It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Baby boy survives for nearly two days after abortion

page: 2
30
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 09:57 AM
link   
May he rest in peace with the keeper of souls safe in the arms of God. We who are born take a chance on growing into sinners and so risk purgatory and even hell. Not so with this babe. This child sinless goes straight to God and Heaven. It is what I believe.

Now if we could only find out where these kids are....

www.missingkids.com...




posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 10:24 AM
link   
reply to post by Blanca Rose
 


I agree somebody really screw up on this one, I also agree that abortion too late in a pregnancy if not linked to possible death to the mother and severe fetus deformities and abnormalities should no be contemplated, adoption is a better choice.



posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 10:42 AM
link   
The Survivors of Abortion

joseromia.tripod.com...

www.youtube.com...





[edit on 103030p://bFriday2010 by Stormdancer777]



posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 12:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Raist
 


Dear I careless about the bashing BS, I am too old to get bothered by pro choices promoters and their agendas.

The reality of "premature children born as early as 22 weeks" is statistic no an opinion plain and simple, if somebody had the miracle of having a child surviving that early in birth then they are to find themselves in a lot of medical and expensive care for the child lives.

When it comes to abortion the key is not having a "fetus" survive that is not the intention of an abortion.

Again plain and simple, by Article somebody screw up and the fetus survive tragically for two days.

that is what the story is about, no about stories of pretty littler babies surviving a premature birth to live cute lives with parents that care.

That is not what I care in this thread at all.



posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 12:46 PM
link   
reply to post by anon72
 


How about that Mother! If a person wants to have a kid, but aborts it because they will be disabled...well, then they should be allowed to have another child...anyway, I digress because I am sure that my statement will start a choice vs. life issue.

Nothing to see here...please move along



posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 12:48 PM
link   
reply to post by marg6043
 


Nor was I bashing those who have abortions nor trying to convince those people otherwise. You brought up abortion bashing. I simply pointed that there are those who have lived (more than one by the way) when you said it was not possible. I was correcting the ignorance you professed. I was proving that there are those who have survived before 25 weeks.

Take it for what you wish. You were in error and I simply corrected you with facts not opinion.


Raist



posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 01:13 PM
link   
But it's not a baby...it's a "fetus".


This is why I HATE...yes...I HATE people who support abortions.

They are the most disgusting people in the world to me...I don't even have words.

I'm usually a pretty accepting person...believe whatever you want...do whatever you want that doesn't harm another human...but people who support abortions and use the arguement of it not being a human but being a "fetus"...I seriously have not one bit of love for them...none at all.

I'm not perfect...I'm not God...I am a flawed creature...and I wish I didn't have to...but I do hate these people.


And don't give me that "it's my choice" BS...you had a choice...BEFORE you decided to have sex. If you aren't ready to have a baby...close your damn legs. If you are willing to have an abortion...do us all a favor and get your tubes tied during the abortion...why would a child want to be raised by a mother who killed their sibling.


I don't care if this gets removed...this just ruined my day. FTW.



posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 01:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by marg6043
reply to post by Raist
 


Dear I careless about the bashing BS, I am too old to get bothered by pro choices promoters and their agendas.

, if somebody had the miracle of having a child surviving that early in birth then they are to find themselves in a lot of medical and expensive care for the child lives.



I think the word agenda is lame first of all. Second, you make it sound like a BAD thing! OH those pro life people and their agenda to save lives. pshh they are sooo stupid. Just like doctors, who are they to save lives...

and on the second part, i literally cant believe you just said that. anyone who decides not to have a child bc it would be expensive is heartless. I wasnt exactly the most healthy baby when i was born and my parents were dirt poor. I am glad they didnt decide not to have me bc it would be a lot of expensive medical billing.

I understand that sometimes things happen and it could be harmful to the mother and other special cases that make it tough to decide. but because it might be expensive!? geez.



posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 01:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
But it's not a baby...it's a "fetus".


This is why I HATE...yes...I HATE people who support abortions.

They are the most disgusting people in the world to me...I don't even have words.

I'm usually a pretty accepting person...believe whatever you want...do whatever you want that doesn't harm another human...but people who support abortions and use the arguement of it not being a human but being a "fetus"...I seriously have not one bit of love for them...none at all.

I'm not perfect...I'm not God...I am a flawed creature...and I wish I didn't have to...but I do hate these people.


And don't give me that "it's my choice" BS...you had a choice...BEFORE you decided to have sex. If you aren't ready to have a baby...close your damn legs. If you are willing to have an abortion...do us all a favor and get your tubes tied during the abortion...why would a child want to be raised by a mother who killed their sibling.


