It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Young Aussie genius whipping NASA in Moon Hoax Debate!

page: 617
377
<< 614  615  616    618  619  620 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 23 2011 @ 06:11 PM
link   
reply to post by FoosM
 


PLEASE ADDRESS THIS, "Foosm"....

and stop lying:



i149.photobucket.com...




posted on Oct, 23 2011 @ 06:44 PM
link   
This is a memo concerning the Apollo 6 photography.

Only one name, a NASA representative, is blacked out. I wonder who that could be...

-to add- Committee on Imagery Requirements and Exploitation (COMIREX) - the successor to COMOR.



edit on 10/23/2011 by SayonaraJupiter because: to add



posted on Oct, 23 2011 @ 06:53 PM
link   
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
 


SCRAPING the bottom, as usual.....

Apollo 6 was UNMANNED....a test firing of the Saturn 5:


Apollo 6, launched on April 4, 1968, was the Apollo program's second and last A type mission—unmanned test flight of its Saturn V launch vehicle. It was intended to demonstrate full lunar injection capability of the Saturn V, and the capability of the Command Module's heat shield to withstand a lunar re-entry. Fuel line failures in several Saturn V second and third stage engines prevented it from achieving lunar injection, but it was able to get close to lunar return velocity by using the Apollo spacecraft's engine, as was done on Apollo 4, the first Saturn V test. Despite the engine failures, the flight nonetheless provided NASA with enough confidence in the Saturn V to use it for manned launches. And since Apollo 4 had demonstrated the heat shield at full lunar re-entry velocity, a potential third unmanned flight was cancelled.


en.wikipedia.org...


TRY again, but you will FAIL each time, with each attempt.


Because, the FACTS are......(again) the photos....just ONE that proves Apollo is REAL:




posted on Oct, 23 2011 @ 07:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by webstra

A Speech by George H. W. Bush, President of the United States of America, given outside the National Air and Space Museum to commemorate the 20th anniversary of Apollo 11's moon landing.




And later this evening after the crowd disperses and the Sun goes down, a nearly full Moon will rise out of the darkness and shine down on an America that is prosperous and at peace. And for those old enough to remember that historic night 20 years ago, step outside tonight with your children or your grandchildren, lift your eyes skyward, and tell them of the flag — the American flag — that still flies proudly in the ancient lunar soil. And for those who were not yet born or then too young to recall — you who are the children of the new century, raise your eyes to the heavens and join us in a great dream, an American dream, a dream without end. Project Apollo, the first men on the Moon — some called it quixotic, impossible — had never been done. But America dreamed it, and America did it. And it began on July 16th, 1969. The Sun rose a second time that morning as the awesome fireball of the Saturn V lifted these three pioneers beyond the clouds. A crowd of one million, including half of the United States Congress, held its breath as the Earth shook beneath their feet and our view of the heavens was changed forevermore.


Link

And America "did it" refers to dreaming i think.


Not in any sensical reading - "it" is going to the moon - America dreamed "going to the moon", America DID "going to the moon".

For the 2nd "it" to be referring to dreaming you'd have to have some indication that the subject of "it" was changed, and there is no such indication.

I guess educational standards really are falling!!



posted on Oct, 23 2011 @ 07:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by FoosM
 


PLEASE ADDRESS THIS, "Foosm"....

and stop lying:


You are a bit behind in the addressing issues department, so take care of
that before making requests to others.

And I dont appreciate you calling me a liar.



posted on Oct, 23 2011 @ 07:52 PM
link   
reply to post by ProudBird
 


The shadowing and black levels around the "Challenger descent stage" do not look the same, as they do, in the 3x enlargement. If you follow your eyes around the shadow of the "Challenger descent stage" you can see what I am talking about.



posted on Oct, 23 2011 @ 07:59 PM
link   
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
 


Were those pictures not artificially enhanced a great deal ??



posted on Oct, 23 2011 @ 09:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
 


Were those pictures not artificially enhanced a great deal ??


Did you see what happens when I did a 3x enlargement?



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 03:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
reply to post by ProudBird
 


The shadowing and black levels around the "Challenger descent stage" do not look the same, as they do, in the 3x enlargement. If you follow your eyes around the shadow of the "Challenger descent stage" you can see what I am talking about.


Whats their game? It makes no sense.
Could it be the enlargement was just another photo taken at a different time?
Their software creates artifacts?



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 03:52 AM
link   
reply to post by FoosM
 


Odd isn't it?

If a moon hoax believer put up that standard of pic as proof they would all be criticizing it because it is heavily enhanced..

Double standards are a wonderful thing..



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 04:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by FoosM
As a follow up to this post I made:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

LunaCognita has made a video explaining discrepancies that he or she has found.





Originally posted by ProudBird
ALREADY discussed, in this thread.
A few (hundreds?) of pages back.....terrible attempt at polluting this topic, with already debunked info.....
(Three thumbs down....I only have two thumbs so that is fairly epic.....)


Hello, I'm sorry 'proudbird' but it's not good enough to try and shutdown a discussion by saying it's already been discussed, and then not being able to reference the original post.

