It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Young Aussie genius whipping NASA in Moon Hoax Debate!

page: 445
377
<< 442  443  444    446  447  448 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 4 2011 @ 05:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by FoosM

True that other nations have, as I mentioned in a previous post; true that another nation has landed on the moon;


So now wait a minute.
Ruserious8D has stated that other nations have landed men on the moon?


No. He. Hasn't.



Incredible.


Incredible that you would think he said so when he didn't.


edit on 4-5-2011 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 4 2011 @ 05:51 PM
link   

edit on 4-5-2011 by HawkMan11 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 06:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by FoosM


When Jarrah claimed that E. E. Kovalev's data contradicted NASA's, even though it actually confirmed it, was he lying? Yes or no?


What was contradicted?
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Amazing how short your memory is, especially since I bought it up AGAIN not twenty pages back.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

edit on 2011/5/4 by 000063 because: +



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 07:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by 000063

Originally posted by FoosM


When Jarrah claimed that E. E. Kovalev's data contradicted NASA's, even though it actually confirmed it, was he lying? Yes or no?


What was contradicted?
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Amazing how short your memory is, especially since I bought it up AGAIN not twenty pages back.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

edit on 2011/5/4 by 000063 because: +


dont just post links
explain the stated contradiction



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 09:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by FoosM


True that other nations have, as I mentioned in a previous post; true that another nation has landed on the moon; true that moon rocks can be compared with moon rocks--in fact, they prefer it that way. Now I've answered your questions, so you answer mine.



So now wait a minute.
Ruserious8D has stated that other nations have landed men on the moon?
Incredible.





Another independent nation, or group has been able to land on the moon.
Answer?


Yes, you never clarified whether or not they were manned missions, so I answered the vague question you asked. It's your fault for not specifying. I don't like to ASSUME what you meant to ask, so I simply answered the question as it was presented. If you don't like the answer, change the question.





that wasnt even my question.
Should have gone to sleep first then answer my questions.




Moon rocks brought back from the Apollo missions could be compared with other moon rocks that geologists found prior to the missions.
True or False?


What kind of answer were you expecting? You simply asked a true or false question--did you want me to answer "false"? What are we supposed to compare moon rocks with?


And the other questions weren't touched.
And here I thought he was all about the debate.
LOL.


Yes, I thought this would be a debate as well, but how do your vague, virtually yes/no questions promote debate?

And you are in no position to speak about answering questions, because this entire thread (not just with me) you have failed to answer any questions presented to you.



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 09:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by FoosM

dont just post links
explain the stated contradiction


Ironic you ask that of him. How often do you thoroughly explain the links or videos you post? If you demand it from us, keep in mind that you will also be held to this standard.
edit on 4-5-2011 by ruserious8D because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 09:42 PM
link   
When I lurked I found this thread a few months back.This guy is a genius., or as a member said many pages back, he's autistic. My cousin is autistic and he resembles this guy, especially the way he talks. as if his words are coming out like "Heymynameisjeff'. As I'm writing this I just see somthing flying in the sky then take off at speed... omg...



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 09:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by R3N3G4D3
When I lurked I found this thread a few months back.This guy is a genius., or as a member said many pages back, he's autistic. My cousin is autistic and he resembles this guy, especially the way he talks. as if his words are coming out like "Heymynameisjeff'. As I'm writing this I just see somthing flying in the sky then take off at speed... omg...


If you're speaking of Jarrah--I couldn't care less of how he speaks, but what he says is so misguided that it's as if he's kidding.



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 09:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by R3N3G4D3
When I lurked I found this thread a few months back.This guy is a genius., or as a member said many pages back, he's autistic. My cousin is autistic and he resembles this guy, especially the way he talks. as if his words are coming out like "Heymynameisjeff'. As I'm writing this I just see somthing flying in the sky then take off at speed... omg...


When I lurked?


Another NEW member that seems to know a 300 page thread better than me...
Amazing...Maybe in a past life you were in this thread ??



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 09:53 PM
link   
reply to post by ruserious8D
 


He does seem like he knows whats up with the moon landings though. I'm on the fence personally, there's arguments on both sides that just make my head spin.

Jarrah's counter attacks on the people who doubt him really piss me off. Why doesn't he just ignore them and state more stuff? I dunno what to think...

What's your opinion of him?



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 09:54 PM
link   
reply to post by ruserious8D
 


We don't need you to point out the "useless rant," we only need you to address the evidence that was given. If you don't like the ranting, then simply don't read it and just dispute the evidence given instead of aiming personal attacks while dodging the relevant evidence present.


Another NEW member..How sweet....

BTW, don't tell me what to do mate...
You hit your keys and I'll hit mine..


BTW, who were you in a past life?



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 09:55 PM
link   
reply to post by backinblack
 


That's weird you say that, my old username was Ren DMC and I read this thread everyday lol. You sir are a wizard of psychic abilities. Whats your opinon of Jarrah? Nutcase or Clever S.O.B.



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 09:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack

Originally posted by R3N3G4D3
When I lurked I found this thread a few months back.This guy is a genius., or as a member said many pages back, he's autistic. My cousin is autistic and he resembles this guy, especially the way he talks. as if his words are coming out like "Heymynameisjeff'. As I'm writing this I just see somthing flying in the sky then take off at speed... omg...


