It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New News Five Demolition Teams Cleaned Up WTC Site!

page: 1
5
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 04:39 PM
link   
Going through various articles I found on Implosion World how the five building demolition companies are credited with the clean-up of WTC Complex!

Implosion world Article

Wow!

I know that Controlled demolition was involved, but now five COMPAINES have claimed to clean up the site. Each was responsible for a 1/6th area of the complex.

Here is a List of said compaines!

Controlled Demolition Inc

D.H. Griffin Companies

Mazzocchi Wrecking

Gateway Demolition

Yannuzzi Demolition & Disposal

Where was the FBI doing there investigation??

What about the NSTB doing there investigation?

How about NSIT doing there investigation?

The companies above disposed of evidence related to the whorst tragedy on American soil!

One thing we know for sure is they cleaned it up fast so no one could do A REAL INVESTIGATION!




posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 04:43 PM
link   
What type of company would have been best suited to handling the debris from a collapsed building? Keep trying though.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 04:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by theability
Going through various articles I found on Implosion World how the five building demolition companies are credited with the clean-up of WTC Complex!

Implosion world Article

Wow!

I know that Controlled demolition was involved, but now five COMPAINES have claimed to clean up the site. Each was responsible for a 1/6th area of the complex.

Here is a List of said compaines!

Controlled Demolition Inc

D.H. Griffin Companies

Mazzocchi Wrecking

Gateway Demolition

Yannuzzi Demolition & Disposal

Where was the FBI doing there investigation??

What about the NSTB doing there investigation?

How about NSIT doing there investigation?

The companies above disposed of evidence related to the whorst tragedy on American soil!

One thing we know for sure is they cleaned it up fast so no one could do A REAL INVESTIGATION!



Investigate what? What is it that the NTSB was going to investigate in the rubble of the WTC? The FBI was all over the place and the NIST does not normally do on site investigations.

Now what should they have been looking for and more importantly - why?



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 04:54 PM
link   
Turner Construction Company participated in the collection and disposal of the steel wreckage of the WTC towers as well.

They also occupied the 38th floor of WTC 1.

Turner Construction Company has also done demolitions. They helped plan and oversee the demolition of the Seattle Kingdome in 2000:

seattlepi.nwsource.com...
www.stadium.org...

Kevin Ryan, formerly of UL, made a post back in January of 2008 at 9/11 Blogger showing that the floors of the WTC that had the fire-proofing upgraded, matched almost exactly to the floors that were impacted and failed in both towers:



www.911blogger.com...

It turns out the company that did those upgrades was Turner Construction company.



The CEO of Turner Construction Company from 1999-2006 was Tom Leppert. He then became mayor of Dallas, Texas:

www.turnerconstruction.com...
www.nndb.com...
www.dallascityhall.com...

President George W. Bush appointed Dallas Mayor Tom Leppert to the President’s Commission on White House Fellows:

www.tomleppert.com...

Now that George W. Bush has moved out of the White House, he lives in Dallas, Texas about a mile away from Tom Leppert.





[edit on 26-4-2010 by _BoneZ_]



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 05:15 PM
link   
reply to post by hooper
 


Hooper can you understand what crime scene means?

That civilians don't enter! You don't remover debris, you don't ship off the evidence to other countries!


Here is a snippet from this article:

A crime scene is a location where an illegal act took place, and comprises the area from which most of the physical evidence is retrieved by trained law enforcement personnel, crime scene investigators (CSIs) or in rare circumstances, forensic scientists.


So no removal of the remaining WTC complex should have happened. they should have combed through the debris and compiled evidence for acertaining facts of what actually happened.

Ohh thats right, before anything was evaluated they already knew everything they needed to know!

Here I have one definition:

Preposterous: Contrary to nature, reason, or common sense; absurd. See Synonyms at Foolish!



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 05:25 PM
link   
In all fairness, the buildings were demolished. Regardless of how they were demolished, those best suited to clean up a demolition would be demolition companies.

OP, what makes you believe that the FBI, NSTB and NSIT didn't investigate?



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 05:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Aggie Man
 



OP, what makes you believe that the FBI, NSTB and NSIT didn't investigate?


The formulation of answers to why the buildings fell was out in MSM before a investigation could have been completed. Actually immediatley. Like the BBC reported that said WTC fell before it had!

It took 441 days for the 9/11 Commission to be invoked, way longer than the clean-up crews took.

