It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So lets leave DJ out of this because he blew his story when he made the claims.
And blew his credibility when he continued to make such claims after it was shown to him that he was incorrect.
If the recording machine is at the same location as the responder, there will be no delay between a question and the response.
Originally posted by nataylor
Well, by undersea cable, Houston to Australia (14,000 km) would take about 0.05 seconds. Houston to Spain (8,000 km) would take about 0.03 seconds. Anywhere via geosynchronous satellite (74,000 km) would take about 0.25 seconds.
Originally posted by FoosM
We have it over the delay between earth and the moon.
The transmissions didnt always go directly to the USA (mission control), correct?
What was the delay between continents?
Spain to the US, and Australia to the US.
How much of a delay was added?
But it doesn't matter where the signal went, if it was ultimately being recorded at mission control. If the recording machine is at the same location as the responder, there will be no delay between a question and the response.
On telephone calls between continents that are routed via a geosynchronous satellite, the time between when one person stops speaking and then hears the other person reply is half a second. This can cause immense confusion if the other person starts speaking before the first has finished. It can take several sentences before the confusion is finally sorted out. Two-way digital communication between machines at high data rates suffers from this problem even more acutely, and protocols must be established which prevent conflicts arising
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
So lets leave DJ out of this because he blew his story when he made the claims.
And blew his credibility when he continued to make such claims after it was shown to him that he was incorrect.
Where was I shown to be incorrect? Isn't that the question you have been trying to avoid?
Whatever recording machine. It doesn't matter.
Originally posted by FoosM
You keep bringing up this recording machine.
What recording machine? And what does that have to do with communication between the
astronauts and mission control?
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
So lets leave DJ out of this because he blew his story when he made the claims.
And blew his credibility when he continued to make such claims after it was shown to him that he was incorrect.
Where was I shown to be incorrect? Isn't that the question you have been trying to avoid?
Back when you made your post.
Originally posted by DJW001
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by FoosM
So lets leave DJ out of this because he blew his story when he made the claims.
And blew his credibility when he continued to make such claims after it was shown to him that he was incorrect.
Where was I shown to be incorrect? Isn't that the question you have been trying to avoid?
Back when you made your post.
Perhaps you'd care to boost your own credibility a tad by linking to the post where it's proven that I was incorrect? If it's the post I think you're thinking about, I'm sure newcomers to this thread will find it both entertaining and enlightening.
Jarrah said that was the dose the astronauts would've received.
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by 000063
No. You're moving the goalposts. You're trying to make me prove JW is wrong all over again, instead of acknowledging the proven fact he said something incorrect, or my point about the shielding earlier. Whether it was deliberate or accidental I do not claim to know, but it happened.
So lets take this in small chunks to find out.
What inclination do you want to use, and what is the dose per hour?
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Jarrah flashed a source on screen. DJ looked it up, and found that the numbers Jarrah was quoting were the unshielded dose of radiation.
Found out? JW stated it. Nothing to find out.
Given that the maximun dose of radiation one can receive before dying is 500 rem, that means the astronauts would've received 1,333.34 rem, or 2.6 times the lethal dose, in the belts alone.
He wasn't. You're just in denial, trying to twist logic into a pretzel so that Jarrah wasn't wrong, because it means that you've been wrong for supporting him, and your ego can't take that idea.
So lets leave DJ out of this because he blew his story when he made the claims.
And blew his credibility when he continued to make such claims after it was shown to him that he was incorrect.
I did. Your cognitive bias is preventing you from understanding it.
End of story?
You quickly through around some words and conclude end of story?
You are not showing how you come to your conclusion.
No. Present information of your own to rebut me. Not Youtube videos. Actual facts. Stop trying to shift the burden of proof.
What dose did the astronauts receive, and what kind of shielding, and how thick would they need to block
that dose? Where do you get this information from?
Originally posted by nataylor
Whatever recording machine. It doesn't matter.
Originally posted by FoosM
You keep bringing up this recording machine.
What recording machine? And what does that have to do with communication between the
astronauts and mission control?
Where the recording machine is placed will affect where the delay shows up in the conversation.
If a guy in Houston hears an astronaut ask "Is it night time there?" He can answer immediately. If the recording machine is sitting next to the guy in Houston, it obviously doesn't record any delay between the astronaut's question and the answer from Houston. If the recording machine is on the spacecraft, it will record a delay because it takes 1.28 seconds for the astronaut's question to get to Earth and 1.28 seconds for the response to come back.
Question everything, present nothing, admit nothing. That's the FoosM way.
Originally posted by FoosM
You keep bringing up this recording machine.
What recording machine? And what does that have to do with communication between the
astronauts and mission control?
So you can't actually prove the post exists. Quelle surprise.
Originally posted by FoosM
You have a knack of finding posts very fast.
So Im sure you can find the rebuttals as well.
Originally posted by 000063
Jarrah said that was the dose the astronauts would've received.
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by 000063
No. You're moving the goalposts. You're trying to make me prove JW is wrong all over again, instead of acknowledging the proven fact he said something incorrect, or my point about the shielding earlier. Whether it was deliberate or accidental I do not claim to know, but it happened.
So lets take this in small chunks to find out.
What inclination do you want to use, and what is the dose per hour?