When I lurked?


Another NEW member that seems to know a 300 page thread better than me...
Amazing...Maybe in a past life you were in this thread ??


How is being a new member relevant? So just because we haven't been members for long we haven't been reading it?

It's the arguments that we present now that matter, so you could have been here 10 years before us and it wouldn't matter if you still can't come up with one long-standing argument.



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 10:02 PM
link   
reply to post by ruserious8D
 


Slow clap... well said sir. It'd be funny as crap if a new member was Stephen Hawking or a wizard of science and people are like awww he's new he doesn't know crap.

Sorry Mr Backinblack but you seem a bit of a dick toward new members



posted on May, 4 2011 @ 10:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by R3N3G4D3
reply to post by ruserious8D
 


He does seem like he knows whats up with the moon landings though. I'm on the fence personally, there's arguments on both sides that just make my head spin.

Jarrah's counter attacks on the people who doubt him really piss me off. Why doesn't he just ignore them and state more stuff? I dunno what to think...

What's your opinion of him?


I really am not fond of him, speaking kindly. He knowingly misleads people, and by that, I mean that he doesn't address his expertise (or as I believe lack thereof) and doesn't bring credible analysts to back his theories.

He has only actually PROVEN that getting to the moon would be hard or how it could be recreated (poorly) on earth. He refuses to retract his debunked theories and he childishly rebukes his opponents.

I don't judge "truth-seekers" by anything but the substance of their arguments; he just happens to not have any convincing ones to dispute.
edit on 4-5-2011 by ruserious8D because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 5 2011 @ 12:29 AM
link   
reply to post by R3N3G4D3
 



Sorry Mr Backinblack but you seem a bit of a dick toward new members


Whatever....
I just find it odd that very recently 3 or 4 new members have joined and concentrated on this thread..
They all seem to have an intricate knowledge of the threads activity to date..

It is a conspiracy site ya know..



posted on May, 5 2011 @ 12:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by R3N3G4D3
 



Sorry Mr Backinblack but you seem a bit of a dick toward new members


Whatever....
I just find it odd that very recently 3 or 4 new members have joined and concentrated on this thread..
They all seem to have an intricate knowledge of the threads activity to date..

It is a conspiracy site ya know..


Perhaps, but not everything is a conspiracy, so let's stick to the subject at hand and focus on what you believe is the REAL conspiracy.



posted on May, 5 2011 @ 12:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by ruserious8D

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by R3N3G4D3
 



Sorry Mr Backinblack but you seem a bit of a dick toward new members


Whatever....
I just find it odd that very recently 3 or 4 new members have joined and concentrated on this thread..
They all seem to have an intricate knowledge of the threads activity to date..

It is a conspiracy site ya know..

I've stated before which aspects of the landings I ave problems with..
I've also stated that both sides of the debate lie and deceive to suit their agenda..
Perhaps, but not everything is a conspiracy, so let's stick to the subject at hand and focus on what you believe is the REAL conspiracy.


I've stated before which aspects of the landings I have problems with..
I've also stated that both sides of the debate lie and deceive to suit their agenda..



posted on May, 5 2011 @ 02:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by ruserious8D

Originally posted by FoosM


True that other nations have, as I mentioned in a previous post; true that another nation has landed on the moon; true that moon rocks can be compared with moon rocks--in fact, they prefer it that way. Now I've answered your questions, so you answer mine.



So now wait a minute.
Ruserious8D has stated that other nations have landed men on the moon?
Incredible.





Another independent nation, or group has been able to land on the moon.
Answer?


Yes, you never clarified whether or not they were manned missions, so I answered the vague question you asked. It's your fault for not specifying. I don't like to ASSUME what you meant to ask, so I simply answered the question as it was presented. If you don't like the answer, change the question.



Yeah whatever, the question wasn't vague.
You probably just thought the russians landed men... or was it the chinese?

We are talking about the impossibility of manned moon landings.
We are not talking about if Surveyor or Luna happened.

When people say moon hoax, people understand that means Apollo,
not that the moon doesn't exist.
You could have also simply asked me to clarify the question if you weren't sure.
Or even clarify your answer!
Instead you prefer to waste time.
LOL.






Moon rocks brought back from the Apollo missions could be compared with other moon rocks that geologists found prior to the missions.
True or False?


What kind of answer were you expecting? You simply asked a true or false question--did you want me to answer "false"? What are we supposed to compare moon rocks with?


How I want you to answer?
Whats this, a set up to claim later I forced you to answer a certain way?
Just give me your answer.
Is your answer 'false'?

And what about Apollo 12 SEVA.
Did it happen?



posted on May, 5 2011 @ 02:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by ruserious8D

Originally posted by FoosM

dont just post links
explain the stated contradiction


Ironic you ask that of him. How often do you thoroughly explain the links or videos you post? If you demand it from us, keep in mind that you will also be held to this standard.
edit on 4-5-2011 by ruserious8D because: (no reason given)


Ironic you are butting into other conversations and not finishing your own.
LOL.
And just for you info, I looked at the links, saw nothing that related to his question or his point.
Did you, can you explain his question?




top topics



 
377
<< 442  443  444    446  447  448 >>

log in

join