Why do you waste your time researching such a stupid thing?
Why do people do what they do? Everyone enjoys something in life and there is a great variety of things out there to enjoy and just because you say it
isnt so, doesnt mean a thing to me or anyone else that enjoys the topic. You saying this or that is stupid, is your opinion, nothing more.
As I said, next time pass up a topic that you find "stupid" and spare the people that actually enjoy the topic the useless drivel.
There has been legends about Bigfoot in My area tho the most Talked about Legend is sometimes Taboos of even mentioning them and most protected
Legend is the the Little People just think Leprechauns , and Fairy's ,, this was way before even legends of Europe and the rest of the OLD World
Giants , Pixies , brownies, fairy's ETC.... were known in North America
but then again just about every country has a tale of a Bigfoot and a Little People as just like the Unicorn and Dragons
Early & Present Native American Knowledge of my area
I made a Thread while back about The Mountain Lions are coming back to upper state NY right in my area as the Cougars were wiped out 150 years ago
until they found tracks and fur blood urine to prove they exist Roaming around in the North Country
2 years before there were
Rumor's were going around on the reservation that either a Bigfoot ! Hominid , a Werewolf ,or a Cougar attacked a Lincoln Town Car
Fender to get at either a Cat or a Rabbit on the reservation of ST Regis/Akwesasne the results of what caused the fender to be torn apart were from
the samples of the Fur and Blood the Blood and fur turned out to be from a Rabbit the joke it was either the Killer Rabbit of Monty Pythons Holy
Grail or Giant Rabbits like in night of the Lupus
Bigfoot do exist !!!!!! there the Hominid ! mistaken called Early Man or Missing link Fossils Bones go watch some Lloyd Pye Videos on You Tube
here ill put here the first 2 clips of Human Origins by Lloyd Pye
Human Origins : Intervention Theory by Lloyd Pye 1/8
Human Origins : Intervention Theory by Lloyd Pye 2/8
The link given for the source by the article in the OP's post (here) has a more recent
entry in which Mr. Matt Moneymaker (who is really not doing himself any favors with that name) pretty much declares outright that what is seen in this
film clip is "a crew member directing the herd toward the dramatic center of the shot".
This really doesn't need to remain among the touted "top-flagged" threads on ATS. It wasn't an intentional fraud, but it's sure not Bigfoot.
Why do you waste your time researching such a stupid thing? Thats really what it comes down to. Even if "Big Foot" was real then how the h*ll
does it effect your life? Did you change someone else life from your post? If so good for you,otherwise research something that ACTUALLY effects
your life DIRECTLY like corporate greed or some type of scientific phenomenon. Enjoy melting your brain on worthless topics
i dunno, from someone with george carlin as their avatar, i figured this question should be pretty obvious.
bigfoot would prove darwin's evolutionary theory true for humanity, seeing he's touted as the missing link, and would/should disprove the
creationist idea, and likely the interventionist theory.
Yeah the blu ray high def is unbelievable. It's truly amazing to see something explained that quick and easy.
What would we do with out the internet?? Really makes you wonder when you see something like this, that might have taken ten years to debunk back in
the 70s or 80s.(that is if the film makers decided not to admit to it)
Thanks for the vids, intriguing, when I saw Lucy I did some research, and found that Lucy(Australopithecus afarensis) was only 1.1 m (3 feet 6
inches), and as she is not referred to as a child, she must be regarded as either adolescent or adult,(can't find the info), yet the Taung Child
(Australopithecus africanus) is believed to have been about 3 years old at the time of its death. It was a creature standing 3' 6".
This seems strange to me, how an adolescent or adult can be the same height as a 3 year old?... hmmmm?
By the way I found the rucksack that bigfoot is carrying,
I just downloaded the 1080i version from one of our favorite pirating websites. I must say that viewing it in such a high resolution would normally
help solve the debate, but it hasn't. At least not for me. Which is why I cut out the scene and uploaded it for all of you to view for yourself.
You must have a fairly powerful computer to view this, one thats at least 5 years old or newer. Also you will need a good video player, my favorite
is Media Player Classic with all the codecs preinstalled.
I was able to watch the video with VLC. That was really a good view. I watched twice and that is clearly a person with a pack on him. I'd like that
job getting to see this scene in person and up close.
I dont really see a Bear, which some people are saying they see.
If the person in the video didnt mention a "backpack" I dont think I would of noticed anything. I also cant say for sure that I see it as a
Very interesting video, thanks for posting.
Im going to watch the video/video's more and see if I can pick anything else up.
Whne I saw the picture I thought it was a black bear, or maybe even a grizzly, but when watching the video clip it is obvious it stands upright and
runs in two legs.
Yes, the film needs to be analyzed, and the crew who filmed this needs to be contacted.
The claim made in the OP that someone in the crew is bound to see the posts online is just too optimistic, and sorry to say they might not be watching
the net about this at all, so it is better if they are contacted.
I doubt you'd be taking shots at night during the summer in the far north. I think that the color choice was a personal choice, or maybe it was
chosen by the film crew so that the crew could be easily spotted. I imagine a lot of the people on the crew were not wilderness pros, but were chosen
because of their knowledge of the film industry.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.