It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The question is entirely rhetorical. FoosM seems to have a habit of reflexively questioning each and every aspect of evidence presented by his opposition. However, if he's presenting the evidence, that means he has to accept it. To this end, he rarely produces evidence that he thinks would prove him wrong, which is intellectually dishonest. He rarely makes any actual assertions, relying on insinuating by relentlessly questioning.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
Originally posted by 000063
Say, FoosM, what is the thickness of the hull of the command module?
Have you tried using google?
Or is this a question that is being asked for effect?
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by weedwhacker
Allow me? If I may....(been following a bit, for last...oh, how many pages.....>sigh
Originally posted by 000063
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by weedwhacker
Allow me? If I may....(been following a bit, for last...oh, how many pages.....>sigh
Originally posted by 000063
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by weedwhacker
Allow me? If I may....(been following a bit, for last...oh, how many pages.....>sigh
did you ever think that maybe that's why he's NOT replying to your question .. because why answer someone when you can find it in 3secs.. DUH ~!!! you game is up .. so .. show us your results k? I'll be waiting ..
Originally posted by Komodo
Originally posted by 000063
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by weedwhacker
Allow me? If I may....(been following a bit, for last...oh, how many pages.....>sigh
Hang on...
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Komodo
did you ever think that maybe that's why he's NOT replying to your question .. because why answer someone when you can find it in 3secs.. DUH ~!!! you game is up .. so .. show us your results k? I'll be waiting ..
Actually his spamming is even sillier than that..
Hull thickness is only part of the equation, though as you state, any fool could find the info..
But we also need to know what kind of radiation it's shielding against and what the hull is made of..
The body of the spacecraft was constructed in a double layer separated by a thermal insulation layer. An inner pressure shell was formed from a lightweight, double skinned, alloy matrix and an outer skin, made from a honeycomb steel alloy doubled up as a heat shield and micro-meteorite protective layer.
You keep skipping over my posts: www.abovetopsecret.com... .012 inches. Now, would you say this would be proper shielding for going through the VABs? Would you trust getting a medical x-ray with shielding as thick as three layers of aluminum foil?
Originally posted by Komodo
reply to post by 000063
no he DID answer you .. but you either missed it or iggied it..
You keep skipping over my posts: www.abovetopsecret.com... .012 inches. Now, would you say this would be proper shielding for going through the VABs? Would you trust getting a medical x-ray with shielding as thick as three layers of aluminum foil?
012 inches
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Komodo
did you ever think that maybe that's why he's NOT replying to your question .. because why answer someone when you can find it in 3secs.. DUH ~!!! you game is up .. so .. show us your results k? I'll be waiting ..
Actually his spamming is even sillier than that..
Hull thickness is only part of the equation, though as you state, any fool could find the info..
But we also need to know what kind of radiation it's shielding against and what the hull is made of..
Why can't you remember posts from just two pages back?
My post that Weedwhacker responded to ACTUALLY mentioned Apollo 13..
Originally posted by backinblack
Originally posted by Komodo
reply to post by 000063
no he DID answer you .. but you either missed it or iggied it..
You keep skipping over my posts: www.abovetopsecret.com... .012 inches. Now, would you say this would be proper shielding for going through the VABs? Would you trust getting a medical x-ray with shielding as thick as three layers of aluminum foil?
012 inches
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by FoosM
Think about that. The absurdity of Apollo 13 knows no bounds.
I was shocked to see them in the lowly shielded LM without their full suits on for some added protection from radiation..
You would have thought that would be a given.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Komodo
I'd actually like to know what kept Apollo 17 cool for, I think it was 75 hours of direct sunlight...
That must of taken one hell of a good AC unit..
Not to mention how many times they vented the cool air to open the hatches..
IN APOLLO 13, even whilst using the LM as a "life-boat"....IF a threat, in the case of a seriously directional....IN THEIR DIRECTION ...CME event were to happen, they could have taken shelter, within the CM, in a matter of minutes.