It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dragnet53
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Anjaba
Well, if they aren't stars then it isn't a "fake star field", is it?
You'll have a hard time finding any images of the space station with any stars in it. Exposure issues.
exposure issues?! LOL I am well an expert with photoshop and can tell you can even erase the exposure "issues".
Originally posted by tigpoppa
ummmm not to be too techy.
but has anyone bothered to check the exif header data for the linked image?
Someone should post that to their forums and look into this. It may reveal the information you are looking for.
For those that dont know what an exif header is, use your google!!! I love learning and exif is something we should all know about. Since it can be used to track an image to its originating source.
There are two problems with the header. One is that the information is hidden unless you have some utility to see the info. The second problem is that in most all imaging applications, once the image is re-saved in another application (outside the camera), all the information is lost.
Originally posted by Anjaba
reply to post by JPhish
I agree completely! It's extremely obvious that it was duplicated and pasted there.. I can never jump on with the "faces" in the rock crowd because to me that is stretching it a bit, but this is right there plain as day.
Originally posted by TrappedSoul
Thank you for your observant eye and for notifying us.
You are right that some effort was made to make the image more appealing. Whereas NASA imagery professionals would not manipulate a star field or crop out hardware, they would possibly attempt to correct the ghosting around the target and perhaps some inadvertent cloning of some dead pixels occurred. This image was poorly exposed when it was shot so a great deal of density and contrast correction had to be performed. The raw image did not contain the dead pixels and they are not star fields as described.
NASA quit flying “secret” equipment in the late eighties when it quit conducting missions in space on behalf of the Department of Defense.
Thanks again and please write us again when you have such questions.
Mike Gentry
Media Resource Center
Johnson Space Center
Houston, TX 77058
Originally posted by KILL_DOGG
I am truly not trying to be an ass here, but I have to ask, "Who cares?" I mean, why is it such a big deal that there are items in space that they don't want the masses to see?
Originally posted by franspeakfree
Dang, whats that all you NASA lovers? NASA do not intentionally tamper with their images. This letter begs to differ.
Originally posted by Anjaba
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
The only thing I'll trust them to do is keep making little mistakes like this to keep confirming my beliefs.
Originally posted by Seitler
It's been a LONG while since I've posted, but this made me think... and therefore FORCE you to think with me
Maybe there is an ATS member in NASA working the photoshop job, but keeping their identity super secret, so they can put out obvious fakes like this one. IF they are an ATS member in secret, then the would know how completely anal we get over picking apart pictures.
This, if that is the case, is this theorhetical person shouting "HEY, LOOK HERE! I'M GIVING YOU OBVIOUS EVIDENCE SINCE I CAN'T JUST TELL YOU THE TRUTH!"
What the truth is, that is what we must speculate on. Maybe our annonymous "Photoshop Phriend" will let a few more obvious 'lazy pieces' loose so we can figure out what is going on.
Thank you Photoshop Phriend!
AND thank you OP, for giving me a nice nudge to the brain!
Originally posted by Seitler
It's been a LONG while since I've posted, but this made me think... and therefore FORCE you to think with me
Maybe there is an ATS member in NASA working the photoshop job, but keeping their identity super secret, so they can put out obvious fakes like this one. IF they are an ATS member in secret, then the would know how completely anal we get over picking apart pictures.
This, if that is the case, is this theorhetical person shouting "HEY, LOOK HERE! I'M GIVING YOU OBVIOUS EVIDENCE SINCE I CAN'T JUST TELL YOU THE TRUTH!"
What the truth is, that is what we must speculate on. Maybe our annonymous "Photoshop Phriend" will let a few more obvious 'lazy pieces' loose so we can figure out what is going on.
Thank you Photoshop Phriend!
AND thank you OP, for giving me a nice nudge to the brain!
Originally posted by JJRichey
Hold on hold on hold on....If NASA was tampering with photos that have something to hide....why POST THE PHOTOS AT ALL! Why wouldn't they just press that little delete button and make it go away? I mean really? Why?
If I killed somebody and took a photo of their house and accidentally got the dead guy in the background, would I keep the photo? Noooooo.....
Doesn't make any sense to me.
Edited because I'm not an English teacher...
[edit on 6-5-2010 by JJRichey]
Originally posted by demonseed
1)...
2)...
3)...
Originally posted by CHRLZ
Originally posted by demonseed
1)...
2)...
3)...
and of course...
4) If you don't know much about imaging/photography and conditions in space, combined with an intense desire to believe something is 'up'.. you will tend to see lots more 'anomalies' than those in the other camp..
Originally posted by demonseed
Originally posted by CHRLZ
Originally posted by demonseed
1)...
2)...
3)...
and of course...
4) If you don't know much about imaging/photography and conditions in space, combined with an intense desire to believe something is 'up'.. you will tend to see lots more 'anomalies' than those in the other camp..
You havent seen some of the Mars stuff, have you?
Here, let me direct you:
www.youtube.com...
start watching at 0:44 seconds. If that doesn't strike you as "odd" then i really dont know what to say....