posted on Apr, 27 2010 @ 01:00 PM
I find it interesting that if people bring evidence into play, then the response is often that you're trying to be superior. No. The game in a
discussion such as this is to bring evidence onto the table to make it possible to arrive an some type of informed decision. The other ploy I see so
often is the ploy that goes "I don't know, and no else knows either." That's what discussions are all about - learning new info and trying to
understand how the world about is works.
In this case evidence was presented from predictions of planetary positions, optical studies, gravity studies, satellites, news articles, scientific
journals, and NASA employees. This was a wide range of information to digest and it pointed conclusively at the answer as Venus.
During the presentation of this evidence questions and denials arose. Statements were made about comets, interplanetary dust, books, myths, etc.
These other pieces of evidence were also evaluated.