It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I've seen them. I know.

page: 2
6
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 03:26 AM
link   
reply to post by Mr. Poptop
 


Mr. Poptop.....

I've tidied up the formatting in our Q&A post & if it's OK, I have some more questions.



Q: Did any of your friends see the object?

A: Yes.


Have you & your friends reported this sighting to a group such as MUFON?

Can any of your friends join our thread & verify your sighting & discuss this?



Q: In what direction were you facing?

A: East.


So in which direction do you believe the object travelling?



Q: How long did the object take to transit your field of view?

A: Not sure. It was there and I tried to mess with the stupid camera settings to get better pics. Then it was gone.


Can you "guesstimate" the time taken?



Q: How did the object leave your field of view?

A: I missed it disappearing becaues I was busy messing with the settings. It was bright outside, and I could barely see the LCD display on the camera.


Did you lose sight of it behind trees or a building, etc... or did it just take off into the sky?



Q: What was the apparent shape of the object?

A: It was round, and revolving slowly.


Do you mean round like a sphere or round like a cylinder?

What is it about the sighting that makes you conclude it wasn't a balloon?

How have you excluded that possibility?



Q: Have you seen anything like this previously?

A: No, hell no.



Q: Have your heard of any previous sightings in your area?

A: There was a meteor a while ago.


Have you searched on line with any sites sich as MUFON to ascertain if there have been other sightings?



Q: Was it windy?

A: Yes. Wind was blowing northeast 10 to 15 at ground level.


That is consistent with the direction of the object.

I note the wind velocity & direction could have been different at a greater height.



Q: Do you live in a busy area?

A: Yes. Lots of apartments.


I wonder if there were any other witnesses.....have you asked around?



Q: Are there any airports nearby?

A: There's one within five miles northwest of here.


You may be able to access met data for wind direction & velocity by height.

I wish I could view higher resolution photos of the object.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 25-4-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]




posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:02 AM
link   
ive got them blown up to 4000 mp, lol
and at first i think 'hot air balloons'..
but as i zoom in further to the already upscaled images...
it starts to look like.....i dont know what...
but i dont think a balloon....
maybe....
maybe not
lol

one looks 'hexagonal' ....

does anyone see that?



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ahmose
ive got them blown up to 4000 mp, lol
and at first i think 'hot air balloons'..
but as i zoom in further to the already upscaled images...
it starts to look like.....i dont know what...
but i dont think a balloon....
maybe....
maybe not
lol

one looks 'hexagonal' ....

does anyone see that?


Ahmose.....

I thought there was a "hexagonal" element to it.

Can you post the exif data?

Can you post any enlargements of the object?

Kind regards
maybe...maybe not



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not

Originally posted by Ahmose
ive got them blown up to 4000 mp, lol
and at first i think 'hot air balloons'..
but as i zoom in further to the already upscaled images...
it starts to look like.....i dont know what...
but i dont think a balloon....
maybe....
maybe not
lol

one looks 'hexagonal' ....

does anyone see that?


Ahmose.....

I thought there was a "hexagonal" element to it.

Can you post the exif data?

Can you post any enlargements of the object?

Kind regards
maybe...maybe not


sure,

well, im not sure got to get the exif data on my ubuntu box yet..

but heres the blow-ups..

the 'hexagonal' one..


the.. balloon/not a balloon? one......



ill work on gettin the exif data with gimp somehow. lol

oops:.. did you want the whole enlarged pic also?...
ill upload them..
(hm... i think they are too big, looks like ats resized them back down to OPs size?)
hmm...

[edit on 25-4-2010 by Ahmose]

[edit on 25-4-2010 by Ahmose]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 05:29 AM
link   
reply to post by Ahmose
 


Ahmose.....

In addition to any info that indicates the photos have been manipulated or processed.....

I will be very interested to know the time interval between the photos & if the photos are in sequence.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:40 AM
link   
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


I didn't had any problem downloading the images.

 

Mr. Poptop, could you please upload the images as they came out of the camera? Unless you have a camera that names the files as UFO1 and UFO2.


Thanks in advance.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:50 AM
link   
It looks like someone's throwing a ball into the air and taking pictures of it.....



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:53 AM
link   
Looks like two different structures to me. First is an older type barn-thing, the second looks much more modern. Also, it does seem as if these pictures are focused specifically on the structures. The first, just the roof of the barn-like one, and the second, it looks like someone was trying to get a shot of the two satellite dishes.

Was this taken in two locations? Or is that the same house?



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 07:54 AM
link   
Looks like two different structures to me. First is an older type barn-thing, the second looks much more modern. Also, it does seem as if these pictures are focused specifically on the structures. The first, just the roof of the barn-like one, and the second, it looks like someone was trying to get a shot of the two satellite dishes.

Was this taken in two locations? Or is that the same house?



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 08:15 AM
link   
You wrote that you took two pictures in rapid succession but I've looked at the data of the two pictures I am no expert but Adobe Bridge shows that there are four hours between the two images






posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 08:35 AM
link   
I'm normally not the most skeptical person, but i think it's fake, the object is more pixelated than the other darker area of the photo, also if anyone has half decent image software, save the photo and look for yourself, play around with it.

Look's fishy to me



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 08:35 AM
link   
reply to post by peterfromdk
 


Good pick up - Nice one!!!


Hoaxeer



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 10:34 AM
link   
Can we see the 'cigar shaped' ufo photo you uploaded by mistake?

WG3



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 11:12 AM
link   
reply to post by peterfromdk
 


I don't think we'll be seeing Mr Poptart anytime soon...

Do you?



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 12:20 PM
link   
reply to post by peterfromdk
 


Excellent catch. After reading your post I realized something I can't believe I missed. For two quick shots that are supposed to be in succession -- a large amount of clouds either "appeared" or "disappered" faster than nature would allow.
I was skeptical enough from the outset, especially after OP had removed one picture of a cigar shaped object in the sky and replaced it with a round one.

Palming my face repeatedly now.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 12:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by peterfromdk
You wrote that you took two pictures in rapid succession but I've looked at the data of the two pictures I am no expert but Adobe Bridge shows that there are four hours between the two images




Makes you wonder if they read the T&C because purposefully trying to hoax the members of ATS is a banable offense.

I don't like having skepticism being labeled as rudeness either.

It is not rude to question the validity of something. It is not rude to warn someone that their actions if insincere could be punishable. I did not see anyone attack the OP even after it became obvious he was deliberately trying to pull the veil over their eyes.

I know you meant it can happen, but making statements like that is just insulting to the skeptical members of ATS who are seeking the truth and puts the op in a mindset that opposing views or skeptical questions should be deemed as rude.

Please don't call rudeness in a thread where none currently exists it just confuses those who have already posted and makes the situation that much more sensitive. Because then people are spending most of their time trying to find the right words for their questions to avoid being fingered as rude simply because they are looking for the truth. Do you get what I am saying?



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 12:28 PM
link   
Mr. Poptop just got his Top popped.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 01:14 PM
link   
reply to post by cripmeister
 


No, I do not think we are cripmeister
I just do not understand why someone does something like that.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 01:39 PM
link   
well,

thank you peter.


and mr. poptart.... thank you also...
for the waste of time. lol


"Ive seen them, I know"


and 'we see you, we also know"


god, the geek in mexico with the button on his roof window did better! lol

[edit on 25-4-2010 by Ahmose]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 01:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by peterfromdk
reply to post by cripmeister
 


No, I do not think we are cripmeister
I just do not understand why someone does something like that.


I think it was just a sunday afternoon prank. But he posted it on the wrong website didn't he



new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join