I think you like to argue with me!
Not really, I just like to clarify erroneous information as I don't like seeing people being misinformed or misled.
A few name changes here and there and you have a similar story.
It's more than just name changes. It's place, extent, survivor numbers, methodology of how the floods were initiated, deities involved, time periods involved, etc. Your doing nothing more than attempting to make various mythologies fit the Judaic-Christian religion which is really a conglomeration of all these older mythologies.
Hey, I'm not saying that anyone is right or wrong, my friend.
Here's something you said to another poster:
"They found a big boat. That big boat is called an ARK. "
Sounds as if your favoring one version of the story that also happens to be the most recent version of an older story told by the ancient Sumerians.
I am clearly stating the OP is about Noah's Ark and the story is based on Ararat.
Regardless of what the website linked to says, doesn't make it what it's claimed to be. This is what, the fiftieth 'Ark' that's been found? How many more Arks will be found after this hoax?
This is all based on belief. Yours or mine.
Just like the pyramids from all over the world are similar. NOT EXACT. Hmm...
So are these stories.
That's akin to saying because everyone first built dirt huts, there must have been a world wide civilization. Then people upgraded to stone round houses or pit houses, must be attributed to a world wide civilization. a FEW civilizations built temples out of a SIMPLE shape, must have been a world wide civilization. Some have flood mythologies, must have been a world wide flood that wiped out this world wide civilization.
Talk about backwards thinking!




