Was Bigfoot Captured On IMAX film?, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 52 times


reply posted on 30-4-2010 @ 10:43 AM by lee anoma
Originally posted by tyranny22
reply to
post by lee anoma



The human must have been running a recon mission for MI6. Because he's decked out head to toe in black (ski-mask and all).

Maybe he was protecting her Majesty's caribou? Or at least, trying to figure out the caribou's contact?

I guess it could have been part of the film crew. But, that won't be too hard to figure out, huh? Just ask the people on that shoot, "hey, which one of you is the one that was stalking the caribou when we filmed this segment?"


You're right, it's not a human passerby or a human working on the film.

It's a mythical Gorilla-Man-Skunk-Ape that no one seems to be able to adequately catch in a photo or on film, the ones that have admitted to faking or were revealed as frauds, and science has failed to acknowledge as actually having existed at all.

Yeah that is more reasonable.

My mistake.

Case Solved?
Not yet. Sounds like someone has some footwork before this can be cleared up.


Nah, it's a man and he isn't in a ski-mask just a dark shirt and a backpack that is not out of the norm for someone to wear.

People that don't want to be seen on a film because they aren't supposed to be in the shot, especially those working on it behind the scenes, tend to duck and hide but occasionally get caught on camera. Hence his attempt to avoid being seen.

As far as I know the people that have filmed this haven't released a statement and may not be aware of this blooper (or don't see it as being worth acknowledging) but since you seem to think it is so easy to "just ask them", why don't you give the director a personal call.

Ask him if Bigfoot was on the crew that day.

- Lee



reply posted on 30-4-2010 @ 10:43 AM by Josephus23
reply to post by -Blackout-



The image is entirely too out of focus to make out any type of animal.

I would think that the only possible way to settle this would be to contact the directing team and ask them to enhance the original IMAX footage.

I would like to add that I would not get my hopes up.

Do you think that even if the assumption is correct and this is a "Bigfoot" type creature that the producers of this movie would let some observant person from the outside take the credit for spotting this?

If and when we see the "blown up" and "enhanced" version of the actual figure, my hopes are not high that it will pan out.

Not that I think that it is a black bear, but because I do not believe that TPTB would allow news like this to happen.

The director does not own the rights to the movie.

More than likely a subsidiary of a very, very, very, very large production company, who actually owns the rights, made this movie, and I do not see this as being something that would be of benefit to TPTB.


reply posted on 30-4-2010 @ 10:50 AM by Rasputin13
Ok, after watching the first video in the OP, I was open to the possibility that this was in fact a sasquatch or at least some type of unknown primate.

However, after watching the slowed down and zoomed-in Blue-ray version that someone was kind enough to post, it is clear IMO that this is in fact a human. I don't know if he is a cameraman as I cannot make out a camera, or whether he is part of the film crew or just some random outdoorsman. But, to me at least, it is obviously a human.

He appears to be dressed entirely in black or a similar dark color. You can see that he is wearing a long sleeve shirt/jacket and pants. When he turns his head to the side you can see his white face and distinguish the brim of his dark baseball cap. When he sticks his hand up, possibly to wave, you can see that it is clearly white and you can make out where his dark shirt sleeve ends and his hand begins. He is carrying a large backpack on his back. It almost looks like the kind of backpack that a person who plans on hiking and sleeping out in the wild for a while would wear, as it appears to rise almost to the top of his head. I can't say if he was there to guide the animals or film them from another location or what. To me, his motive for being there is a moot point.

I am disappointed that this appears to be a human. I personally believe that sasquatch/bigfoot/whatever are real and are living in the wilderness of North America, and possibly elsewhere. But this is not footage of bigfoot and any objective person viewing the Blue-ray footage should be able to see that. He is clearly standing up, walking a short distance sideways (sort of like a basketball player playing defense would step side to side), and then squats down to either hide from the animals or not be seen in the shot.

The bottom line is that if you want to see a bigfoot in this video then you are probably going to see one. Most of us here are so determined to find any evidence of this creature's existence that we sometimes put aside our otherwise sound and rational judgement because we have this insatiable appetite to prove to everyone else what we have known ourselves all along- that sasquatch is real. I don't think there is any hoax here or any ill intention. This is just a case of someone seeing something that they believe to be a sasquatch, but which in reality is just a guy.

That's just my two cents, or in this case my two dollars, since I rambled on way more than I intended!


reply posted on 30-4-2010 @ 10:53 AM by Helmkat
reply to post by lee anoma



Funny but I don't see a backpack at all.

Sorry, just don't.


reply posted on 30-4-2010 @ 10:55 AM by ararisq
reply to post by Rasputin13



It is clearly a human, more so from the full speed video than from the zoomed in slow speed. The movement is 100% human and not ape like at all. Whether the person is decked out all in black is not conclusive. I think it would be quite possible that he was wearing blue or purple or other dark colors and it just appears black due to the distance and number of colors in the shot.


reply posted on 30-4-2010 @ 11:00 AM by Helmkat
reply to post by Helmkat



I've watched a few more times, looking pretty hard at the image. I stand corrected sir!

Its Human.


reply posted on 30-4-2010 @ 11:15 AM by lee anoma
reply to post by Helmkat



Yes, as I said its harder to see in the OP video (and even I was curious as to what it was) but the Blueray kills all doubt.

This is from BFRO.

The Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization (Founded in 1995 -- The only scientific research organization exploring the bigfoot/sasquatch mystery).

They claim to be:
"a virtual community of scientists, journalists, and specialists from diverse backgrounds. The researchers who compose the BFRO are engaged in projects, including field and laboratory investigations, designed to address various aspects of the bigfoot phenomenon. As a result of the education and experience of its members and the quality of their efforts, the BFRO is widely considered as the most credible and respected investigative network involved in the study of this subject."

Great North Figure in Blu-Ray (on LED TV) appears to be Human

UPDATE !! (10:45AM PST, January 13, 2010):

Wally Hersom received the Blu-Ray version of the DVD. He played it on his high-end Blu-Ray player, on his enormous state-of-the-art LED extra large screen television. He moved up close to the screen and noticed more details in the figure than he had seen before -- more details than in any of the versions that have been posted so far on YouTube. Of course, this is not IMAX resolution, but it is noticeably different than what others had acheived so far on Hi-Def televisions. Compare the two clips below your yourself. The one on the left is the one Wally videotaped last night, where I am pointing at the figure.

As you can more easily see, in "Blu-Ray+LED," the Great North figure appears more human-like than sasquatch-like. It appears to be an agile human wearing a uniformly dark, form-fitting clothing ensemble, including a dark face covering, and a small, snug, dark-colored backpack (which made the GNF appear larger).
BFRO



That's not Bigfoot it's a man, baby!

- Lee


[edit on 30-4-2010 by lee anoma]


reply posted on 30-4-2010 @ 11:20 AM by Josephus23
reply to post by lee anoma



What you are typing is a stretch and your willingness to attribute a gender to the black blob in question exemplifies your confirmation bias.


reply posted on 30-4-2010 @ 11:25 AM by Josephus23
reply to post by lee anoma



How can anyone say that something appears more "human-like" than "sasquatch-like"?

Could you please post a link that describes, in detail, what exactly is "sasquatch-like"?

Do we have any earthly idea what a sasquatch is?

Please see this link on confirmation bias.


reply posted on 30-4-2010 @ 11:29 AM by lee anoma
Originally posted by Josephus23
reply to
post by lee anoma



What you are typing is a stretch and your willingness to attribute a gender to the black blob in question exemplifies your confirmation bias.


Sorry but I disagree.
I have nothing to gain from this either way and I did state it was a "human" figure.

I just used the term "guy" "him" or "man" loosely, I could have been more specific and said "it" because I honestly can't tell the gender, but if you want to call it a "female" human I won't stop you.

Just as long as you know it IS a human in the shot and not a Gorilla or a Bigfoot.

It is hardly a stretch too when you view the image in a higher resolution from the Blueray copy.

At first I wasn't sure what the object in the image was because the first video in the thread was pretty crappy and at a distance, but after seeing the Blueray and recognizing it as a human being I'd be a fool to continue to believe otherwise.

As I said above the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization have concluded from the Blueray that this is a human being caught on camera by accident.

You telling me they are also biased or is it possible they (and I) have a point?

- Lee


reply posted on 30-4-2010 @ 11:32 AM by stereologist
reply to post by nh_ee



So you think that this is anything but a human because he's not carrying a weapon?

Ever been up there in the wilds with the wildlife? It's a great experience. You should try it.

Sounds like a Foxworthy comment, "You just be a redneck if you think everything in the woods without a rifle in its hands just might be a bigfoot."


reply posted on 30-4-2010 @ 11:40 AM by Josephus23
reply to post by lee anoma



What I am stating is a basic point of research science.

And that is... point blank...

"do not speculate beyond the data".

I am neither a believer nor a debunker of this story.

Quoting a Bigfoot research team does not give any credence to anything posted, thus my askance for a link to a description of what exactly is "Sasquatch-like".

All too often on ATS, I see people who use very weak evidence for CONFIRMATION and that is not how the research process is intended to work.

I am not here to stand up for the OP.

I do not know what is being discussed in the OP.

I am here to stand up for the integrity of the research process.

Only three possible outcomes can manifest:

Confirmed.

De-bunked.

I DO NOT KNOW.

Edit to add:

I am not debating the OP.

What I am debating are statements like this


Just as long as you know it IS a human in the shot and not a Gorilla or a Bigfoot.


How can one know that something is NOT a bigfoot?

That would mean that one would have to know what a "bigfoot" is.

[edit on 4/30/2010 by Josephus23]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



ohio bigfoot carrying a stick
  Posted 17 days ago with 17 member flags
FB - Find Bigfoot announcement: "HUGE" new video coming Sept 10
  Posted 2 days ago with 8 member flags
Huge, Hairy Giant Reported by Trio, Reviving Legend
  Posted 9 days ago with 7 member flags
Actual Bigfoot Footage!!??!!
  Posted 4 days ago with 4 member flags
"Sasquatch" They are real! Are they really here?
  Posted 16 days ago with 3 member flags
Rocky Mountains Sasquatch photo
  Posted 9 days ago with 3 member flags
The Texas Blue Dog
  Posted 8 days ago with 3 member flags
GIANT worm found in China
  Posted 5 days ago with 3 member flags

ATS Live North America is broadcasting now.
Today's Show: ATS Live:161:Trees,Ghosts,Phantom 'Copters,Pshop,Teaching,Jail,Violence,MajorTom,Animals,