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Jarrah flashed a source on screen. DJ looked it up, and found that the numbers Jarrah was quoting were the unshielded dose of radiation.
Found out? JW stated it. Nothing to find out.
Timestamp 5:57
Given that the maximun dose of radiation one can receive before dying is 500 rem, that means the astronauts would've received 1,333.34 rem, or 2.6 times the lethal dose, in the belts alone.
That is the amount the Kovalev claimed the astronauts would receive unshielded. In other words, floating naked in space.
Originally posted by 000063
Question everything, present nothing, admit nothing. That's the FoosM way.
Originally posted by FoosM
You keep bringing up this recording machine.
What recording machine? And what does that have to do with communication between the
astronauts and mission control?
So you can't actually prove the post exists. Quelle surprise.
Originally posted by FoosM
You have a knack of finding posts very fast.
So Im sure you can find the rebuttals as well.
Then find the link.
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by 000063
Question everything, present nothing, admit nothing. That's the FoosM way.
Originally posted by FoosM
You keep bringing up this recording machine.
What recording machine? And what does that have to do with communication between the
astronauts and mission control?
So you can't actually prove the post exists. Quelle surprise.
Originally posted by FoosM
You have a knack of finding posts very fast.
So Im sure you can find the rebuttals as well.
Nice try in attempting to rewrite history.
I present more information, discussion points, analysis in one post than you have in all of yours.
Your mission is create distance and confusion from relevant posts by posting noise. You are not fooling anybody by doing so.
Wait a second, something's wrong...something's missing from your quote of my post.
Originally posted by FoosM
So what exactly is the problem with what JW stated?
Now go further, you have the 1,333.34 rem.
What kind of radiation is it?
What material would stop it and how thick would it have to be?
No. Present information of your own to rebut me. Not Youtube videos. Actual facts. Stop trying to shift the burden of proof.
In fact, I challenge you to find the thickness of the skin of the crafts, if you don't think it was survivable.
No, your example was from the transcripts, which were made from recordings made here on Earth. Hence, no delay between the end of the astronaut talking and Houston responding.
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by nataylor
Whatever recording machine. It doesn't matter.
Originally posted by FoosM
You keep bringing up this recording machine.
What recording machine? And what does that have to do with communication between the
astronauts and mission control?
Where the recording machine is placed will affect where the delay shows up in the conversation.
If a guy in Houston hears an astronaut ask "Is it night time there?" He can answer immediately. If the recording machine is sitting next to the guy in Houston, it obviously doesn't record any delay between the astronaut's question and the answer from Houston. If the recording machine is on the spacecraft, it will record a delay because it takes 1.28 seconds for the astronaut's question to get to Earth and 1.28 seconds for the response to come back.
Yes so, the example I gave the audio was coming from the spacecraft.
Yet we didnt hear a delay when Houston answered.
Originally posted by nataylor
No, your example was from the transcripts, which were made from recordings made here on Earth. Hence, no delay between the end of the astronaut talking and Houston responding.
Originally posted by FoosM
Originally posted by nataylor
Whatever recording machine. It doesn't matter.
Originally posted by FoosM
You keep bringing up this recording machine.
What recording machine? And what does that have to do with communication between the
astronauts and mission control?
Where the recording machine is placed will affect where the delay shows up in the conversation.
If a guy in Houston hears an astronaut ask "Is it night time there?" He can answer immediately. If the recording machine is sitting next to the guy in Houston, it obviously doesn't record any delay between the astronaut's question and the answer from Houston. If the recording machine is on the spacecraft, it will record a delay because it takes 1.28 seconds for the astronaut's question to get to Earth and 1.28 seconds for the response to come back.
Yes so, the example I gave the audio was coming from the spacecraft.
Yet we didnt hear a delay when Houston answered.
Originally posted by 000063
Wait a second, something's wrong...something's missing from your quote of my post.
Originally posted by FoosM
So what exactly is the problem with what JW stated?
Now go further, you have the 1,333.34 rem.
What kind of radiation is it?
What material would stop it and how thick would it have to be?
No. Present information of your own to rebut me. Not Youtube videos. Actual facts. Stop trying to shift the burden of proof.
In fact, I challenge you to find the thickness of the skin of the crafts, if you don't think it was survivable.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Put up, DodgM. How thick was the skin of the Apollo 11 craft in the official story, and how much would it have reduced the radiation the astronauts got, if at all?
I'm not going into the type of radiation,
Originally posted by FoosM
No Nat, I gave two examples from actual videos.
One video you claimed that it could have been edited.
The other, you didnt say anything when I asked, if the sound we heard from the live transmission came from the spacecraft.
Originally posted by nataylor
Originally posted by FoosM
No Nat, I gave two examples from actual videos.
One video you claimed that it could have been edited.
The other, you didnt say anything when I asked, if the sound we heard from the live transmission came from the spacecraft.
Sorry, I really don't get what you are saying, nor do I understand why you can't seem to grasp this concept.
All of the TV signals, and all of the audio (except the onboard voice recorders, which you rarely hear due to limited coverage and low quality), was recorded here on Earth.
"Live" TV video and the audio were recorded here on Earth. Recordings of mission control responding to the astronauts were recorded here on Earth. So none of that stuff is going to show a delay between when the astronauts ask something and when mission control can respond.