaved or exterminated by a technologically superior civilization. Typically conceived as highly intelligent, imaginary aliens represent the ultimate unknowable, feared “other.” In addition to conspiracy theories about aliens, other conspiracy theories surround real space exploration. The first heavier-than-air craft flew in 1903; only 66 years later, men landed on the moon. This rapid technological progress can be difficult to comprehend, which may make it easier for some people to mistakenly believe the moon landing was a hoax.
So again, if NASA really did land on the moon why is the gov trying to debunk the theories with no evidence? eh?
What are they hiding then?
Come, answer it.
Originally posted by FoosM
This thread is without a doubt has proved Apollo believers dont have a leg to stand on in showing any evidence that man went the moon.
They have nothing only circular arguments and nitpicking!
Not only did Apollo miss all those solar flares during their peak season, they also managed to get by all those micrometeorites!