It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Logarock
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Thats just great. Then you have noticed all the mushrooms in Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory? This is a serious question.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by Stormdancer777
i'm so sorry you went to the trouble of finding those as masqua has already stated that roman's (in this case, bishops) wrote them all, so your work was for nothing. all masqua is going to debate with proto about is whether it was the political figures or religious figures of rome, that wrote the new testament.
Originally posted by masqua
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by Stormdancer777
i'm so sorry you went to the trouble of finding those as masqua has already stated that roman's (in this case, bishops) wrote them all, so your work was for nothing. all masqua is going to debate with proto about is whether it was the political figures or religious figures of rome, that wrote the new testament.
Thanks for putting words in my mouth, since I said NO SUCH THING. I said that the texts were sorted by the bishops. As in "This one's good, this one's bad and this one's OK but needs an edit". You understand the difference between authors and editors, don't you?
Pulleeeze!
edit on 18/9/10 by masqua because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
For instance the King James version of the Bible, that word King???? Sounds a lot like King! Doesn't sound a lot like Peter Paul and Mary. Sounds like King.
Now can we say that the Pope is simply a religious figure? Or could we speculate and agree that he is both a political and religious figure?
You understand the difference between authors and editors, don't you?
That's what's happening, Rome wrote Christian Rome falling into the Bible, just like it orchestrated the death of Pagan Rome.
You mean the bishops wrote it in, don't you?
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Yet because many poster's belief systems lay in the past, they would prefer to keep going backwards instead of forwards.
Further to hold us all hostage to that.
Originally posted by undomy thoughts were as follows: proto says the prophecies of the fall of CHRISTIAN ROME were written into the bible by rome. you corrected him and said it was the bishops of rome that wrote it in.
so is that writing or no?
here's the post where you said it: www.abovetopsecret.com...
The author of Revelation calls himself John, and ecclesiastical tradition has held Saint John the Evangelist to be the author. However, in view of such evidence as the linguistic differences between Revelation and the Gospel of John, also traditionally ascribed to John the Evangelist, many scholars have been inclined to attribute Revelation to some other prominent early Christian writer. They suggest, for instance, Saint Mark or John the Elder.
Eusebius wrote of Revelation:
"The phrasing itself also helps to differentiate between the Gospel and Epistle[s of John] on the one hand and the book of Revelation on the other. The first two are written not only without errors in the Greek, but also with real skill with respect to vocabulary, logic and coherence of meaning. You won't find any barbaric expression, grammatical flaw, or vulgar expression in them. ... I don't deny that this other author had revelations ... but I notice that in neither language nor in style does he write accurate Greek. He makes use of barbaric expressions and is sometimes guilty even of grammatical error ... I don't say this in order to accuse him (far from it!), but simply to demonstrate that the two books are not at all similar."
The belief in a common authorship between Revelation and the Gospel of John was challenged by many Christian heretics late in the 2nd century and by many orthodox Christian leaders in the early 3rd century. But the belief prevailed in the early church. If it were otherwise, the Revelation might not have made it into the official canon. Apostolic authorship was an important factor in the decisions of which books were to be accepted into the canon.
Originally posted by masqua
However, this does not, I repeat, not suggest that the entire New testament was penned by the church itself.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
I find it truly sad, and primitive that the thread is degrading into a religious discussion.
There are so many places on ATS to have this discussion, which once again in fact takes us back to how religion protects the state and the power structure.
Since this thread is in essence about the state and the power structure, this ends up not being discussed so people can debate theology and ancient texts.
Primarily for religious reasons, that while they imagine that religion serves them well, it truly only serves the state well or those looking for absolution from the state for crimes against humanity.
As many have pointed out, true spirituality is found within and through nature, not through an organization like religion, and its books, who serve the state.
Originally posted by IAMIAM
The word of God is not found on Parchment. It is found all around us. It is interpreted in our heart. What is put on parchment is but one version, one Man's version of the word of God. The true Church of God is God. It his whole creation all around us. This is what Jesus told. This is why Jesus did not write any testaments himself. He taught people to open their eyes and see the testament of God!
And, he lived his life to show others how to worship God properly, by loving all of it.
With Love,
Your Brother
Vision Statement
Seven Principles of Cosmic Spirituality
1) The entire cosmos is the manifestation of Divine Mind-every molecule, every cell, every creature, every rock, tree, mountain, planet, blazing star, whirling galaxy and universe of galaxies.
2) We are all an integral, interconnected part of the whole cosmos and our own inner world is a holograph of the cosmos within us.
3) One basic datum underlies every religion under the sun, the principle of Incarnation. The Word or Logos, God's self-expression made manifest, has given the light of its divine spark to every mind/soul coming into the world. Christians call this the Christ or "Christ in us." Other faiths have different names or modes of expression for this same inner reality.
4) Every religion whose ethical core is summed up by the word "compassion" or "loving-kindness" to all other creatures without exception has a vision of the truth and is a valid "way" to Transcendence.
5)No one faith or religion-whatever its claims may be, alone has The Truth.
6)True cosmic spirituality is steeped in, flows from, and derives its most powerful analogies and metaphors from the natural world -- from the tiniest bit of dust to the spiraling stars above.
7)The core aim of cosmic spirituality is radical transformation, both personal and societal.
www.tomharpur.com...
My friend, I apologise if you perceive me to be distracting from your points. I only wish to connect them into a full picture. Yes the state is the power structure, but religion is its principle tool. You cannot understand the whole if you only look at the parts.
I asked if all your study and compilation revealed a way to destroy the power of empire. You did not answer.