The MSM story was out before any investigation took place. Then employed to clean the site are demolition crews disturning the crime scenes.

If you have an answer before, that would be preminition or preplanning.

To have an answer after you investigate, would be more believable right?

Remember that same day they knew the whole story immediately, way to fast for the best investigators in the world.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 06:26 PM
link   
That probably covers just about all the major demolition companies.

What's a good way to keep a demo company from coming out to say that the buildings were controlled demolitions in their opinions (like Danny Jawenko)? Give them all a piece of the pie, government contracts are a God send for any company. With enough financial incentive even the Pope would do what he was told and not ask any questions.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 07:30 PM
link   
reply to post by ANOK
 




What's a good way to keep a demo company from coming out to say that the buildings were controlled demolitions in their opinions (like Danny Jawenko)? Give them all a piece of the pie, government contracts are a God send for any company. With enough financial incentive even the Pope would do what he was told and not ask any questions.


That about says it!



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 10:40 PM
link   
The Tully Construction Company was the main company in charge of the cleanup.

I e-mailed them asking some questions but their reply back was that they could not answer my questions due to 9/11 lawsuits.



posted on Apr, 27 2010 @ 12:19 AM
link   
reply to post by hooper
 


Investigate what?


Demolition! Two of the worlds tallest buildings exploded live on television and fell the same way we see demolition companies demo buildings like the Casinos in Los Vegas.
These buildings were designed to stand, even if they were hit multiple times by fully loaded commercial airliners. The designers of the WTC stated they over built the WTC



The World Trade Center Building Designers: Pre-9/11 claims strongly implicate that the Towers should have remained standing on 9/11

Like many modern structures and buildings, the WTC Towers were over-designed to withstand weight distribution in the event of structural damage. According to calculations made by the engineers who helped with the design of the Twin Towers, “[color=gold]all the columns on one side of a Tower could be cut, as well as the two corners and some of the columns on each adjacent side, and the building would still be strong enough to withstand a 100-mile-per-hour wind.”[5] As well, “Live loads on these columns can be increased more than 2,000% before failure occurs.”[6]

“The Office of Special Planning (OSP), a unit set up by the New York Port Authority to assess the security of its facilities against terrorist attacks, spends four to six months studying the World Trade Center. It examines the center’s design through looking at photographs, blueprints, and plans. It brings in experts such as the builders of the center, plus experts in sabotage and explosives, and has them walk through the WTC to identify any areas of vulnerability…”O’Sullivan consults ‘one of the trade center’s original structural engineers, Les Robertson, on[color=gold] whether the towers would collapse because of a bomb or a collision with a slow-moving airplane. He is told there is ‘little likelihood of a collapse no matter how the building was attacked.’”[7]


arabesque911.blogspot.com...



What is it that the NTSB was going to investigate in the rubble of the WTC?


The fact that most of the concrete in all the WTC was pulverized into a find powder was certainly not normal from a natural building collapse; this should have been enough to warrant a criminal investigation to begin with. Building Engineers from around the world were already suspicious of demolition since day one. Many made statement that what they witness on television was not natural. Furthermore, hundreds of credible eyewitness saw and heard explosions.


[color=gold]The Sept. 11 Records
A rich vein of city records from Sept. 11, including more than 12,000 pages of oral histories rendered in the voices of 503 firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians, were made public on Aug. 12. The New York Times has published all of them.
The oral histories of dispatch transmissions are transcribed verbatim. They have have not been edited to omit coarse language.


graphics8.nytimes.com...


Explosive Testimony: Revelations about the Twin Towers in the 9/11 Oral Histories

"[T]here was just an explosion [in the south tower]. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions."--Firefighter Richard Banaciski
"I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?"
--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory
"[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."
--Paramedic Daniel River
[color=gold]Multiple Explosions

In June of 2002, NBC television played segments from tapes recorded on 9/11. One segment contained the following exchange, which involved firefighters in the south tower:

Official: Battalion 3 to dispatch, we've just had another explosion.
Official: Battalion 3 to dispatch, we've had additional explosion.
Dispatcher: Received battalion command. Additional explosion.

