It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
On assignment to photograph Catalina Island for the US Navy, Mr. Leland Hanson of the Coast Guards, was in a helicopter when he filmed this object, which at first hovered, then sped across the length of the island. According to independent photographic experts, the disc's calculated velocity was between 130 to 170mph, and had no apparent wings or tail that would signify it as an airplane. However, researchers at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory computer enhanced the image and found that there might have been a tail rudder. The filming is shown first at real speed, then again in slow motion.
Better Quality
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Any reasonable explanations for this apparent conflict?
Originally posted by Grayelf2009
Well they have been around for a long long time....
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/7ffd31518095.gif[/atsimg] This was a hieroglyphics in the Temple of Osiris at Abydos.
I think there is a fundamental flaw in your question, my friend. You are assuming there is a conflict.
Originally posted by cripmeister
reply to post by Kandinsky
By asking Who's are these? you have already made the assumption that the objects/lights in the photographs belong to somebody/something. I don't want to make that assumption. I'd rather ask What is this? What is the most likely explanation of this? The conflict only arises when you jump ahead of things.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
The 50s technology of UFOs, if ours, isn't reflected by modern technology...
Originally posted by Kandinsky
The UFO images are intended to represent the reported activity of UFOs...not specifically those in the images. They are intended to suggest the high accelerations, turns and erratic behaviour of UFO reports.
Originally posted by ReVoLuTiOn76
That is because the UFO's are not ours, they are of space. People you can deny it all you want, but the proof is in the pudding.
Originally posted by karl 12
reply to post by Kandinsky
Kandinsky, very interesting thread! I suspect the Edwards AFB object may be a photographic anomaly but there are some very intriguing photos and videos out there - here's another strange one from Catalina island:
snip
Cheers.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/3035d6921500.jpg[/atsimg]
The Chop Clearance List
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
snip
Were the UFO in those reports actually performing such maneuvers or are were they only perceived to be? Outside of anecdotes, is there any video evidence of these craft performing such aeronautic feats?
Originally posted by karl 12
reply to post by The Shrike
Shrike, I agree about there being no unequivocable proof (or pudding) for the UFO subject and that the reported flight characteristics of these objects is very strange indeed - Pentagon/USAF spokesperson Albert Chop makes some interesting comments below about origin but I don't think we'll ever get any concrete answers from the USAF (or Office of Naval Intelligence).
snip
Cheers.
PS. please post anything you can find to conclude the Catalina object is an aeroplane.
Originally posted by The Shrike
I found some info about the Catalina Piper Cub and the documentary that showed the analysis of the 8mm film was included in one of Arthur C. Clarke's series, "Arthur C. Clarke's Mysterious World" which I preserved.
Originally posted by The Shrike
That's because neither the USAF, nor any other government and non-government agency nor anyone on planet earth has any authoritative answer, just romantic guesses.
Major Keyhoe's conclusion that the "Flying Sucers" are from another planet is an irresponsible conclusion for a person of his stature for he could not, if his life depended on it, prove it.
Air Intelligence Division Study No. 203 with the help of the Office of Naval Intelligence presents the first important clue that the Pentagon was well aware of the phenomenon's marine nature.
This document is one of the rarest documents in the national archives linking the Office of Naval Intelligence to any association with the investigation of the phenomenon and offers an early clue that the study of the UFO phenomenon did not fall totally within the realm of the Air Force. Could the naval UFO experience be more involved than the air force? Is there a possibility that the Navy had years ago created a special secret group to investigate the strange aerial and marine manifestations? These questions are unequaled in importance in understanding the UFO phenomenon and the evolution of the modern UFO cover-up. Air Intelligence Division Study No. 203 represents the tip of an iceberg, of naval involvement with the phenomenon that has gone unrecognized for over a hundred years.
A considerable collection of data indicates Naval experience with the phenomenon dated back to the turn of the century and the Navy had accumulated more knowledge and experience with the phenomenon than was previously known. The first journal to routinely publish reports about the phenomenon as early as the 1900's was the U.S. Naval Hydrographic Office's "Notice To Mariners". And the first name given to the enigmatic phenomenon by that same office was "Celestial Phenomenon" seen at sea. Almost fifty years later the air force would call these same enigmatic objects "Unidentified Flying Objects".
One account published in "Notice to Mariners" provides insight into an early serious naval interest in the enigmatic phenomenon. As curious sightings of strange flying objects seen at sea are nothing new in marine history. This one case in particular had the potential to affect and shape naval interest in the phenomenon early in the century more than any other UFO sighting.
Link
Originally posted by The Shrike
The photo of the Capitol (Wash., D.C.) has been proven to be reflections of the stret lamps.