Originally posted by Josephus23
NO ONE knows the numbers.
You can't have it both ways, dearie.
And it is a rather obvious point against you that WE showed YOU the numbers that actually do exist. You HAD NO IDEA.
NASA did have a very good idea, if not exact. As it turned out, their estimations were high.
It is incredible what the mind will create out of nothing.
Well, if you claim that we/NASA had nothing, then clearly you had LESS than nothing.
You have been given the largest anomaly found within this information
Whoa, missed that. Please quote and cite the 'largest anomaly' (and be careful, INCLUDE context)
but yet you dismiss it for information that does not have any applicable science to back it up.
So you still haven't found the post mission reports on what radiation was actually measured?
I will depart with a quote from Dave McGowan...
How apt. You ARE aware that McGowan is most likely a practical joker?May I quote some of the absolute GARBAGE posted by McGowan? Here ya go:
"NASA doesn’t actually have all of that Moonwalking footage anymore. Truth be told, they don’t have any of it."
"For at least two decades now, since the launch of the Hubble Space Telescope, we have been promised dazzling images of the lunar modules sitting on
the surface of the Moon."
"Who knew that the Europeans even had a space agency?"
Completely uninformed - that's just embarrassing.
"I would think that it should be fairly easy to send some guys to at least orbit the Moon … right? I mean, all they have to do is add a couple
seats to the spacecraft design that they already have and they should be ready to go."
"the only known source for ‘authenticated’ Moon rocks is NASA"
And that's just the start... Yes, it's good to know you support McGowan. I'll send you a sale document for a bridge I have, that I'm sure you
will want to buy.
a strange vessel that looked like it had been salvaged from the set of Lost in Space.
REAL engineers understand that the design for a craft that will never encounter an atmosphere and is designed to work in 1/6 gravity, will look very
different to one for earthly conditions. But you want fins, streamlining and pointy bits? Yeah, that will really work well.
What would you be thinking, by the way, if you suddenly found yourself on the surface of the Moon with what looked like a cheap movie prop as
your only way home?
Interestingly enough, the LM was hailed as one of the crowning achievements of the Apollo program, as it performed essentially flawlessly in every
mission. It was an absolute tribute to Grumman's engineering abilities.
the untested contraption
Untested, eh? - let me ask right now..
DO YOU AGREE WITH THAT CLAIM?
Just a little hint - apart from what was done on the ground here on earth, what came before Apollo 11?
Come on, walk the walk, Josephus (now that you are trying to change the subject away from radiation..) and be ready for what comes next... (Yes, it's
They didn’t even need any modifications!
If you look carefully at the LM's, you will see there were minor mod's, but the basic design - brilliant. Why change it substantially, when it
worked so well?
But on the Moon? We nailed that **** the very first time!
Mercury, Gemini, the Apollo missions prior to 11... Wow, you really have researched this at *least* as well as McGowan did...
[edit on 1-5-2010 by CHRLZ]