It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

LETTER FROM NASA SCIENTIST Creates More Questions? Rogue Planet Alert!

page: 17
65
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by NWOWILLFALL
Now I feel like I'm talking to a child...a lot of disinfo agents come here so I wouldn't be surprised if you have ties with nasa considering you wont give a source as to why you are so educated on the subject.



Alex Jones did say the army has stated they have people on message boards trying to bait people on stuff like this. but this thread just seems like one big circle jerk.




posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:02 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Sorry Phage your wrong this time.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:03 AM
link   
Here are some images supporting my theory that there, perhaps something orbiting this object....this also illustrates forward movement.



One hour later



[edit on 26-4-2010 by discl0sur3]



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:04 AM
link   
As I've said in previous posts Alex the fraud Jones is what they call co-intel...trust me bro It's much worse than he says.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:06 AM
link   
reply to post by ChemBreather
 


Are you talking about this object?


Or this object?


Both objects are not even near the Sun, let alone behind it! They are both to the right of the Sun.

If you are talking about the first object, it is an artifact that has been on the STEREO COR2 images for the past few years in the same exact spot. The STEREO satellites orbit around the Sun, so unless this object is in orbital lock with the satellites, and is 1/10th the size of the Sun (huge) it's an artifact on the STEREO satellite camera itself, and not a real object.

The second object is Venus.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by tOhNeE
 


tOhNeE.....

The op has now removed the signature link to his website, etc...


What did I remove?



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by NWOWILLFALL
hmm nice one bro...anyways I'd like to know when this artifact got there and why it seems bigger then the planets around it...


haha....so would we all my friend. Watch the videos in this thread, should help you out



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by tOhNeE
reply to post by Phage
 




Here is a picture from COR2:


Here is a picture from HI1:


As you can see, COR2 is showing VENUS. Although in the Stereo Orbit Graph it appears Venus is behind the Sun, it is not, that is a scale issue with the planet and sun icons. Venus is still visible to STEREO A COR2, it hasn't gone behind the Sun yet.

HI1 is showing Mercury, but that isn't the object that was in question.

All images above are from April 21st 2010.

[edit on 26-4-2010 by tOhNeE]


On the top picture, the claim is that Cor2 looks at the sun with the sun in the center, and venus is behind the sun, and the screen from cor2 you see the object to the right in the picture, that is contradiction, it cant be two places at ones: Behind the sun as pointed out in the diagram and to the right in the pitcure..

[edit on 26/4/2010 by ChemBreather]



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:11 AM
link   
reply to post by discl0sur3
 


No that doesn't support your theory.. I already proved that you are pointing to Venus!

Check this post:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Venus is a planet that is orbiting, and rotating around an axis. It is reflecting the Sun light but not at a constant rate, it is changing because of the orbit and rotation of the planet. Also, objects like space dust pass between the camera and Venus and also have small effects on the light reflection.

All you have done is taken to images from different times, and noticed the light reflecting from both has changed, and the very harsh image compression made it look even worse.

All you pointed out was a change in light reflection which is normal because no planets reflect a constant and even amount of light.. it always flickers a little.

[edit on 26-4-2010 by tOhNeE]



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:14 AM
link   
reply to post by tOhNeE
 


Dude what are you smoking, no way that huge thing is venus come on be real.Common sense what tell this much. And what i find in so called brainiacs they have zero common sense



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by ChemBreather
On the top picture, the claim is that Cor2 looks at the sun with the sun in the center, and venus is behind the sun, and the screen from cor2 you see the object to the right in the picture, that is contration, it cant be two places at ones: Behind the sun as pointed out in the diagram and to the right in the pitcure..


ChemBreather, this following image is NOT to scale. Meaning the size of the Sun, the size of Venus and Mercury, and Earth, and the Satellites are NOT correct. Their positions however ARE...

Venus is NOT behind the Sun, it only appears that way in the graph because the icons are not to scale. In reality, Venus is still to the right of the Sun by a very large distance. The graph itself is not designed to show that much accuracy.

However, if you were to shrink the size of the Sun and Venus in the graph, and keep their positions the same, it would all fit 100%.

You are being fooled by a graph that is not really designed for what you are using it for. It's just for reference. If you could zoom in on the graph, it would probably show a much larger gap... but there is no zoom feature.