Firefighter Louie Cacchioli, after entering the north tower lobby and seeing elevator doors completely blown out and people being hit with debris, asked himself, "how could this be happening so quickly if a plane hit way above"? After he reached the 24th floor, he and another fireman "heard this huge explosion that sounded like a bomb [and] knocked off the lights and stalled the elevator." After they pried themselves out of the elevator, "another huge explosion like the first one hits. This one hits about two minutes later . . . [and] I'm thinking, "Oh. My God, these bastards put bombs in here like they did in 1993!"12
Multiple explosions were also reported by Teresa Veliz, who worked for a software development company in the north tower. She was on the 47th floor, she reported, when suddenly "the whole building shook. . . . [Shortly thereafter] the building shook again, this time even more violently." Then, while Veliz was making her way downstairs and outside: "There were explosions going off everywhere. I was convinced that there were bombs planted all over the place and someone was sitting at a control panel pushing detonator buttons. . . . There was another explosion. And another. I didn't know where to run."13

Steve Evans, a New York-based correspondent for the BBC, said: "I was at the base of the second tower . . . that was hit. . . . There was an explosion. . . . The base of the building shook. . . . [T]hen there was a series of explosions."14
Sue Keane, an officer in the New Jersey Fire Police Department who was previously a sergeant in the U.S. Army, said in her account of the onset of the collapse of the south tower: "[I]t sounded like bombs going off. That's when the explosions happened. . . . I knew something was going to happen. . . . It started to get dark, then all of a sudden there was this massive explosion." Then, discussing her experiences during the collapse of the north tower, she said: "[There was] another explosion. That sent me and the two firefighters down the stairs. . . . I can't tell you how many times I got banged around. Each one of those explosions picked me up and threw me. . . . There was another explosion, and I got thrown with two firefighters out onto the street.
Wall Street Journal reporter John Bussey, describing his observation of the collapse of the south tower from the ninth floor of the WSJ office building, said: "I . . . looked up out of the office window to see what seemed like perfectly synchronized explosions coming from each floor. . . . One after the other, from top to bottom, with a fraction of a second between, the floors blew to pieces."16
Another Wall Street Journal reporter said that after seeing what appeared to be "individual floors, one after the other exploding outward," he thought: "'My God, they're going to bring the building down.' And they, whoever they are, HAD SET CHARGES. . . . I saw the explosions."
[color=gold]Testimonies in the Oral Histories Suggestive of Controlled Demolition

Shaking Ground before the Collapse

As we saw earlier, some people in the towers reported that there were powerful explosions in the basements. Such explosions would likely have caused the ground to shake.
Such shaking was reported by medical technician Lonnie Penn, who said that just before the collapse of the south tower: "I felt the ground shake, I turned around and ran for my life. I made it as far as the Financial Center when the collapse happened."24


www.911truth.org...




[edit on 27-4-2010 by impressme]



posted on Apr, 27 2010 @ 12:21 AM
link   
reply to post by hooper
 


[color=gold]Eyewitness Reports Of Explosions
Before WTC Collapses


"As more and more and more and more and more emergency vehicles descended on the World Trade Center, I hear a second explosion in WTC 2, then a loud, low-frequency rumble that precipitates the unthinkable -- a collapse of all the floors above the point of explosion. First the top surface, containing the helipad, tips sideways in full view. Then the upper floors fall straight down in a demolition-style implosion, taking all lower floors with it, even those below the point of the explosion."


whatreallyhappened.com...


The FBI was all over the place and the NIST does not normally do on site investigations.


The FBI was all over the place putting gag orders on the NYC firemen, NYC police officers, and first responders. As far as FBI and NIST they did not investigated anything and they have yet to tell anyone the truth to this very day to what really happened at the WTC. I believe that most people will agree with me on this statement alone.


Now what should they have been looking for and more importantly - why?

Any remains of demolition or at least let scientist examine the WTC rubble or steel.
The city of New York ( Mayor, Rudolph W. Giuliani) disturbed a federal crime scene to begin with. Mayor Giuliani order a rush to clean up the crime scene, at ground zero and the FBI broke federal laws in helping the government in covering up the real evidences. Our government would not allow anyone near the crime scene like Engineers or scientist to examine any of the WTC debris in fact the demolition companies had GPS tracking devices put on all the dump trucks, so that there were no unusual stops to the land field.


[color=gold]Highly Sensitive Garbage

Given that the people in charge considered the steel garbage, useless to any investigation in this age of computer simulations, they certainly took pains to make sure it didn't end up anywhere other than a smelting furnace. [color=gold]They installed GPS locater devices on each of the trucks that was carrying loads away from Ground Zero, at a cost of $1000 each. The securitysolutions.com website has an article on the tracking system with this passage.