I don't care if this gets removed...this just ruined my day. FTW.


I have to ask you....do you also hate soldiers fighting for the freedom of our country or is it just frightened, young, expectant women you hate?

This is just one out of many examples that have ruined many a day for me.
www.tomdispatch.com...


All these dispatches from the "front" were, of course, military fairy tales. (There were no reporters in the vicinity.) It took over a year for a former GI named Ronald Ridenhour, who had heard about the bloody massacre from participants, and a young former AP reporter named Seymour Hersh working in Washington for a news service no one had ever heard of, to break the story, revealing that "red, white, and blue village" had just been red village -- the red of Vietnamese peasant blood. Over 400 elderly men, women, children, and babies had been slaughtered there by Charlie Company of Task Force Barker in a nearly day-long rampage.



posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 02:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Stormdancer777
 


I like that Gianna Jessen. She's got so much spunk.

[edit on 4/30/2010 by Jessicamsa]



posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 02:22 PM
link   
reply to post by rusethorcain
 



I have to ask you....do you also hate soldiers fighting for the freedom of our country or is it just frightened, young, expectant women you hate?


If soldiers are killing innocents...then they are not fighting for our freedom. Do I hate them...sure...but it is still a different type of hate then what I have for the above mentioned...if they advocate the killing of innocents because they think they are inconvenient or supporters of the enemy...then they are demented humans.


Save me the "frightened, young, expectant women". Give me a break...how frightened was she when she decided to lay down and spread her legs??? She made her decision when she thought she was a big grown up ready to have sex. How about this young women take some responsibility for her actions instead of killing a baby...OH right...a fetus...just like the fetus from the article. No...it's much easier for her just to kill it and forget about it...like it was a bad purchase she made at a store.

I have no sympathy for any women that views a baby as an inconvenience. And I truly feel sorry for any future kids she has. Disgusting.

[edit on 30-4-2010 by OutKast Searcher]



posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 03:14 PM
link   
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
 


Well, a little rough around the edges but I have to say I agree with most of what you wrote.

Some great info/debate going on. Much more than I expected. Keep up the fight. Star for you too!



posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 03:24 PM
link   
reply to post by anon72
 


THis is so revolting, sick and exactly what is happening in China and US. I'm disgusted at the hole of mankind. We don't help someone who is being attacked, or struck by a car, or aborted. Yet "they cry," By the gods, we must save the little doggies or whales." Bravo Sierra!


[edit on 30-4-2010 by Violater1]



posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 03:27 PM
link   
reply to post by marg6043
 


Well you can always put it this way. The child survived the abortion process. The child was outside the womb therefore is no longer considered a fetus. (yeah that's right) Therefore at that very moment doctors have a legal obligation to save the child. If they neglect that responsibility then the legal term for that is infanticide.

The crazy part is the mother could probably sue for "Wrongful Death" and win..

You can argue morality all you want, but the legality of the situation is a whole different conversation.



posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 03:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by AccessDenied
For me..Life begins at conception.
To terminate it is murder.
I don't push my choice or feelings on others, but it IS my choice, and my belief.


I think it is the 49th day after conception, as that is when '___' is first produced in the brain, linking the 'spirit' or 'life force' with the body. In fact the Japanese even have a celebration exactly 49 days after a death. Coincidence?!



posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 03:36 PM
link   
In my opinion maybe women that look for abortions outside of special cases should be forced to have surgery so they can never have a child again, at least that might make them think about the consequences.



posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 03:52 PM
link   
reply to post by PlayeR87
 


You speak about how barbaric abortion is yet you think it's morally okay to surgically rape women?




posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 04:07 PM
link   
reply to post by riley
 


It's not surgical rape. It's consensual if they must agree before the surgery takes place.

Sorry Invalid Argument.



posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 04:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by DaMod
reply to post by riley
 


It's not surgical rape. It's consensual if they must agree before the surgery takes place.

Sorry Invalid Argument.

I'm not certain if you were being ironic or not but in case you weren't;

If he was talking about women agreeing to such a surgery then he would not have used the word "force". He's talking about strapping a woman down and violating her reproductive organs with surgical instruments. Sounds like rape to me.

[edit on 30-4-2010 by riley]



posted on Apr, 30 2010 @ 04:39 PM
link   
reply to post by riley
 


Almost sounds like what happens to a baby, sorry I mean fetus.

Just saying.
Guess beggars cannot be choosers.

Raist



new topics

top topics



 
30
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join