It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

LETTER FROM NASA SCIENTIST Creates More Questions? Rogue Planet Alert!

page: 18
65
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:49 AM
link   
lol nice...mmk not nibiru but something...your insults are fine with me It's all good...anyone trusting the government and government run agencies are deeply irreparably mentally challenged.

[edit on 26-4-2010 by NWOWILLFALL]




posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:55 AM
link   
Warning this is very poorly typed. Sorry for any confusion. And I can't spell


I got up to page 9 and had to post something

So it's like this; there's an object people think is Nibiru. Everyone that's forth anything about are bad mouth and cridized for what believe is their inhability to deal with the truth cause truth is it could happen.

Now I went to a video on YouTube that talked about the object effecting are gravatational stuff. Now I don't know anything about that but I didn't even see anyone mention that. You want data there it is.

The one I disagree is the time. I don't we should assume it's 2012 but 2 weeks? Just estimate something on an eliptical course that would be here that soon. It almost push us out of orbit or sething crazy like that. I like it's probably coming around the long curve of the oval or something anyway

Mircury, Venus, I can't remember the name of the camera but the A and B one. In the B pictures the anomally was moving right to left and that same photo I saw what understand to be Mircury moving left to right. In the A camera you see one object and was moving left to right. I dont what should be there but fr the diagram of the camera's possition I doubt it was venus though it maybe Venus in the A camera but I feel you would never see it from that angle unless the camera was really off.
I have a thoery on the anomaly those. In those camera's I don't think can tell distence very well but what if the object was past the other camera and it's size on the picture is that way cause it's still by like Beptune or something idk just a thought.

I do believe something really up, NASA being weird all these YouTube videos random data, prophosy, the timewave zero thing I mean it's not there's no evidence it just not proven and even raw photage and data doesn't help these idiots that don't see the logic connecting it all. Whatevers gonna happen will show it's face soon.

Anyone people just don't be as stupid as your making yourself. There's no need to insult a thoery.

[edit on 26-4-2010 by IamBlack]



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:57 AM
link   
reply to post by IamBlack
 


Thanks for the fantastic comment...very well put!



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:57 AM
link   
reply to post by ChemBreather
 


It doesn't have ANY wrong info! It's a graph showing the position of the planets, sun and satellite, it was NEVER meant to be a "to scale" graph of the size of the planets and sun. It's just to show position data, not size data!

Now to further PROVE this ENTIRE TOPIC is a HOAX and everyone who has doubted me is 100% incorrect... here is a picture OF THE SAME EXACT THING IN 2008!

July 15, 2008


Now to prove that is Venus.. here is a few days later when Mercury arrives into view:
August 3, 2008


Now here is the object the OP tried to fool everyone with:

April 21, 2010


You see how they match?

THIS HAS HAPPENED BEFORE AND WILL HAPPEN AGAIN!

CASE CLOSED! IT'S VENUS!


[edit on 26-4-2010 by tOhNeE]



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:58 AM
link   
reply to post by tOhNeE
 
Like i thought o common sense



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:58 AM
link   
Gotta agree that nailed it on the head



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 02:06 AM
link   
reply to post by tOhNeE
 


seriously. thanks,

good god man.
18 pages of this!


[edit on 26-4-2010 by Ahmose]



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 02:06 AM
link   
This thread is a interesting experience for me.

I believe in the possibility that Nibiru/Planet X is very real but most of the people in here arguing 'on the side of Nibiru' so to speak are demonstrating themselves to be gullible fools and plain old idiots.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 02:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by muggl3z
This thread is a interesting experience for me.

I believe in the possibility that Nibiru/Planet X is very real but most of the people in here arguing 'on the side of Nibiru' so to speak are demonstrating themselves to be gullible fools and plain old idiots.


for sure

bye

[edit on 26-4-2010 by Ahmose]



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 02:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by tOhNeE
...............
Not being able to explain things is common. But the rotation of the planets around the Sun has been known for so long that it is nearly impossible to EVER mistake a planet for something else.

It's like watching a person go around a merry-go-round. You know when the person will show up, and where the person is. There is no reason to think that it is a different person each revolution.


In this case you are right, but you are wrong in the claim that we know the reason for each planet's rotation.

