It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Ok...I have a few questions for you, I asked these in another thread but didn't get answers from anyone.
Do you think American citizens who are hispanic in Arizona have a right to feel upset and maybe even scared? They know they now have to carry ID that NO OTHER American citizen has to carry. They have to now PROVE they are a CITIZEN...have you ever had to do that...with threat of detainment or deportation if you couldn't?
Do you think white American citizens in Arizona have any of the above concerns???
Can you honestly now say that white and hispanic AMERICAN CITIZENS (read: I'm not talking about illegal immigrants) are going to be treated as equals now in Arizona???
[edit on 27-4-2010 by OutKast Searcher]
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by projectvxn
Actually the point I\'m trying to make is that if a peace officer asks you for ID you hve to show it. If you\'re a citizen you have ID, if you\'re illegal you don\'t. It seems pretty cut and dry to me.
No...it isn\'t cut and dry because that isn\'t a law.
What ID do I have to show that I am an American Citizen??? Let\'s say I\'m out on a walk...I\'m not driving so I don\'t legally need my drivers licenese. I am not legally required to have a state ID (even if I was in Nevada I wouldn\'t be required under the law to have an ID). I\'m not going to carry my SS card or my birth certificate around with me everywhere I go. So what do I show the police officer when he asks me for my papers???
Should I be detained for going on a walk? Should any American citizen?
My argument is simple...American citizens have never had to carry proof of citizenship...this law will now require a subset of American citizens in Arizona (hispanics) to now carry proof of citizenship or they may be detained and worst case scenario accidentally deported...all because they share the skin color of illegal immigrants.
I am NOT talking about the illegal immigrants...if a million illegal immigrants get stopped, asked for ID, can\'t provide it, get deported...all legal. But if ONE American citizen gets detained because of his skin color alone...then it is unconstitutional...plain and simple...cut and dry.
We don\'t live in a country who\'s claim is \"everyone is free and their rights are protected...unless you share your skin color with a group of people that have broken the law...then your rights will be sacraficed so we can pursue those that have broken the law\".
That is not what I want my country to become...and that is the direction this law is leading us.
Originally posted by TaxpayersUnleashed
Arizona HB 1070.How could you not support it?
Originally posted by OrganizedChaos
This law will cost Americans untold millions of taxpayer dollars in litigation alone.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by grey580
All illegals live under the threat of deportation.
I'm not talking about illegals...I'm talking about American citizens.
If you are here legally and you have all the proper id and documentation.
You don't have anything to worry about.
Well that's the thing now isn't it. As American citizens we are not required to carry any identification or documentation. No state, that I know of, requires you to have a state ID...and you don't need a DL unless you want to drive. No one is legally required to keep a copy of their birth certificate in their possession.
I have given many scenarios in past threads...they are usually just ignored. I will just give you one here.
1) A hispanic from California that was born in the United States takes a vacation to Arizona to visit other hispanic (American Citizen) friends. This man doesn't drive so has no DL and never got a state ID because it isn't required. He was born in a hospital in New York city...but doesn't have a current copy of his birth certificate. While in Arizona he is in a car that is stopped for speeding...the police officer decides that a car full of hispanics is reasonable enough suspicion to ask them for all their "papers". They all give their Arizona state ids or DL...but this man has no identification. When asked his address he gives an address in California...police man becomes more suspicious...decides to detain him until this man can prove he is here legally...only problem is for him to do that he would have to go to New York to get a copy of his BC. So he is detained for days? weeks? months? Until immigration can work it out.
Tell me...what crime did this American Citizen commit???
Originally posted by hiwhatsup
Those that are fighting for this bill to be abolished are only fighting for your rights and lives to be taken away. And now is really turning to the time to pick a side and stop being on the fence, you are either for america and its freedom or you are against it.
[edit on 28-4-2010 by hiwhatsup]
Originally posted by Wolfenz
for one If he was born in the states then that means he was raised in American Culture!!!!!! Lifestyle ! he would not have a Heavy Accent !
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by Wolfenz
for one If he was born in the states then that means he was raised in American Culture!!!!!! Lifestyle ! he would not have a Heavy Accent !
That's not true. MANY people are born here and speak mostly Spanish, but learn English from their parents who speak Spanish. Therefor they learn it with an accent. I live in New Mexico. I know plenty of people born here who speak English with a Spanish accent.
Originally posted by nunya13
reply to post by prionace glauca
Just because a majority of the population agrees with the bill does not mean others who are against it are required to conform to the same line of thinking. I'm still trying to understand this whole "your either for this bill or against America" mentality. Can you please help me understand?
Originally posted by prionace glauca
Originally posted by nunya13
reply to post by prionace glauca
Just because a majority of the population agrees with the bill does not mean others who are against it are required to conform to the same line of thinking. I'm still trying to understand this whole "your either for this bill or against America" mentality. Can you please help me understand?
So you are telling me that since a minority of the population most of whom are illegal do not agree to the majority of the populace everything should be overturned?
[edit on 29-4-2010 by prionace glauca]