LETTER FROM NASA SCIENTIST Creates More Questions? Rogue Planet Alert!

page: 4
65
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join

posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 03:49 PM
link   
Here you go:

VENUS


MERCURY


?????




The fact is, the lightwave signature off of the anomaly is much higher than both Mercury and Venus according to these images.

[edit on 25-4-2010 by discl0sur3]




posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 03:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Pr0t0
 


Yes, Home Planet it was.

I love that program. (I use the program not the site). The other facilities including the animations are superb.

reply to post by discl0sur3
 


How can you compare? One is Ahead and the other is Behind - two different cameras. You don't know the refraction properties of the respective lenses.

[edit on 25/4/2010 by PuterMan]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Rohdan
 


To keep people calm. A fair tactic.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:08 PM
link   
This seems very odd....
I agree there's definitely some questions that need be answered here.

I can't understand why or how the NASA scientist would give false info...
I mean, maybe contact dude again with what you have disclosure.

From the last three images you've shown (disclosure) I believe too that this is going to get interesting.

After reading soo much on past civilizations regarding this phenomenon, I really don't see Nibiru that far fetched... just my opinion though.

Good work ALL, keep it goin!



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:32 PM
link   
Not being a huge scientific mind I just had this question.

Could this have anything to do with the rocket that just went up with the unmanned ship whose use is top secret? When was the last time a rocket was put up by the Air Force and a mystery surrounded the purpose of the unmanned craft it was sending out.

Interesting to think about.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:35 PM
link   
reply to post by discl0sur3
 


I understand that these are different dates, because they wouldn't be showing up together at this same time, (correct?). And that these are all images from COR2 (correct?).
If that is the case, the third image is of a different object because of it's elevation or position (correct?).
Then what the he!! is it?




posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:37 PM
link   
also weird to see how many people are here trying to debunk this, if it's not real then it doesn't matter.....right?



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:38 PM
link   
I don't get where you came up with the 2 weeks left thing. Am I missing something in the OP??



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:39 PM
link   
reply to post by redhead57
 


Hmmm ... X-37b 'unknown' mission status and return, unconfirmed/conflicting planet positions, add in some missing nukes for good measure and we have ourselves a conspiracy!!



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:42 PM
link   
reply to post by Violater1
 


"And that these are all images from COR2 (correct?). "

Incorrect. The top of the photos are clearly labeled.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Violater1
reply to post by discl0sur3
 


I understand that these are different dates, because they wouldn't be showing up together at this same time, (correct?). And that these are all images from COR2 (correct?).
If that is the case, the third image is of a different object because of it's elevation or position (correct?).
Then what the he!! is it?


Zaphod is correct, Violator1...I had a hard time finding an image from the COR2. I've managed to track down an image (albeit small) of both planets in the same frame. Venus is on the left.




[edit on 25-4-2010 by discl0sur3]

[edit on 25-4-2010 by discl0sur3]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:47 PM
link   
So I guess Planet X could be coming then, well the dates said it was supposed to be seen until 2010. 2011 2012.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:48 PM
link   
As astronomy is only a hobby for me I am afraid I cannot add any scientific thought to the thread. I do know that regardless of the response you received from NASA it was almost certainly a lie. Anyone who has done a little research knows that NASA never tells the whole story let alone a truthful story.
That being said, I am a very open minded person. I think it is foolish to say that we human beings know 100% about everything in our little solar system. Scientists and Astronomers today still get curve balls thrown at them. We humans know nothing compared to the vast knowledge that our universe holds. We are naive.

[edit on 25-4-2010 by dplum517]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by discl0sur3

Originally posted by Phage



Have you seen the size of this thing? It's bigger than Jupiter. Mercury is a mere dot in comparison!

[edit on 25-4-2010 by discl0sur3]

[edit on 25-4-2010 by discl0sur3]


I hope your joking lmao, in that picture, imagine looking at the sun from earth, it would nearly fill the entire sky view, clearly not to any accurate scale.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:52 PM
link   
reply to post by discl0sur3
 


But you did post a Behind image - not the same at all. Keep the facts as facts. I'm still intrigued as to why NASA and the observations from the satellites positioning don't match though. It looks, to my untrained eye, as though Venus would be behind the sun relative to Aheads position and therefore would be obscured from view.

Also... wouldn't Mercury be on the opposite side of the image based on the positions posted earlier, or are the images reversed for whatever reason? It actually looks more probably like Venus based on the relative positions which would confirm NASA's viewpoint, but as I say without knowing the exact location of the satellite and its precise field of view, with what we have I still say Venus should be behind the sun and Mercury should be to the left of this picture, not the right...

If I'm being an idiot, please don't hold back let me know



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Violater1
But where is Mercury in stellarium, and where is Venus in LASCO?


In Stellarium, Mercury is directly next to the Sun in his picture. The word "Mercury" is actually covering the sun, you can see a little circle next to the Sun indicating Mercury's position.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:58 PM
link   
This is a link to today’s current STEREO COR2 AHEAD.
media.abovetopsecret.com...&action=view&id=87913

And NASA’s
stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...
My, it is interesting to look at. Although it is already between us and the Sun. Really not to far away.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:58 PM
link   
reply to post by misteRee
 


Lol...are you serious?
It's to scale in size...not distance, or the image would be about 1000 feet long...lmao



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 05:01 PM
link   
reply to post by Pr0t0
 


Not being an idiot, I appreciate your comments.
You're absolutely right, let's compare apples to apples. I just posted a COR2 Ahead image to coincides with the others, it contains both Venus and Mercury in the frame.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 05:03 PM
link   
It's VENUS!



It's going to pass right behind the Sun.

The scientist you e-mailed was correct. That is because he is responsible for updating all the information on the STEREO website.

There was no coronal ejections, you fooled yourself.

I can go outside right now and see exactly where Venus is, and it is exactly where it should be on the STEREO images.

Educated yourself before you spew a bunch of garbage!

[edit on 25-4-2010 by tOhNeE]





new topics

top topics



 
65
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join