It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pexx421
What i dont understand is that all these people complain about redistribution of wealth when people want to equalize the disparity down. However, none of them see anything wrong with redistributing up, such as the whole era of trickle down economics, such as tax breaks on corporations helping them to garner more profit, such as setting tax dollars now to DO the research on new drugs, while big pharma reaps the rewards, such as bailing out the banks who crash the economy, and then BoA and wells fargo dont pay a cent in taxes this year, but actually get a few mill BACK from the government.
All these corporations who are sending our jobs overseas, and putting their base of operations over seas so they dont have to pay taxes, yet WE're the ones who are whiny because we complain? Our GDP has doubled since 1970, and yet the average workers buying power has actually declined...not because we are not working as hard, but because the corporate sector maximizes profit by taking it from their workers, by minimizing pay raises, by lowering benefits, etc. THIS is how wealth has been redistributed by the owners, and since worker representation has been destroyed the average worker has little he can do about it. Now our economy is collapsing, there are record jobs lost each month, and record foreclosures quarter to quarter, and we are not supposed to complain as those corporations keep telling us things are fine because they keep posting record profit and bonuses??
The working class are losing jobs and homes on a massive scale, while big oil, big pharma, insurance, and banks are all posting sky high profit margins and you think no transfer of wealth is going on? If Obama really IS a socialist then he sure SUCKS at it!
pexx421
posted on 29-4-2010 @ 05:25
Sadly, it is a fact that massive accumulation of wealth in the hands of a few greatly destabilizes society, and is destructive to democracy ...
When George Soros placed a $10 billion speculative bet against the U.K. pound and won, he became universally known as "the man who broke the Bank of England." Whether you love him or hate him, Soros led the charge in one of the most fascinating events in currency trading history.
In the search for possible criminal charges against Goldman Sachs, investigators will have to dig up evidence they knowingly defrauded investors.
"There is a lot to go through. Very dense material. And it will take some time," an unnamed source told the Daily News.
It was timed to help boos financial reform bill.
Boo
boo is a term that is derived from the French word "beau" meaning beautiful. In 18th century England it meant an admirer, usually male. It made it's way into Afro-Caribean language perhaps through the French colonisation of some Caribean islands.
Originally posted by whatukno
I think that when you start making money off of people's failures, in such a way that you set up these same people to fail, you have made enough money.
Originally posted by pexx421
Sadly, it is a fact that massive accumulation of wealth in the hands of a few greatly destabilizes society, and is destructive to democracy. This is what you have here in the US, where now congress no longer represents the majority, rather they represent what the lobbyists pay them to, meaning that money buys rules. Sadly, those who aspire to acquire such wealth and who succeed, are often those with the least consideration for the welfare of the society, and these are not the ones who should be running things. They usually by design are those who are so materialistically inclined that they have developed little in the ways of compassion or wisdom.
Until our nation truly does seperate money from our electoral system, then perhaps it is its charge to protect us from destabilizing forces...thats what we pay taxes for, to stabilize our society, and as the great accumulation of wealth IS a destabilizing force, it should be addressed in some fashion, rather than ignored. The danger is just too great when oil companies can lobby for war to increase their profit margin, when pharmaceutical companies can lobby for no negotiation of prices to increase their profit, or for a medicine to be passed before proven safe. When agro companies can lobby extensive and burdensome registration of cattle, making it hard for small farms to compete, and so on.
Originally posted by Aggie Man
2. Put an end to inheritance (i.e., once you and your spouse are dead, then money goes back to the government)
I like option #2. Something just isn't right about people inheriting wealth that they made no contribution towards earning. If you didn't earn it, then you have no entitlement to it. (Funny, that sounds so familiar....oh yeah, that's what the tax protesters say about "entitlement" programs)
Originally posted by Matrix Rising
Wow!!!
Obama To Wall Street: "I Do Think At A Certain Point You've Made Enough Money"
This is truly dangerous talk in a free society.
Now Obama is going to tell people when they have made enough money?
This is how far left progressives think.
Now, what we're doing -- I want to be clear, we're not trying to push financial reform because we begrudge success that's fairly earned. I mean, I do think at a certain point you've made enough money. (Laughter.) But part of the American way is you can just keep on making it if you're providing a good product or you're providing a good service. We don't want people to stop fulfilling the core responsibilities of the financial system to help grow the economy.
I've said this before. I've said this on Wall Street just last week. I believe in the power of the free market. And I believe in a strong financial system. And when it's working right, financial institutions, they help make possible families buying homes, and businesses growing, and new ideas taking flight. An entrepreneur may have a great idea, but he may need to borrow some money to make it happen. It would be hard for a lot of us to buy a house -- our first house, at least, if we weren't able to take out a mortgage.
So there's nothing wrong with a financial system that helps the economy expand. And there are a lot of good people in the financial industry who are doing things the right way. And it's in our interest when those firms are strong and when they're healthy.
But some of these institutions that operated irresponsibly, they're not just threatening themselves -- they threaten the whole economy. And they threaten your dreams, your prospects, everything that you worked so hard to build.
So we just want them to operate in a way that's fair and honest and in the open, so that we don't have to go through what we've already gone through.
Originally posted by lpowell0627
This is the most outrageous thing I have seen in a long time!! So let me get this straight, your grandfather works 50 years building a business in this country. He passed the reigns to his son. His son works in the business for 50 years. He decides to sell the business and makes millions. He dies of a heart attack the next month and leaves behind 2 children and 4 grandchildren.
You're telling me the government should get this money???
What, exactly, did the government do to earn it???
Originally posted by Aggie Man
1. Set a cap on profits; or
It was timed to help boos financial reform bill.
It was timed to help boos(t) financial reform bill.