911research.wtc7.net...

If it looks like a demolition, sounds like demolition, smells like demolition, behaves as a demolition, then it IS demolition.
If it looks like an explosion, sounds like an explosion, behaves as an explosion, then it IS an explosion.



posted on Apr, 27 2010 @ 03:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by impressme
[
Demolition! Two of the worlds tallest buildings exploded live on television and fell the same way we see demolition companies demo buildings like the Casinos in Los Vegas.


Perhaps you could explain why demolition companies, when blowing up hotels in Las Vegas, aim to scatter debris over a wide field? You regularly post a diagram showing how far the pieces of the tower were thrown.

I mean, I know Vegas is quite big, but surely this is a foolhardy way to demolish a hotel.



posted on Apr, 27 2010 @ 03:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by ANOK
That probably covers just about all the major demolition companies.

What's a good way to keep a demo company from coming out to say that the buildings were controlled demolitions in their opinions (like Danny Jawenko)? Give them all a piece of the pie, government contracts are a God send for any company. With enough financial incentive even the Pope would do what he was told and not ask any questions.


I always find it interesting that many TM people are so cynical of others' motives. It's a common suggestion that one way to silence the hundreds - if not thousands - of people who know about the "inside job" is to give them a financial incentive.

So my question is this. If you had participated, perhaps unknowingly, in the events of 9/11, how much cash would it take you to keep quiet about it? Given that nobody is apparently immune to the lure of money there must be a figure which would be enough to buy your silence.



posted on Apr, 27 2010 @ 06:24 AM
link   
reply to post by theability
 


Yeah, ground zero was just a typical crime scene, they should have dusted for prints. The FBI would still be there.

So what were they supposed to be "investigating"? Looking for super nano-thermite? Nukes? What?

Litterally, millions of people witnessed the crime. What would the "investigation" yield?



posted on Apr, 27 2010 @ 06:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Perhaps you could explain why demolition companies, when blowing up hotels in Las Vegas, aim to scatter debris over a wide field? You regularly post a diagram showing how far the pieces of the tower were thrown.


Maybe it has something to do with that fact that 9/11 was not a normal situation but an emergency situation?



[edit on 27-4-2010 by REMISNE]



posted on Apr, 27 2010 @ 06:37 AM
link   
reply to post by impressme
 



The fact that most of the concrete in all the WTC was pulverized into a find powder....


No it didn't. If that were true all they would have needed for the cleanup was brooms and hoses.


....this should have been enough to warrant a criminal investigation to begin with.


If it had happened, but it didn't.


Building Engineers from around the world were already suspicious of demolition since day one.


No they didn't. Your hyperbole is not a basis for an investigation, sorry.


Many made statement that what they witness on television was not natural. Furthermore, hundreds of credible eyewitness saw and heard explosions.


You mean a commercial jetliner striking a skyscraper isn't "natrual"? I'll be darned. And no there were not hundreds of credible witness who heard anything like building demolition blasts. Again, your hyperbole is not the basis for an investigation.



posted on Apr, 27 2010 @ 06:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by ANOK
That probably covers just about all the major demolition companies.

What's a good way to keep a demo company from coming out to say that the buildings were controlled demolitions in their opinions (like Danny Jawenko)? Give them all a piece of the pie, government contracts are a God send for any company. With enough financial incentive even the Pope would do what he was told and not ask any questions.


Who exactly do you think runs these companies and works for them? Do you think everyone who works for a demo company is some souless demon that will ignore evidence of murder just to get a paycheck?

If you thought your neighbor was abusing his/her child would you look the other way if they slipped you a couple of bucks? Hopefully not, but you feel perfectly comfortable making the same kind of ungrounded, baseless accusations against persons you don't know and never met.

Sorry, you don't get to demonize everyone who doesn't contribute to your fantasy.



posted on Apr, 27 2010 @ 06:49 AM
link   
reply to post by theability
 



they should have combed through the debris and compiled evidence for acertaining facts of what actually happened.


Or they could just watch the tapes of the planes crashing into the buildings. That would probably give them a clue or two.




posted on Apr, 27 2010 @ 07:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by hooper
Or they could just watch the tapes of the planes crashing into the buildings. That would probably give them a clue or two.


But watching tapes is not a criminal investiagation.




top topics



 
5
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join