It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Yes, you are incorrect. The jury came in, and said there's no evidence to back any of Steorn's claims. www.irishtimes.com...
Originally posted by Funk bunyip
The problem is, we don't know the level of integrity the jury had. Everyone has a price... and a predisposition.
I hear Ireland is nice this time of year.
So when a marketing firm suddenly announces that they've built a device that breaks the first law of thermodynamics
Originally posted by Izarith
For those who are unaware China now owns roughly 95% of all resource contracts on the entire planet, through their pseudo use of capitalism they have even positioned themselves first dibs on Americas highly regarded and preserved resources. Try to think of it as a corporate takeover.
With the worlds population at 600 billion and it's expected unprecedented growth in the very near future The moon will be a definite and all ready mapped out source for mining.
They will have you believe the the moons water is what is desired but this is only for facilitating mining on the moon, drinking, washing, solar steam power and oxygen for mining and colonising operations.
The real interest in the moon is it's rich cash of solar debris like HE3 and other isotopes our Earths atmosphere rejects from the sun. Nuk fusion is the future of power and near earth space travel. He3 is the key, any nation with out a space travel capabilities in their nations objectives has a very bleak future. China, India, and the USA will be the equivalent of the Arab oil rich nations of today.
there are other ways of creating actual star fusion in side a water bubble but the masses need some thing to do with their lives so it's reserved for Black ops.
Edit: Oh lol....I see why you made that post I uses the wrong waste.
And to think the PTB actually create conspiracies to through you guys off....what a waist of money.
Originally posted by Funk bunyip
Well this is bent.
I guess they kinda do state that huh. Who the hell says that and still expects to be taken seriously? I wish i'd seen that statement earlier, bunch of clowns. I wonder if they actually believe they are creating energy or if they have over-simplified on purpose?
ahahaha.. ok i give up on Steorn for now, you win.. wacky Irish..
Now back to the thread before we derail it further!
Originally posted by Whateva69
Free energy...I don’t get it, whats free about it ?
Is it free as in cost/money, or free meaning not using the earth’s recourses? eg: coal, oil, ect.
Either way someone has to make the machine / panel / wind turbine.
It takes energy to do that, let alone heaps of money,
Then I'm assuming they sell that energy to the public, I doubt they would let it get to and use in your home /workplace for free.
Can someone please enlighten me on the use of the word FREE ENERGY.
And then some people in the 'free energy' field wonder why it has such a bad reputation! The fact that these people can put that on their website means that they either do not understand how their own technology works( and surely that they have a extremely limited grasp of fundamental physics) or that their technology simply does not work.
Originally posted by fordrew
Hey, I am a mechanical engineering student and I just wanted to say one thing in this post.......... NOTHING IS EVER FREE! I just sigh at the people who think solar panels are free energy.
Originally posted by Toecutter.
Potential differences can be easily harnessed and they occur naturally this is where real free energy is.
Study Tesla's work until you understand it and you can gather all the energy you want, however it won't be free unless you are free.