It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Its actually that sole boot print above the crosshair left of the rock that screams impossible. The shadows actually go toward the astronot even though its higher up!
And what about those three rocks close to the astros head on the right side.
Also pointing right at him!
Originally posted by debunky
Originally posted by dragnet53
reply to post by CHRLZ
Everybody in your eyes it seems always busted if they are a moonhoax believer.
This thread needs to be locked. It is like trying to argue with a brink wall on each side. I know my view point won't change because I know our government has lied from the RMS Lusitania to Global Warming.
since ya didnt answer I'd like to ask again:
How did NASA manage to fake lunar landscapes that would match up 100% with data from JAXA, 40 years later?
Or did JAXA just pretend to send a probe, and actually made their models according to ancient NASA fotos?
Originally posted by debunky
Not talking about pics of the landing sites.
Left: JAXA data
Right: Apollo
Isnt it time for you to randomly declare victory again?
Edit to add: You got a vacation home up there? Cool! Can I come visit you one weekend?
[edit on 20-5-2010 by debunky]
Originally posted by debunky
Never mind the Shadows.
Ignore 1000s of earth fotos with a single light source with shadows showing the exact same behaviour.
Just explain how NASA managed to fake moon landscapes matching up perfectly with JAXA data, not to be collected for 40 years.
Ohhh ohhh... FoosM is here!
Please, pretty, pretty please do tell:
Was von Braun in on it?
And what was this dream he was trying to realize?
[edit on 20-5-2010 by debunky]
Heh, and here you spent post after post earlier in the thread telling us that they brought von Braun into NASA explicitly for the purpose of "militarizing space", only to find out later he only wanted to go to Mars.
But then again, consistency was never one of your strong points....
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by FoosM
What in the bloody blazes is wrong with you??
Its actually that sole boot print above the crosshair left of the rock that screams impossible. The shadows actually go toward the astronot even though its higher up!
Your continued insulting misspelling of 'Astronaut' is uncalled for.
The rest of your "assessment" of the photo is merely laughable....
And what about those three rocks close to the astros head on the right side.
Also pointing right at him!
Your point? You do have one, I gather? NO? Thought as much...:shk:
Originally posted by debunky
Never mind the Shadows.
Ignore 1000s of earth fotos with a single light source with shadows showing the exact same behaviour.
Just explain how NASA managed to fake moon landscapes matching up perfectly with JAXA data, not to be collected for 40 years.
Ohhh ohhh... FoosM is here!
Please, pretty, pretty please do tell:
Was von Braun in on it?
And what was this dream he was trying to realize?
[edit on 20-5-2010 by debunky]
Jaxa from what I read didn't fully believe NASA on the apollo 15 landing site.
But I guess you missed the JAXA earth rising clips? The earth's scaling is wrong in the apollo photo's of the earth.
Originally posted by dragnet53
Originally posted by debunky
Not talking about pics of the landing sites.
Left: JAXA data
Right: Apollo
Isnt it time for you to randomly declare victory again?
Edit to add: You got a vacation home up there? Cool! Can I come visit you one weekend?
[edit on 20-5-2010 by debunky]
Notice that the JAXA picture is a 3d picture of the scanned surface of the moon. Now if it was a scanned surface would it also scan the equipment since it is supposedly still on the surface?
[edit on 20-5-2010 by dragnet53]
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by truthquest
The problem is you, FoosM and a few others are trying to prove photographic EVIDENCE is wrong to keen and semi pro and possible pro photographers on here, I bought my first all manual SLR in DEC 1979, yes 31 years ago it had manual focus and manual exposure, the best way to learn.
I have been into photography for LONGER than JW has been alive , the guy is an A**HOLE when he talks about this subject .
A clue for your next challenge DONT have a flat terrain put a few objects at the top of slopes some at the bottom of slopes some in between and use one light source see how the shadows look then
Originally posted by dragnet53
Originally posted by debunky
Not talking about pics of the landing sites.
Left: JAXA data
Right: Apollo
Isnt it time for you to randomly declare victory again?
Edit to add: You got a vacation home up there? Cool! Can I come visit you one weekend?
[edit on 20-5-2010 by debunky]
Notice that the JAXA picture is a 3d picture of the scanned surface of the moon. Now if it was a scanned surface would it also scan the equipment since it is supposedly still on the surface?
[edit on 20-5-2010 by dragnet53]
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by dragnet53
Originally posted by debunky
Not talking about pics of the landing sites.
Left: JAXA data
Right: Apollo
Isnt it time for you to randomly declare victory again?
Edit to add: You got a vacation home up there? Cool! Can I come visit you one weekend?
[edit on 20-5-2010 by debunky]
Notice that the JAXA picture is a 3d picture of the scanned surface of the moon. Now if it was a scanned surface would it also scan the equipment since it is supposedly still on the surface?
[edit on 20-5-2010 by dragnet53]
What he doesn't want to acknowledge is the fact that NASA said they mapped the moon to choose landing sites. Who knows, maybe they also mapped the moon during apollo using unmanned craft and from there extrapolated data for their photo compositions.
Not to mention we have no idea what the DoD was up to.
What he doesn't want to acknowledge is the fact that NASA said they mapped the moon to choose landing sites.
Who knows, maybe they also mapped the moon during apollo using unmanned craft and from there extrapolated data for their photo compositions.
Originally posted by debunky
Originally posted by dragnet53
Originally posted by debunky
Not talking about pics of the landing sites.
Left: JAXA data
Right: Apollo
Isnt it time for you to randomly declare victory again?
Edit to add: You got a vacation home up there? Cool! Can I come visit you one weekend?
[edit on 20-5-2010 by debunky]
Notice that the JAXA picture is a 3d picture of the scanned surface of the moon. Now if it was a scanned surface would it also scan the equipment since it is supposedly still on the surface?
[edit on 20-5-2010 by dragnet53]
*sigh*
yes: Left: CGI, based on the JAXA data.
Right: NASA faking that data.
It is not the landing site. The Rover moved on since that picture was taken. Tiny details, like the rock next to the rover don't show up. Being a metal frame it would have quite a different return than the regolith anyway.
Now: how did they anticipate the data 40 years before it was collected?
@Foosm:
So von Braun was in on it? He knew it was impossible to go to the Moon, so he started planning for Mars? Because Mars would be so much better for weaponizing space than the Moon? I was under the impression that having some nuclear missiles on the moon would be an advantage since they can fire down here quite easily, while getting up there is a whole lot harder? (gravity well and all) And the difficulties of a Moon Mission dont apply for a Mars Mission?
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by dragnet53
Originally posted by debunky
Not talking about pics of the landing sites.
Left: JAXA data
Right: Apollo
Isnt it time for you to randomly declare victory again?
Edit to add: You got a vacation home up there? Cool! Can I come visit you one weekend?
[edit on 20-5-2010 by debunky]
Notice that the JAXA picture is a 3d picture of the scanned surface of the moon. Now if it was a scanned surface would it also scan the equipment since it is supposedly still on the surface?
[edit on 20-5-2010 by dragnet53]
What he doesn't want to acknowledge is the fact that NASA said they mapped the moon to choose landing sites. Who knows, maybe they also mapped the moon during apollo using unmanned craft and from there extrapolated data for their photo compositions.
Not to mention we have no idea what the DoD was up to.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by dragnet53
Yup. Perfect shots everytime.
I know they used the run and shoot method until they got a clean shot, but even those clean shots would still have bad shots.