It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mellisamouse
reply to post by Waiting2
I KNOW Austrailia had the reputation as being SOOOOO far away and isolated, so they sent all the prisoners there.
Does it still have that repution?
Has this changed as well???
Originally posted by Mumbotron
reply to post by Mayson
That isn't a theory. It's a hypothesis and a very weak one at best. Holding an incorrect belief for an extended period of time doesn't make it any more true or real. Imagine all of those people who thought the world was flat for their whole lives. Do you think they were from another dimension too?, .... or just ignorant?
Originally posted by MaxBlack
reply to post by Snowi
I responded originally to this posting way long ago. I have since found something that could be considered to help explain what may be going on.
Recently there has been a lot of concern and talk of which plenty of background can be found on You-tube if you're in need of true background and more information. Anyway, recently there has been talk of a theory called "Expanding Earth Theory" and while it is more a long term geological concern, I noted that at present in the Pacific, scientist have lately been monitoring the sea floor and have noted a 13 foot per day rise in the ocean floor.
Under such a long term expansion and rise of the ocean floor, would cause disasters world wide. Anyway the reason I feel that this new theory may have something to do with it, what you and others may be seeing which the government is keeping secret is the fact that the planet is expanding in that region of the Pacific and Australia in such a way that only New Guinea is affected.
I realize this a stretch, but in the overall schema of things, to exclude this possibility is to ignore the possibility that could be perhaps verified by regional and local scientist that specifically test or look for this theory to be valid. If so, it would mean that the islands are moving around each other and while that for the moment is not catastrophic, if the ocean floor collapses or begins to rise to quickly, all that water will cause problems.
Any, I just wanted to throw that possibility in the ring of possibilities.
I follow time shifts anomalies, time travel and so forth and but if we aren't experiencing time shifts then a good fall back could be the expanding earth theory. Just food for thought.
Thanks again.
Originally posted by demonseed
Originally posted by MaxBlack
reply to post by Snowi
The problem is that even maps from before show australia in the "position its always been."
It doesnt matter how far back you look, australia looks like it does now. The old australia that we remember does not exist on a map anywhere.
exactly. NOTHING will have changed in this timeline to people who have allways BEEN in this timeline.
It has only changed for those of us whom have recently joined you.
Originally posted by mellisamouse
reply to post by destination now
But you just keep coming back like a moth to a flame......
why is that?
I grew up hearing the penal colony story, myself. Honestly we did not cover Australia's history or development in depth. We skimmed over it and I do definitely remember the teacher talking about Australia's history as a penal colony. I'm not saying I wasn't grossly misinformed by a shockingly ignorant teacher. I'm just putting it out there that this is what I was told in school. It's possible that others have been fed the same misinformation in their schools. Just be aware this misconception about Australia's history is definitely out there.
Originally posted by destination now
reply to post by 2theC
Brilliant!
And as for the response to waiting2, if you had read the Wikipedia source you would see that Australia was not chosen as a penal colony due to it's isolation and in fact was never chosen to be a penal colony at all, there were many settlers from the British Empire who chose to emigrate to a new life in a new land, much in the same way we colonised America. But like I said the convicts came in handy to build the road/rail infrastructure, so not sure why you just totally agreed with the previous poster's rather ignorant assumption that Australia was the place they sent all the convicts to because it was soooooo(sic) isolated (and said poster has still not answered my previous questions, but meh I give up)
Originally posted by destination now
I'm interested in getting an answer to my questions but looks like you're not going to give me one, it was a couple of simple questions...
Originally posted by destination now
reply to post by mellisamouse
Well no-one in my "timeline" thinks this, so could we have some more facts as you see it please, like for example the date you heard the news, the tv channel, internet site you heard the information on, the newspaper you read etc the actual number of your friends or associates that believe this (it would be great if you could convince them to come onto ATS and corroborate this)
Nelson Mandela has always been alive in my timeline and I remember events like his 70th birthday event in 1988 where Artists Against Apartheid got to together for a tribute and where the legendary "Free Nelson Mandela" was performed, of course Amy Winehouse managed to trump that in 2008 at Nelson's 90th by changing the lyrics to "Free Blakey my fella" in reference to her then jailed husband!
I also remember him being freed in 1990 and although he was diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2001 he is still very much alive. One of his sons died though in 2005 but he wasn't killed he died of an aids/hiv related illness.
So as I have provided evidence of his continued life, I would appreciate it if you could give me some solid evidence of why you think he died.
Thanks