It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Young Aussie genius whipping NASA in Moon Hoax Debate!

page: 628
377
<< 625  626  627    629  630  631 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 09:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
 



An impression of the real thing.


How FoosM sees the entire space program:




No, just Apollo.

But, Im glad you brought that up.
Explain how in the black of space you have a whitish dome?
Or, I should ask, why is the sky of that pasted picture of the LM not painted white to match the background?




posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 09:55 AM
link   
Another ATS thread concerning the NASA hoax :

More Fodder for Lunar Landing Hoax: Earth Scale



posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 09:57 AM
link   
reply to post by Ove38
 



The Apollo story is only half true. It didn't lead to men on the moon, it only lead to men in earth orbit, like Skylab and the International Space Station.


Are you volunteering to help FoosM loom for astrophotographs of the period showing the tell-tale streak of the CSM stack lurking behind in orbit?



posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 09:59 AM
link   
reply to post by FoosM
 



Explain how in the black of space you have a whitish dome?


The "whitish dome" is caused by glare.


Or, I should ask, why is the sky of that pasted picture of the LM not painted white to match the background?


Because I was trying to make it look as cheesy as possible.



posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 10:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ove38

Originally posted by DJW001
...Why would they go to so much trouble if the spacecraft were just a dummy, and the real action was taking place at Pinewood Studios....


The whole thing was a show off that had to turn out successful, no matter what. So the real and not so successful Apollo story was beefed up with fake photos and videos. The Apollo story is only half true. It didn't lead to men on the moon, it only lead to men in earth orbit, like Skylab and the International Space Station.



Thats right, while they were faking sending men to the moon, what the US was really doing was playing catch-up to the Russians designing manned craft for long term LEO missions.



posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 10:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by FoosM
I recall a discussion here regarding NASA photo manipulation.
Well you can always count on the UFO/Alien moon cities crowd to find anomalies:
This thread popped up:



Yes the UFO/Alien researchers are doing a tremendous job examining the Apollo record. It was the Apollo astronauts themselves, that claimed they saw things on their trip to the moon, thinking they would get the researchers on their side. Boy, were they wrong !

They all agree, NASA is hiding the truth.
edit on 27-10-2011 by Ove38 because: edit text



posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 10:58 AM
link   
Wtf now they went to them moon and saw aliens? Just a page ago they didn't go at all and faked it with museum pieces. Make up your mind



posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 11:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by PsykoOps
Wtf now they went to them moon and saw aliens? Just a page ago they didn't go at all and faked it with museum pieces. Make up your mind

No i said "Apollo astronauts themselves, claimed they saw things on their trip to the moon"

They saw nothing they were nowhere near the moon ! And yes the Landing Module was a model.
edit on 27-10-2011 by Ove38 because: more text



posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 11:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
 



Explain how in the black of space you have a whitish dome?


The "whitish dome" is caused by glare.


You mean like this?
www.lpi.usra.edu...

or this?
www.lpi.usra.edu...



posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 11:58 AM
link   
reply to post by Ove38
 




You've really "jumped the shark" here, Big Boy!! Busted, can't keep track of your lies, and failed.


No i said "Apollo astronauts themselves, claimed they saw things on their trip to the moon"

They saw nothing they were nowhere near the moon ! And yes the Landing Module was a model



Just a few posts up, you were applauding that ridiculous (**) thread about Apollo images....APOLLO, mind you, taken on the Moon!! And, falling for the ridiculous idea of NASA *manipulating* those APOLLO Moon images in order to *hide evidence* of some "unknown civilizations". The funniest part is, you used that nonsense claim in the thread from Aliens and UFOs as so-called *proof* of NASA "lies".....

.....yet, in that thread, the OP has absolutely no doubt...no doubt!...that the images from APOLLO that he used are the actually photos taken during the APOLLO misison on the Moon!!!

(Otherwise, his claims of *hidden* "unknown civilizations" on the Moon would be pointless....)


(**) For the record, the idea is ridiculous, once you examine the premises postulated in that thread, and understand how modern photo manipulation software causes anomalies to appear, when an image is over-analyzed to death. Especially considering the fact that images disseminated and shared today are digitized, often in JPEG or other methods, and pixellated as a result....because that is how the digital world works.



posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 01:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by ProudBird
.....yet, in that thread, the OP has absolutely no doubt...no doubt!...that the images from APOLLO that he used are the actually photos taken during the APOLLO misison on the Moon!!!

