It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by backinblack
I don't see how the two things you listed would help to keep the craft more stable.
You don't think being in zero atmosphere would allow the craft to move about more??
Atmospheric pressure IMO would hold the craft more steady, why do you think it wouldn't??
Donald Jacobson, Mitchell's lawyer, told Reuters: "Objects from the lunar trips to the moon were ultimately mounted and then presented to the astronauts as a gift after they had helped NASA on a mission."
However, NASA is saying that as it has no written record of the transfer of ownership, it should have it back.
Indeed, the Palm Beach Post says the government is being remarkably insistent in its filing. It quotes the papers as saying: "Defendant Edgar Mitchell is a former NASA employee who is exercising improper dominion and control over a NASA Data Acquisition Camera."
6-millimeter Maurer Data Acquisition Camera (DAC). Apollo 14 carried three Maurer Data Acquisition Cameras (DAC), one in the CM and two in the LM. The cameras were used for recording engineering data, continuous-sequence terrain photography, and lunar surface photography. The CM camera had lenses of 5-millimeter, 10-millimeter, 18-millimeter, and 75-millimeter focal lengths. One of the LM cameras was fitted with a 10-millimeter wide-angle lens, and one contained a battery power pack using a 5-millimeter lens. Accessories included a right-angled mirror, a power cable, a sextant adapter, and a CM boresight window bracket. The Mauer cameras weighed 2.8 pounds each, with a 140-foot film magazine attached. They had frame rates of 1, 6, and 12 frames per second automatic and 24 frames per second semiautomatic at all lens focal lengths, and shutter speeds of 1/60, 1/125, 1/500, and 1/1000 seconds, also at all lens focal lengths.
The camera was expected to fetch somewhere between $60,000 to $80,000, which doesn't seem a vast enough amount for NASA to toss a conniption.
Still, it is now up to a Miami court to suddenly decide who enjoys rightful ownership.
Mitchell himself told the Palm Beach Post that astronauts took dozens of items with them after a mission. He said the lunar module that he piloted was actually blown up, once it returned to Houston. He believes that the camera and other items in his possession--like a hand controller--are nothing more than "government junk."
He did admit to the Post that NASA had, in the past, asked for the camera back. He believed the matter had been laid to rest.
To the untrained, non-legal eye, this case might seem a little mean-spirited. Mitchell served his nation in an honorable manner. Why turn around after 40 years and claim he stole a camera?
Might it be something to do with the fact that Mitchell has expressed views that some regard as eccentric, such as claiming that aliens have better technology than humans?
And there are those of us, and I include astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell amongst our august number, who can attest than humans are, in psychological and technological terms, worms.
Dr. Mitchell, who was possessed of the gumption to set foot on Apollo 14 after the disaster of the previous mission, had the even greater gumption to reveal the truth about alien life to Kerrang Radio this week.
But he was swift to announce that presence by announcing that aliens are "little people who look strange to us."
The terrible, or perhaps great, news for techies is that Dr. Mitchell also revealed that our technology, and I believe he was including both Google and Facebook in this, is "not nearly as sophisticated" as that of aliens.
He added that the relief for all of us stuck here on this round, water-dominated wasteland is that aliens are generally a peaceable bunch, not the sort to invade foreign lands, mutilate the inhabitants and take advantage of their natural resources. Like Dan Rather, Kim Kardashian and Starbucks.
Strangely, Dr. Mitchell also claimed that governments over the last 60 years had covered up the aliens' visitations and their obvious technological superiority.
But not before he himself was "privileged enough to be in on the fact that we've been visited on this planet and the UFO phenomena is real".
"I've been in military and intelligence circles, who know that beneath the surface of what has been public knowledge, yes, we have been visited," he told Nick Margerrison, the Kerrang presenter.
Originally posted by backinblack
No one has said NASA couldn't get equipment to the moon, just man..
He means that fantastic technology that took him to the "moon"
And what does he mean they 'blew-up' the LM... I thought it crashed?
