It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


98 ATS members and Counting...Australia "Out of Place"

page: 28
<< 25  26  27   >>

log in


posted on Apr, 29 2013 @ 07:19 AM
The thing is schools do not teach people the distances between many areas. They just ask to show countries on the map.

As far as I know, most kids remember Australia just as the "big island under (south of) Asia and right from (east of) Africa.

None of the above pictures is correct. C is probably the closest one. Papua New Guinea, is about 200km (about 120 miles) from the coast of Australia.

Answer to your question about change in timeline. I searched out some of my older school maps and in internet. Here is why it seems to lots of people that Australia "used to" be more distant:

1)When teaching continents, some (especially older) textbooks leave out most of the islands.
I had one map similar to this in my old workbook:

2) Also often smaller islands of Indonesia are left out, so it creates an illusion of them not being there at all. When there are no small islands on the map, it seems as there is much more distance between Indonesia and Australia. Textbooks often tend to leave out the islands of Sulawesi, Maluku, Lesser Sunda Islands ( Lombok, Bali, Flores, Komodo & Rinka) and also East Timor. You can imagine how the map looks like when only Java, Sumatra and Borneo (Kalimantan) are on the World Map from all the islands of Indonesia. There seems so much more distance between Indonesia and Australia/Papua New Guinea and that creates an illusion of them being more isolated from each other.

You can take a look at it from here and imagine how it would look like without these islands:

3) As you learn the easier maps at first, then often people do not pay much attention on the maps later on. The first time is always the one that has the strongest part in the memory. When repeating what you already believe to be knowing, you tend to miss the details.

4) Most people do not know world geography well, except the nearby area of their location
They might have an idea where something might be situated at, although they do not know the exact location.
edit on 29-4-2013 by Cabin because: Spelling mistakes

posted on Apr, 30 2013 @ 12:07 PM
Sorry to bump this monster, but count me in as one of the 98+.

While I am sure this has nothing to do with a "time-shift" or anything of the like, I have to admit that I, too, was taken aback when I realized the relative closeness of Australia to Papua New Guinea. It is not at all how I remembered it; what a strange phenomena. Even more strange is New Zealand is exactly where I remember it.

I'm really curious when and how my memory disconnect occurred.

For the record:
Early 40s
BS/MS from a major US university

posted on Apr, 30 2013 @ 12:10 PM
reply to post by Snowi

What is more likely the logical explaination: alternate realities or some people with inadequate geographical knowlege or memory of the same?

posted on Apr, 30 2013 @ 07:54 PM
This is a rather odd thread. So, someone posts something extremely vague like "things seem out of whack today", and then someone pipes up "yeah, I was looking at a map, and New Zealand's not where I remember it". Most people not knowing exactly where NZ is in relation to Australia, others chime in "yeah, you know what, I think you're right". Pretty soon we get the mass hysteria effect making incoherent causal relationships... "things are suddenly out of whack, and the fact that NZ isn't where it should be is proof!". Umm, yeah... The internet can be a scary place sometimes...

new topics

top topics
<< 25  26  27   >>

log in