So, what ? He is mistaken, he thinks they are hiding UFOs and stuff. When they in fact are hiding evidences of the moon landing hoax. His contribution is welcome.



posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 01:27 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 01:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by Logical one
post removed by staff


Beat it or eat it all you want.

But you should be applying yourself to finding van Allen's statements.
Either by watching Jarrah's videos or using Google, who is always looking for more friends.

edit on Thu Oct 27 2011 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 01:45 PM
link   
reply to post by FoosM
 



But you should be applying yourself to finding van Allen's statements.
Either by watching Jarrah's videos or using Google, who is always looking f


Just as you should be applying yourself to finding an historical example of a huge, well prepared expedition that set out but lied about reaching their goal; if you can't find one, that would make Apollo truly unique.



posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 01:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Ove38
 


You are hilarious.....really, truly:


When they in fact are hiding evidences of the moon landing hoax.


Did you even bother to read through that other thread?? It isn't that long, so go ahead. Or, just watch the YouTube video he made....IIRC it's only about 8 minutes long, give or take.

Sure, anyone with a little common sense can see his faulty reasoning, based on misinterpretations and misunderstandings of image processing and storage and reproduction methods.

Because.....he is "analyzing" many photos that were altered from the originals only many years after Apollo, and only for various artistic purposes. Cropped, copied, shared digitally...and some that were "stitched" into panoramas, from individual frames that happened to be taken from positions that allow them to be manipulated together to make them into one "wide shot" appearance. All done using the benefit of modern software procedures....AND, he analyzed the results of that, and called it "NASA deception"!! He is flat wrong, his entire premise is wrong, and he is either willfully ignorant of his mistakes (and is sincere) or is an intentional hoaxer (ironic, isn't it? A potential hoaxer calling another well-known organization a *hoax*?).

Show just ONE post by that OP where anything he (thinks) he has *discovered* using the imaging software is something to do with an alleged "hoax" of Apollo. He saw giant *pyramids* and huge *staircases*...etc. Not one mention of some sort of *fake Moon set*.


Face it....your game is over. You are exposed, and your brand of nonsense will only sell to the very young children, or to the mentally infirm.



posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 02:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by FoosM

But you should be applying yourself to finding van Allen's statements.
Either by watching Jarrah's videos


And there was I thinking you wanted a quality accurate quote from Van Allen

edit on 27-10-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 02:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
 



But you should be applying yourself to finding van Allen's statements.
Either by watching Jarrah's videos or using Google, who is always looking f


Just as you should be applying yourself to finding an historical example of a huge, well prepared expedition that set out but lied about reaching their goal; if you can't find one, that would make Apollo truly unique.


Im not going to bother reposting.
Plus, you conveniently left out Chris Columbus.
I can see through your agenda.



posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 02:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by backinblack
 



That's one huge frikkin building!!..


It remains the largest closed volume on Earth. It is so large that convection currents actually cause it to develop internal weather! As I said, it is a heck of a lot of work just to provide color to a hoax.


I thought the biggest building like that ( largest closed volume )was a Boeing building in Everett, Washington?



posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 03:05 PM
link   
reply to post by FoosM
 



Im not going to bother reposting.


You need to post a first time in order to repost.


Plus, you conveniently left out Chris Columbus


Christopher Columbus did not take his three ships out to sea, cruise around the Mediterranean for six months and them come back and claim he'd been to China. He genuinely, if mistakenly, believed he had reached Asia. It soon became clear that he had actually discovered a new continent.


I can see through your agenda.


I should hope so. I'm trying to get someone on this thread to back up their claims with research and/or reasoning.



posted on Oct, 27 2011 @ 03:06 PM
link   
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
 


Hey, we did share with quite a number of groups around the world, though not all, or at once. As for the rocks "being terrestrial" it would seem they may actually have been at one point. Not long after the early Earth was formed we (it seems) were hit by a Mars size planet, the resulting material was what formed the Earths moon. Apollo helped create that theory of where our moon came from.



new topics

top topics



 
377
<< 625  626  627    629  630  631 >>

log in

join