Wait... once it returned to Houston?
Had they not brought them back, they would have been destroyed, he said. After astronauts climbed back into the command module for the roughly 250,000-mile trip home, engineers in Houston blew up the lunar module, he said.
Apollo 12 astronaut Alan Bean, who was also a commander of Skylab 3 in 1973, said the rules changed, perhaps after Mitchell retired in 1972.
At some point, he estimated about 35 years ago, he and others were ordered to return anything they got in connection with their NASA duties. He recalled that he was forced to return a dagger and his wife to hand over a bracelet they received as gifts in Morocco when he and other astronauts took part in a worldwide goodwill tour.
"I gave all of my stuff back," he said. "I didn't have anything as good as a camera."
"It's just a tempest in a teapot," he said.
Strangely, Dr. Mitchell also claimed that governments over the last 60 years had covered up the aliens' visitations and their obvious technological superiority.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
He means that fantastic technology that took him to the "moon"
And what does he mean they 'blew-up' the LM... I thought it crashed?
Wait... once it returned to Houston?
FoosM, you really need to start checking primary sources instead of relying on secondary ones. This is what the original article says:
Had they not brought them back, they would have been destroyed, he said. After astronauts climbed back into the command module for the roughly 250,000-mile trip home, engineers in Houston blew up the lunar module, he said.
Palm Beach Post
Originally posted by MacTheKnife
Originally posted by backinblack
No one has said NASA couldn't get equipment to the moon, just man..
Sorry for going back a few pages but I'm curious. Is the above an admission that NASA did put equipment on the Moon back in the Apollo timeframe ? And if so, why would it have been impossible to do manned landings ? Or if not impossible, why would NASA have decided not to send people when they had the capability ?
So DJ, do you agree with this famous astronaut. A person whose testimony to landing on the moon you agree with, that the US government is aware of alien visitation?
Now DJ, how did the engineers at NASA blow up the LM? Where there explosives onboard?
Obviously, the reporter is misquoting what Mitchell actually said.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
So DJ, do you agree with this famous astronaut. A person whose testimony to landing on the moon you agree with, that the US government is aware of alien visitation?
Not particularly. I can honestly say I don't share his opinion
Now DJ, how did the engineers at NASA blow up the LM? Where there explosives onboard?
Obviously, the reporter is misquoting what Mitchell actually said.
Originally posted by Philthy53
All the Command modules are accounted for, NONE have been "blown up."
nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov...
All of the Apollo Lunar Modules, (LM's) were purposely crashed into the moon for seismic experimental reasons.
Phil
Well we've seen a few pics that appear to have a few pixels of something on them so maybe equipment got there..
Not sure why you even ask the difference between manned v's unmanned missions..
Machines can function in vastly more hostile conditions than man..
Originally posted by Philthy53
All the Command modules are accounted for, NONE have been "blown up."
nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov...
All of the Apollo Lunar Modules, (LM's) were purposely crashed into the moon for seismic experimental reasons.
Phil
Originally posted by MacTheKnife
Well we've seen a few pics that appear to have a few pixels of something on them so maybe equipment got there..
Not sure why you even ask the difference between manned v's unmanned missions..
Machines can function in vastly more hostile conditions than man..
Sure machines can but that doesn't mean man can't operate in the Moon's environment. I ask because I'm curious as to why it's so hard to believe that NASA can't put people on the Moon while at the same time believing that they could put equipment there.
Well lets simplify this.
Can NASA put men on MARS or VENUS?
Both planets supposedly had probes sent to them as well.
What in your opinion is taking so long for a Mars mission?
Originally posted by FoosM
How can you account for something that doesnt exist? Whether the blew it up or crash landed it. Its gone.
But assuming you follow the line that it was crash landed on the moon. Has NASA ever released any photos of the crash sites as evidence?
Well lets simplify this.
Can NASA put men on MARS or VENUS?
Both planets supposedly had probes sent to them as well.
What in your opinion is taking so long for a Mars mission?