All planets have a short elliptical orbit, except the dwarf planets like Pluto and Sedna have long elliptical orbits. It is as if something massive is pulling them in the oposite direction.

There are other anomalies, which I have posted before and which can't be explained by any of the models that we have. That is except if there is a dead star which is a companion star to our Sun.

Research even shows that as once satellites like Pioneer were being affected by some force, comets are now also being affected and arrive days earlier than they are supposed to.

Not only that but something massive is causing the secular increase in the AU, distance, between the planets in our Solar System and the Sun.

So again, what is causing all of this and other anomalies such as the strange elliptical orbits in dwarf planets, and even every planet in our Solar System?



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 02:11 AM
link   
reply to post by tOhNeE
 


tOhNeE.....

Amongst others, you & Phage have shown this thread to be a willful waste of members' time.

It's a shame to see the interesting material on ATS being buried by this noise.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 02:18 AM
link   
My big problem with this type of thread, and the whole "rogue planet" thing is that if a planet(!) sized object were suddenly this close to the sun I have the sneaky suspicion that some of the hundreds of thousands of astronomers out there might have - you know - noticed it...

Really - I see all these pictures here, and it's always great fun to see stuff like this - but really people...

There are thousands and thousands of amateur astronomers in every major country... if a thing the size of Pluto - let alone "Saturn" or "A Brown Dwarf" were to scuttle along inside our solar system... believe me - it would be all over the astronomy sites and the news.

And if it were anywhere near the inner planets, I have the sneaky suspicion we'd be able to see it... you know... with the naked eye... just like... you know... Mercury, Venue and Mars.

It's okay - carry on now - but, please consider the way this looks... I mean - everyone really needs to seriously consider buying a lot of tinfoil for their hats if they are seriously thinking this is anything other than an anomoly or... you know... MERCURY... or VENUS...

I'm willing to take bets that we're not about to see "the end of the world"...

Oh - that's unless all the amateur astronomers in the world are in on the conspiracy!

TTFN
askbaby
(corrected my spelling mistake!)

[edit on 26-4-2010 by askbaby]



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 02:18 AM
link   
hahaha dude thats the best signature yet...anyways what can we do right? Just be prepared and like I said hope it's a spaceship =]



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 02:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by NWOWILLFALL
hahaha dude thats the best signature yet...anyways what can we do right? Just be prepared and like I said hope it's a spaceship =]


You talkin' to me?



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 02:21 AM
link   
Yeah dude I almost spit out my cereal when you changed it lol



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 02:35 AM
link   
reply to post by tOhNeE
 


A graph isn't proof

Explain this then
www.nationalledger.com...

Then The AirForce responded by stating



made public only a general description of the mission objectives: testing of guidance, navigation, control, thermal protection and autonomous operation in orbit, re-entry and landing."


www.vanityfair.com...

They wont tell of course.
Hack even the media is taking it like they dont know for what it will be doing but i have some good guess.


And Also explain this then
www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 26-4-2010 by Agent_USA_Supporter]



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 02:38 AM
link   
and what is your guess?



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 02:40 AM
link   
this letter could be real here is nasa s policy on comunication with the public



(d) NASA, as an Agency, does not take a position on any scientific conclusions. That is the role of the broad scientific community and the nature of the scientific process. NASA scientists may draw conclusions and may, consistent with this policy, communicate those conclusions to the media. However, NASA employees who present personal views outside their official area of expertise or responsibility must make clear that they are presenting their individual views – not the views of the Agency – and ask that they be sourced as such.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 02:42 AM
link   
reply to post by tOhNeE
 


OKEY, it is Venus.
Still your diagram isnt showing the correct info does it .
Your 'lines' give the impression that the Co2 cant have anything BUT the Sun in View, you have to widen the field of view on those lines, as venus is way out to the right according to your diagram with the Fov lines..

I dont think I said this was anything other than venus, I kicked on the diagram......



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 02:46 AM
link   
reply to post by ChemBreather
 


I JUST TOLD YOU, the size of the objects in the graph are not to scale! This means the Sun icon in the middle should be smaller. The position data is all correct. The size of the objects are NOT.

Do you understand that? At all?



new topics




 
65
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join