LETTER FROM NASA SCIENTIST Creates More Questions? Rogue Planet Alert!

If it is not Venus, then where is Venus?!

I dare the OP, and any of his followers, to answer that question.

[edit on 26-4-2010 by tOhNeE]

reply to post by Phage


Phage, I wasn't referring to the COR2 having the "NO DATA sticker" in place, it was Stereo Ahead HI1 not the Stereo Ahead COR2. However, Mr. Gurman pointed out that it was fixed and I checked on the website and there is an updated image. Seriously though....I was pondering it in my mind... I was very suprised to even get a response, let alone one so quickly as I was sure all the NASA folks wouldn't be reading their Nasa.Gov emails after midnight. Seems Nasa isn't excluded in employing night-owls.

reply to post by Skyline74


very true, we will find out, i am not hoping it is int Venus
but altogether im believing that with ALL data from this forum

and my own verification, i dont think it is, hopefully whatever it is will be no threat and this will all be over.

reply to post by tOhNeE


if it were venus it would show on the behind stereo not on the ahead , so care to explain that?

reply to post by ElijahWan


Gotcha.
Odd though, I didn't get the tag on H1 either.
I've also talked with Gurman. He's very responsive.

reply to post by themovement1


No... do YOU care to explain your incorrect post that got stars?

I don't understand how you can make up such an invalid answer, and then have the guts to post such an invalid answer.

You are 100% wrong. I don't see why you would post without first verifying your statement?

Everything about your post is illogical. I don't even understand how you got a star. I guess being completely wrong is worthy of getting stars!

So... I guess you think this graph is wrong?

Blue is the Behind camera... it is not even close to facing Venus.

Venus should only be visible in the STEREO Ahead camera. (which it is!)

So your post is so wrong, I don't even really understand how you can post such a comment, and get a star for it..

The ignorance in this topic is giving me headache!


[edit on 26-4-2010 by tOhNeE]

If people are not familiar with Project Pan-Starrs they might want to check it out.

Pan-STARRS - wikipedia
The project is mapping everything down to magnitude 24. That's dim.

In 2004 Jewett stated that "we would have observed such an object by now if it orbited within 320 AU from the Sun." This was in reference to a Pluto sized object, which is 18% the mass of our moon.

So check out that effort to see why there is no possibility of a new planet in the solar system. Remember this is visual, not a gravity study.

reply to post by tOhNeE


Go look at the chart for its orbit in 2010,its well below the sun

reply to post by tOhNeE


the object in question is in a lower orbit than the venus that you have on your graph!!! can you not see this?!!

reply to post by gamma 49


Gamma 49, I have all the charts and many different solar system simulators. Heck I even made my own solar system simulator 2 years ago that is telling me the same thing. Venus is exactly where it should be, and that is visible from STEREO Ahead COR2.

Please, how about you show me the chart that you think you are looking at!

Please... press the Print Screen button on your keyboard, load it in Paint.exe and save it, and then upload to ATS media. I want you to prove me wrong with your charts, I dare you.

Until then, you are all talk. Nothing but b.s. coming from the other side now..

reply to post by themovement1


Really? Show me... Show me where Venus is exactly in relation to the STEREO A. Show me your charts!

You have nothing!

reply to post by tOhNeE

NASA is covering this up by editing venus from the behind cor
and making the object in question seem to be venus! with all the tech they have , of course they can do this, especially with all of the sudden down time or sorry "" delay" but soon we will find out it is infact not venus!!

gentlemen

i thought some here had already
learned not to feed the trolls.
Do we have to put up the signs again?? lol
30 pages ??? ur kidding right ???

Here is a 3D graph showing the position of STEREO A, and the position of Venus. I circled them both in red. The red dot in the middle is the Sun's location.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/aff57cb13370.png[/atsimg]

This proves that Venus is in Stereo A's field of view.

Thank you, come again.





[edit on 26-4-2010 by tOhNeE]

reply to post by tOhNeE


THEN WHY IS IT NOT IN THE BEHIND VIEW? AND STILL VENUS IS IN TO HIGH OF AN ORBIT TO BE WHAT WE ARE SEEING IN THE AHEAD CORE!

[edit on 27-4-2010 by themovement1]

reply to post by themovement1


We already know from gravity studies and by optical means that this is not a new planet. You need to figure out what you are doing wrong and correct it. The other posters are willing to help you out. That's why they are posting here.

reply to post by stereologist
I HAVE NEVER SAID THAT THE OBJECT IS IN FACT A PLANET!
i have stated i do not know what it is , that is why i am here!!

Originally posted by themovement1
reply to post by tOhNeE

 

NASA is covering this up by editing venus from the behind cor and making the object in question seem to be venus!

Venus is nowhere near STEREO B's field of view! I can go outside at night and show you this without NASA or anybodies assistance! Stop with the B.S.!

I already posted a graph showing you that STEREO B is not even facing Venus!
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Originally posted by themovement1
with all the tech they have , of course they can do this, especially with all of the sudden down time or sorry "" delay" but soon we will find out it is infact not venus!!

Please tell me how NASA is able to change the rotation of the planets.. I would like to know.

Venus is visible with the naked eye, from Earth. Everything you say is complete B.S. and there is nothing else I can say about your actions besides that.


[edit on 27-4-2010 by tOhNeE]

reply to post by themovement1


It's Venus. So far you've posted 0 evidence, and have been a stalwart denier.