I explained this 5 times already.


[edit on 26-4-2010 by tOhNeE]



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by gamma 49
reply to post by tOhNeE
 


Dude what are you smoking, no way that huge thing is venus come on be real.Common sense what tell this much. And what i find in so called brainiacs they have zero common sense



This I agree with you on. I have seen some smart people make me question their common sense.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:20 AM
link   
Exactly they come on here and question our intelligence they think they are special because they might have a spot when all this goes down...I'm not dumb bro that may have been the craziest explanation yet....done listening to agents if it's not true then it doesn't matter....right?



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:22 AM
link   
reply to post by gamma 49
 


Dude, you need to go to school.

The size of the object in the image is not the actual size! Duh! Get some common sense!

The object is reflecting a large amount of light, and is only appearing to be super large.

That is how Venus ALWAYS looks in the STEREO images! Educate yourself before you make yourself look like a fool!



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:30 AM
link   
This type of thread has appeared a number of times sense August of 09 (since I got to Iraq on this tour). Phage has debunked this to most people's satifaction at least 3 times that I can recall (this being the third). Appearatnly this mass will eventually go behind the sun and come out the other side ..(if I remember right).
A couple of things that I question on this thread.
-How is it that a scientist working for NASA cannot distinquish between Mercury and Venus?
-The most obvious question I have is..there are only so many "heavenly bodies" passing by the sun and picked up by the the Stereo Camera system. So it should be academic..Venus is where it is suposed to be and so is Mercury and there is or is not an extra globe out there...I dont see how there can be so many variant possiblities.
The skies in Iraq are very clear and late in the evening you can see all sorts of things wipping through the sky and even got to see a partial eclipse of the moon at the end of last year.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:37 AM
link   
reply to post by tOhNeE
 


Fos christ sakes, dont put up a picture with wrong info when trying to correct some one esles mistakes, that dont makes sense.

As I see it, it looks like a way to guard your self from all possible theories/ideas from others.


So, the Graph is wrong and shouldnt be used to 'debunk' this then, as of the Fov(Field of view) on the Cor2 is illustrated to look at the sun and the sun only.

And stuffing Venus behind the sun on the diagram and say that in the picture you have venus to the right when the illustration shows that Cor2 do not look that wide... LOL. I hope you got this....

Again, I am not saying there is any thing in these pictures, I just find it odd that there are objects left right on both satalletis and travels above the sun and not below the sun.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:38 AM
link   
Yeah every time I call an obvious agent an agent they flee lol...nibiru or not like I said before those massive underground bases are gonna be used for something and believe me I'll be waiting in denver.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:41 AM
link   
reply to post by NWOWILLFALL
 


I have some information that Denver is not going to be safe for citizens. Its an area that could be likened to front row, so to speak for their sell out of humanity and the altars and horrific stuff they plan to hand us out to dealing with dark ones, and dumping bad karma on people with wars, starvation and envrionmental abuses.

Its one of the reasons to avoid fema or go underground on their train systems. We have to rescue people from that. I mean literally, if it ever takes off that way, we have to form resistances and break people out of that.

[edit on 26-4-2010 by Unity_99]



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:44 AM
link   
Oh of course not the radiation will penetrate a mile deep...you think that's why I'm going...no I'm not going down without a fight...I'm not making threats it doesn't have to come down to this.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 01:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by tOhNeE
reply to post by gamma 49
 


Dude, you need to go to school.

The size of the object in the image is not the actual size! Duh! Get some common sense!

The object is reflecting a large amount of light, and is only appearing to be super large.

That is how Venus ALWAYS looks in the STEREO images! Educate yourself before you make yourself look like a fool!


dude,
it's not worth it.

you know...

often times.. (ok most) I am also thinking phage is 'wrong' or 'off'.. lol...
and I just cant believe how he thinks he has a logical explanation for everything...

however..
in this thread
i am starting to understand how phage must often feel.

damn.
like i said earlier, im in the 'foil hat' crowd usually..
but this is venus,
and i quit. lol

"agents" all over.... look out

wtf


enjoy.
im out.

[edit on 26-4-2010 by Ahmose]



new topics

top topics



 
65
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join