It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by karl 12
Well I'm realy glad you're not in charge then.
snip
I doubt you'd feel the same way if someone said that about you.
Originally posted by yeti101
"I discount suggestions that UFO's contain beings from outer space. I think any visits by aliens, would be much more obvious, and probably also, much more unpleasant."
I am discounting reports of UFOs. Why would they appear only to cranks and weirdos?
Originally posted by tungus
Originally posted by yeti101
"I discount suggestions that UFO's contain beings from outer space. I think any visits by aliens, would be much more obvious, and probably also, much more unpleasant."
Obviously he (Stephen Hawking) didn't see the "Ancient Aliens" the other night on the History channel, or he wouldn't have made this statement. It is very obvious that the humans didn't build these megaliths nor they moved them up the mountains in Machu Pichu all by themselves, to give just one example.
Originally posted by yeti101
WOW!!!
This is Stephen Hawking saying this!!! WOW!! i was right all along.
Originally posted by yeti101
Theres no evidence of any probes out there but if we dont loook we will never find them even if they are there.
A video interview with Clifford Stone, Roswell, New Mexico, November 2006
Shot, edited and directed by Kerry Cassidy and Bill Ryan
Kerry: OK.
Clifford: Well, I’ll tell you this, I think that by 2016 that something better have happened. Because at 2016 I think that we’re going to have to announce to the world that there’s a probe that comes very close to the Earth every 15 or 20 years. And we’ve been calling it an asteroid. It’s not an asteroid. But it actually in reality is an artificial probe. In other words, somebody else put it here. They have found us long time ago. The technology will probably be pretty much on a par to, say, Voyager. It’ll be old antiquated technology by all their standards.
K: So what are you saying? Is this probe… do you know what race?
C: I’m saying we have already found it. Our paradigm says that it can’t be an artificial craft of any sort, therefore we refuse to accept that and we call it an asteroid. I’m talking about BG1991. Roughly 30 meters in diameter, highly polished surface. Asteroids don’t have a highly polished surface. It took corrective course changes to avoid collision with another asteroid. That don’t happen. This one it did.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by tungus
Originally posted by yeti101
"I discount suggestions that UFO's contain beings from outer space. I think any visits by aliens, would be much more obvious, and probably also, much more unpleasant."
Obviously he (Stephen Hawking) didn't see the "Ancient Aliens" the other night on the History channel, or he wouldn't have made this statement. It is very obvious that the humans didn't build these megaliths nor they moved them up the mountains in Machu Pichu all by themselves, to give just one example.
You went too far with that comment. Even VonDaniken admits there's no proof of ancient aliens, and his ideas are speculative, which is pretty much what that show confirmed, lots of speculation, no proof. Just because we don't know how humans did something, doesn't mean they couldn't have done it.
Are you willing to explain to me here what you exactly mean with your saying “I was right all along”.
People on this board like myself and others have been saying this for years with each new discovery. WOW!
Do you really think that when they would discover such a probe they would say that in public?
Originally posted by yeti101
hi spacevisitor, i mean basically the same as this comment from a similarly titled thread. www.abovetopsecret.com...
People on this board like myself and others have been saying this for years with each new discovery. WOW!
Such advanced aliens would perhaps become nomads, looking to conquer and colonise whatever planets they can reach.”
Originally posted by yeti101
same thing, an appeal to scientific authority which confirms my point of view. although stephen hawkings comments on ufos dont seem so well received and people suddenly not so eager to agree with him. At least im consistant! I would be interested to see if the OP of the other thread gives as much weight to his views on this as they do to his views on life in the cosmos. Somehow i suspect they wont.
Originally posted by The Shrike
Allow me to hoist you by your own petard: no one can say that about me, yet, because I'm a useful member of society..
Originally posted by yeti101
i think i did respond to your list of ufo cases in the thread about the sky at night program where they discussed ufos.
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to post by spacevisitor
intelligent beings existing somewhere else in the universe probably. In our galaxy im still on the fence. I think its possible theres others but i also think its possible we are alone in the milky way.
Scientists have reported finding a fundamental building block of life in samples of comet Wild 2 brought to Earth by NASA’s Stardust spacecraft.
The chemical, glycine, “is an amino acid used by living organisms to make proteins, and this is the first time an amino acid has been found in a comet,” said Jamie Elsila of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. “Our discovery supports the theory that some of life’s ingredients formed in space and were delivered to Earth long ago by meteorite and comet impacts.”
The discovery “supports the idea that the fundamental building blocks of life are prevalent in space, and... that life in the universe may be common,” added Carl Pilcher, Director of the NASA Astrobiology Institute which co-funded the research.
Originally posted by yeti101
i dont necessarily agree all tech civs would want to conquer other alien civs. Unless they have a good reason like habitable worlds are rare, they need a new home etc
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Where he went too far was with his "cranks and weirdos" comment as certainly some UFO eyewitnesses are credible observers like pilots and policemen, who are neither cranks nor weirdos. So he should give them credit that they've really seen a UFO, regardless of WHAT it is.
"The type of UFO reports that are most intriguing are close-range sightings of machine-like objects of unconventional nature and unconventional performance characteristics, seen at low altitudes, and sometimes even on the ground. The general public is entirely unaware of the large number of such reports that are coming from credible witnesses... When one starts searching for such cases, their number are quite astonishing. Also, such sightings appear to be occurring all over the globe." (Hearings before the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives, July 29, 1968.)
Dr. James E. McDonald, Senior Physicist at the Institute of Atmospheric Physics at the University of Arizona