It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

LETTER FROM NASA SCIENTIST Creates More Questions? Rogue Planet Alert!

page: 10
65
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by tOhNeE
Listen carefully people..

The object in question arrives into view of Stereo A at April 21, 2010. From that date until April 25, 2010 (today) the object has moved at the exact rate that Venus moves.

You all have been fooled by the OP.

It is VENUS.


Further more....do you truly believe that I want this to be true? The implications of a rogue planet/star/comet or whatever it is would be staggering. I have a family, friends and many people that I love in my life and I wish nothing more than for this to NOT be true. So let's get to the bottom of the matter and debunk this at all costs. However, until I have concrete evidence either way, I personally will not be able to come to a solid decision about what this thing actually is.




posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:14 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:15 PM
link   
reply to post by discl0sur3
 


I Guess we will see by 2012



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by Pr0t0
but I'm still not happy with the responses as to the satellites position and its field of view. The two don't correlate.



Yes they do correlate, all you have to do is play with the STEREO ORBIT TOOL to find out:

stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov...

Play with the date and watch how Venus moves counter clockwise each passing day.

Then you browse Archive by date:
stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov...

You CAN NOT draw a line from STEREO A to Venus using the STEREO ORBIT TOOL to see if Venus would be behind the Sun or not. It is NOT to scale. If that tool had a zoom feature, you would see a huge gap between Venus and the Sun from STEREO A's perspective.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:15 PM
link   
I really like this post because it makes me want to ask the following question regarding space weather? Who is Wouter Verhesen? He is on the front page of space weather, but when you click his name you just get a hotmail account to email him. It seems that when you google this astro-photograher not too much shows up. The bottom line is that there are people out there with solar telescopes and I wonder if we are actually seeing what is really happening on the sun.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:16 PM
link   



Thanks man, my skin is thick. I'm an employer so I'm used to taking sh#$ on a daily basis, I say...bring it on

Later!



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by discl0sur3
 


Like I said.....





Do you have anything to add to this conversation? If not, please stop posting as there are others that would like to contribute.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:23 PM
link   
reply to post by discl0sur3
 


Discl0sur3.....

Sorry.....

I simply believe that you're too smart to get hoodwinked by all that Nibiru type BS.

I've said enough.....possibly a liitle too much & a possibly a little too rudely.

So, I'll leave it at that.

[edit on 25-4-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:24 PM
link   
reply to post by discl0sur3
 


..but we all know you are lying because in your videos you yourself commented that you won't accept the answer that this is Venus or Mercury, you already made up your mind.

We all know your agenda, we are not dumb. People like you come around the net once a month!

All you care about are stars, flags, and a large view count on your YouTube videos. You don't care about accuracy of information, and if you did you would care BEFORE you post your fear mongering B.S.

You think you are helping with some disclosure, and you think it is your duty to help, but all you are doing is disclosing LIES and MYTHS that have never been confirmed to be true or real, EVER. Almost every single one of your topics covers something that has already been discussed and debunked.

You are NEW. You are just starting out, and you are going over all the B.S. that hundreds of ATS members have already gone through. You are not waking people up like you think, you are further putting them into a deeper sleep every time you post lies and b.s. inaccurate information.





[edit on 25-4-2010 by tOhNeE]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:24 PM
link   
There is another thing to bear in mind looking at the SOHO movies, and that is the synoptic views you get, you have to look at the times for every frame given, in this recent picture there is only one view, one frame 54, then it has gone. before that, the frames were around the half-hour mark, as was the following frame 55, but frame 56 was an hour later, and after that back to the "more usual" times,

www.youtube.com...



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:28 PM
link   
Hasn't this already been shown to be Mercury?

I've checked through Stellarium and I get the same results posted by a couple of other members, not to mention the data from SOHO. It' Mercury.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by discl0sur3
 


Discl0sur3.....

Sorry.....

I simply believe that you're too smart to get hoodwinked by all that Nibiru type BS.

I've said enough.....possibly a liitle too much & a possibly a little too rudely.

So, I'll leave it at that.


No offence taken, I understand that we are all individuals with differing opinions...I don't fault you for that. Thank you for the compliment.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by discl0sur3
reply to post by Phage
 


I agree and am aware of the "blooming" effect that you speak of. My suggestion to you is to download the last hi-res image of this object from the COR2 camera taken April 22nd (stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov...) and compare this to known images of Venus or Mercury or any other planet in our solar system for that matter. This is MORE THAN ONE object...my guess is it's a Brown Dwarf with 4 or 5 orbiting moons/planets.

[edit on 25-4-2010 by discl0sur3]


Well thats what we'd be talking about if it wasn't Venus or Mercury is Nemisis or a comet. Neat was very large.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by discl0sur3

Originally posted by NWOWILLFALL
an interesting document coming straight from NASA in the 80's about some weird object then it was hush hush


EXACTLY!
Watch this:
www.youtube.com...


I took pictures myself.
here is the thread.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Others ARE seeing this !!!



[edit on 25/4/2010 by shauny]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:40 PM
link   
Disclosur3, does NASA have ANY photos from any time period from the camera ahead or behind video that you believe are Venus? I ask because you refuse to believe this is Venus as NASA states. So, what photos have you looked at or studied from previous views of Venus from the ahead or behind view that you believe are Venus?

I don't see how you can say, and i quote "Don't tell me this is Venus" without providing a photo or photos of what Venus should look like in the ahead or behind view.

[edit on 25-4-2010 by curious_soul]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:41 PM
link   
reply to post by tOhNeE
 



First of all, never call me a liar. If you would take the time to read through this entire thread you will see that I've already explained my motives on more than one occasion. I don't give a sh#$ about ratings, flags, stars or any of the other crap that goes along with it. I'm here for one reason...to seek information on the truth. Do you truly believe that what you see in the news and read in the papers is fact? There is more truth in a National Enquirer than there is in the Washington Post...it's truly a sad world that we live when one can't even voice and opinion without getting attacked by knowledge-less banter by ignorant individuals. I will continue to start new threads in my mission to uncover the bull# that has been hidden from us for so long. I do mention in my video that Mercury or Venus doesn't hold water for me based on image comparisons that you will find earlier in this thread. Whatever "it" is, does not give off the same light signature as either Venus or Mercury....so, prove to me that it's one of these and I will gladly retract my statement!!!

 
Mod Note: Excessive Quoting – Please Review This Link
Mod Note: Profanity/Circumvention Of Censors – Please Review This Link.

[edit on Sun Apr 25 2010 by Jbird]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:43 PM
link   
To make things clear, it is confirmed that the object is not Mercury. It is now either Venus or something else...



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:43 PM
link   
Probably a lens flare who knows though my friend said he saw something bright that stayed still...maybe venus or another military toy...that they WILL use against us in the future. who knows though like I said probably a lens flare.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by curious_soul
Disclosur3, does NASA have ANY photos from any time period from the camera ahead or behind video that you believe are Venus? I ask because you refuse to believe this is Venus as NASA states. So, what photos have you looked at or studied from previous views of Venus from the ahead or behind view that you believe are Venus?

I don't see how you can say, and i quote "Don't tell me this is Venus" without providing a photo or photos of what Venus should look like in the ahead or behind view.

[edit on 25-4-2010 by curious_soul]


Watch this video...it's much more in depth than my findings and where I came to the conclusion that this isn't a planet. Fast forward through the first 2:30-3:00. Let me know what you think

www.youtube.com...



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:47 PM
link   
reply to post by discl0sur3
 


oh, yes that video, that was created by the same person who posted this -

www.abovetopsecret.com...




new topics

top topics



 
65
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join