It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Because he was asked if he could "see stars in the solar corona, in spite of the glare", from the surface, which would make it difficult to see the stars. The second quote was made about him being in space, on the way to the moon.
Originally posted by manmental
reply to post by wmd_2008
No doubt I missed the answer... but can someone tell me why Neil Armstrong says this to Patrick moore when asked if he could see stars...
...
Complete opposites. Why could that be?
We had to coordinate our times with Houston, since there was really no telling day from night in space. The sun was always shining, yet the sky around us was a constant black blanket dotted with millions of stars. One thing was certain: with each passing hour, the Earth was growing smaller and the moon was getting larger when we looked out our windows.
Oh good. Perhaps he can explain why he said the astronauts in 11 would receive the unshielded exposure. Perhaps you can. Perhaps certain parties can, if they would stop pretending the post didn't exist.
Originally posted by WWu777
Hi all,
Check out this interview with Jarrah White, the world's leading expert on the Moon Hoax Theory. It's 2 hours long but you can see how Jarrah has mastered the debate. He knows thousands of arguments both for and against the Moon Hoax Theory and seems to have memorized them all to the point where he can easily pull out the cards the refute any opposing arguments.
I just did. Now produce your source. Who said they were still using pure O2 after Apollo 11?
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by 000063
Incidentally, they abandoned a pure O2 atmo after Apollo 1. You seem to have misinterpreted whatever website you got that fact from from.
Oh really? Show me the evidence. And I dont know if you want to use a conspiracy site for it.
Is this what you're reduced to? Really? Scrambled from wherever they were when they needed to use the bathroom, is where.
Scrambled to the potty every time?
Scramble from where?
Over extended periods of time, yes. While uncomfortable, it's entirely possible to make it a few hours.
And sitting in your own poopy-pants is a health hazard.
film n 1: a form of entertainment that enacts a story by a sequence of images giving the illusion of continuous movement;
ENTERTAINMENT, n. Any kind of amusement whose inroads stop short of death by injection.
n 1: an account describing incidents or events; "a farfetched
narrative"; "after dinner he told the children stories
of his adventures" [syn: narration, narrative, tale,
recital, yarn]
2: a piece of fiction that narrates a chain of related events;
"he writes stories for the magazines"
With the way you and others respond to anyone that questions your God NASA, who can blame him??
Why would he come here and get insulted just for questioning??
That's what you guys do..
You started it... you seem to think a film is something that is shot on celluloid film.
I have told you that is not the case.
Videography refers to the process of capturing moving images on electronic media (e.g., videotape, hard disk, or solid state storage, streaming media). The term includes methods of electronic production and post production. It is the equivalent of cinematography, but with images recorded on electronic media instead of film stock.
3: broadcasting visual images of stationary or moving objects;
"Television is a medium because it is neither rare nor
well done" - Ernie Kovacs
Originally posted by 000063
Because he was asked if he could "see stars in the solar corona, in spite of the glare", from the surface, which would make it difficult to see the stars.
Originally posted by manmental
reply to post by wmd_2008
No doubt I missed the answer... but can someone tell me why Neil Armstrong says this to Patrick moore when asked if he could see stars...
...
Complete opposites. Why could that be?
a leading question is a question that suggests the answer or contains the information the examiner is looking for.
The second quote was made about him being in space, on the way to the moon.
I put more effort into this one post than you have exerted on this entire thread.
Any why do all three returning heroes look so goddam miserable at this conference? I've asked this question three times now to various Apollo OS believers and no-one has offered an opinion.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by manmental
You started it... you seem to think a film is something that is shot on celluloid film.
I have told you that is not the case.
Jarrah White is, at best, a videographer:
Videography refers to the process of capturing moving images on electronic media (e.g., videotape, hard disk, or solid state storage, streaming media). The term includes methods of electronic production and post production. It is the equivalent of cinematography, but with images recorded on electronic media instead of film stock.
Wikipedia
Originally posted by 000063
I just did. Now produce your source. Who said they were still using pure O2 after Apollo 11?
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by 000063
Incidentally, they abandoned a pure O2 atmo after Apollo 1. You seem to have misinterpreted whatever website you got that fact from from.
Oh really? Show me the evidence. And I dont know if you want to use a conspiracy site for it.
for Apollo 12, values given for cabin pressure are 4.8 psi, and for normal operating suit pressure, 3.8 psi. This suggests a pure oxygen environment for the Lunar Module.
Is this what you're reduced to? Really? Scrambled from wherever they were when they needed to use the bathroom, is where.
Scrambled to the potty every time?
Scramble from where?
Over extended periods of time, yes. While uncomfortable, it's entirely possible to make it a few hours.
And sitting in your own poopy-pants is a health hazard.
Originally posted by manmental
We were never able to see stars from the Lunar surface.
Yet Buzz Aldrin writes this in his book:"Magnificent Desolation" (chapter 1, page 8, hardback version)
The sun was always shining, yet the sky around us was a constant black blanket dotted with millions of stars.
Complete opposites. Why could that be?
Originally posted by 000063
why he said the astronauts in 11 would receive the unshielded exposure.[/url] Perhaps you can. Perhaps certain parties can, if they would stop pretending the post didn't exist.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by manmental
Any why do all three returning heroes look so goddam miserable at this conference? I've asked this question three times now to various Apollo OS believers and no-one has offered an opinion.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I get bored of answering the same ridiculous question over and over again... oh wait! You don't want an answer! It's completely rhetorical, isn't it?
I am sorry. I didn't see your previous answers. Thank you for making the effort. I find your reasoning very difficult to comprehend. They are no longer in a metal box or being bombarded by meteorites (that was a major problem wasn't it?). They are on Earth... safe... re-united with wives and families...