Don't you find it interesting that these photos directly contradict what the astronauts claimed about having bruised and bloodied hands and fingers?

If it has already been discussed, you need to reference the original post. I'll be waiting.



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 04:51 AM
link   
reply to post by ppk55
 


Not only discussed but debunked.



terrible attempt at polluting this topic, with already debunked info.


I'm always amazed when an opinion is considered debunking..



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 06:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by ppk55

Don't you find it interesting that these photos directly contradict what the astronauts claimed about having bruised and bloodied hands and fingers?


They not only contradict testimony, they contradict themselves.

And Im still waiting for somebody to explain how astronauts on earth in full gear, which one assumes
must STILL weigh 185 pounds, managed to do simulations with no problem, but on the moon had difficulty
doing acrobatic jumps in 1/6th G.



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 08:02 AM
link   
reply to post by FoosM
 



nd Im still waiting for somebody to explain how astronauts on earth in full gear, which one assumes
must STILL weigh 185 pounds, managed to do simulations with no problem, but on the moon had difficulty
doing acrobatic jumps in 1/6th G.


What's not to understand? How high do you suppose they were able to jump on Earth in the full rig? A meter? They had difficulty climbing the ladder... you posted a picture of Armstrong struggling yourself. What is your obsession with lunar sports?



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 08:07 AM
link   
reply to post by ppk55
 



Hello, I'm sorry 'proudbird' but it's not good enough to try and shutdown a discussion by saying it's already been discussed, and then not being able to reference the original post.

Don't you find it interesting that these photos directly contradict what the astronauts claimed about having bruised and bloodied hands and fingers?

If it has already been discussed, you need to reference the original post. I'll be waiting.


Pay attention, PPK. The link to the prior discussion has been posted. Here it is again:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

(As usual, there are so many distracting posts you need to read through several pages to follow the complete discussion.)

By the way, where's that EXIF data? Surely you didn't think I'd just forget about that?



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 08:11 AM
link   
reply to post by backinblack
 



Odd isn't it?

If a moon hoax believer put up that standard of pic as proof they would all be criticizing it because it is heavily enhanced..

Double standards are a wonderful thing..


The irony in your statement is delightful. It's funny how some people will put all of their trust in a single video, a single report on the mainstream media, and the opinion of people who are paid to convince Congress they need to buy more missiles.



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 08:15 AM
link   
reply to post by FoosM
 



Whats their game? It makes no sense.
Could it be the enlargement was just another photo taken at a different time?
Their software creates artifacts?


I'll give this one to you. If you actually research this photo, you will no longer need to ask rhetorical questions. You will also discover a legitimate reason to discount it.



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 08:42 AM
link   
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
 



Only one name, a NASA representative, is blacked out. I wonder who that could be...


Only one name on that particular document is blacked out. It is, of course, Dick Underwood... we already know from his own oral memoirs that he was the liaison. (I'll bet you were going to say Farouk al Baz, weren't you?) Why was his name blacked out? Who knows? Intelligence agencies love to keep random "secrets." I couldn't help but notice that, contrary to T&C, you did not provide a link to your source. Here, let's fix that:

www.private-files.com...

You will notice that these memos are all about screening NASA Earth orbit photography to prevent accidentally publishing imagery that can compromise national security; missile ranges, air bases, that sort of thing. We've been through all that before on this thread, possibly twice. Eventually, the film from the Maurer was made public. In fact, I'm sure you've seen it hundreds of times:



(This is actually Apollo 4. A lot of these stage separation videos have false or no attributions, so I decided to go with one whose provenance I was certain of to prevent any potential "gotchas!")



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 09:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by webstra

A Speech by George H. W. Bush, President of the United States of America, given outside the National Air and Space Museum to commemorate the 20th anniversary of Apollo 11's moon landing.




And later this evening after the crowd disperses and the Sun goes down, a nearly full Moon will rise out of the darkness and shine down on an America that is prosperous and at peace. And for those old enough to remember that historic night 20 years ago, step outside tonight with your children or your grandchildren, lift your eyes skyward, and tell them of the flag — the American flag — that still flies proudly in the ancient lunar soil. And for those who were not yet born or then too young to recall — you who are the children of the new century, raise your eyes to the heavens and join us in a great dream, an American dream, a dream without end. Project Apollo, the first men on the Moon — some called it quixotic, impossible — had never been done. But America dreamed it, and America did it. And it began on July 16th, 1969. The Sun rose a second time that morning as the awesome fireball of the Saturn V lifted these three pioneers beyond the clouds. A crowd of one million, including half of the United States Congress, held its breath as the Earth shook beneath their feet and our view of the heavens was changed forevermore.


Link


Project Apollo = Apollo Simulation Project




posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 09:49 AM
link   
reply to post by Ove38
 



Project Apollo = Apollo Simulation Project


Your post = unsupported opinion. Why are you posting random photographs without any explanation or source? Why did you repeat the entire quotation without commenting on it? Either you are intentionally trying to take up space without furthering the threads or, well, let's just say one of us isn't working on all thrusters.
edit on 24-10-2011 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
377
<< 614  615  616    618  619  620 >>

log in

join