It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I don't even believe in Nibiru, but please explain this video!

page: 5
85
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 10:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by stereologist
Salvia Divinorum is not an illegal plant in all places. It is legal where I live although politicians are discussing whether it should be made illegal.


According to McKenna, the active agonist in Salvia Divinorum is Salvinorin A and is chemically unique.
Because of this unique chemical makeup (it contains no nitrogen atoms and is not a plant alkaloid), it has already been classified as being most similar to table salt, chemically.

***He warned people from using this pure extract that is found readily***

Because of this, he stated that the politicians would be somewhat hamstrung when trying to make it illegal.

It is the same conundrum that they ran into with GHB (gamma hydroxybutyrate). GHB is produced naturally in the muscles during metabolism.
Therefore it is impossible to make possession of it illegal because we ALL possess it; however, due to the Interstate Commerce Clause, politicians can make it illegal to SELL.




posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by skeptic_al
reply to post by skeptic_al
 


so your not banned, or weren't banned?


As I rewatched the video it occurred to me the possibility of it being Mercury is still on the table for me. I say that based on solar flares that appeared to be caused be the object COULD have been affected by small comets and we can't tell that. Did you find a wider angle or a combined view in steoroscopic view? That would help determine if I saw flares going toward the object that were in fact influenced strictly by the object. Or it was normal response to collisions of comets or asteroids with the sun.


No not Banned and never was in a Band

This stuff is much better explained by Astrologers that spend all night
staring through a big Giant telescope.

Oddly Enough, not one of them has ever come forward to say they gave found Naburi.

The only ones claiming to have know where Nubino is are those that don't have big giant Telescopes



Thankyou , it just takes a bit of cohesive thinking, yes there is good ammout of data that he provided, and he has attempted to interprate it but no scientifically methodical sound bit of conclusion.

Peace to you skeptic
It isn't skeptisism its rational, reasoning thinking



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:02 AM
link   
reply to post by stereologist
 


Not to mention that those texts are ridiculously mistranslated.



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Archirvion
 


Nibiru is a myth. It doesn't exist. The original Sumerian doesn't refer to a planet with that name.


warning ***MAY CONTAIN SARCASM***

How could it not exist. It's as real as Scientology.
God, the next you'll be saying Scientology is not Science and it's not a
Tology, Church or Religeon. Ron Hubbard wrote several books on the subject,
why would lie about it.



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:07 AM
link   
It is just me, or does it seem incredibly egotistical to conclude what it is exactly we are looking at in the video?

Without proper equipment aren't we just making educated guesses? The responses ITT are ones are certainty, I just don't understand how anyone could be certain of what they are seeing here, at least someone who frequents ATS at least.



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:09 AM
link   
Great post dude! I have no idea what that was...very interesting though. I'm not sure if if I believe in Nibiru either...but whatever that object was in the video...boggles my mind!



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ouroborus2012
Maybe it's because it's 4:00 in the morning and i'm at work but, I simply can't understand why people come to a conspiracy website looking for scientific answers and why there are even people here who frequent the site looking to GIVE scientific answer and stomp said conspiracy theories....


I see it too and its quite annoying. I guess people put their trust in other people to tell them the truth because its far easier to do so than to attempt to understand something yourself.

Isnt this why we have politicians deciding policy, police fighting crime, military fighting for natural resources and power, and so on? We always have someone else that deals with the stuff so we dont have to understand it or deal with it.

We have a natural tendency to want to belong to whatever group of people we respect, so thats why its easy to control the masses once you get their respect. Even on this site. Avatars, points and all that are just symbols just like expensive cars, clothes or watches in real life.


[edit on 24-4-2010 by Copernicus]



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:19 AM
link   
If you go HERE , which is the STEREO site for these images, you will find that if you look in previous years, 2009-whenever, you will find this same object appearing roughly between April 19th-25th. It's part of our solar system, and it's been there.



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:25 AM
link   
The TimeWave Zero graph starts its final drop in 11-14-10, my friggen birthday! (Sarcastically) Fantastic! Unless this timewave zero has something to do with ME!!!! AHHHHH!!! honestly, I have NO IDEA what the timewave zero graph, which I see all over the place mind you, is or where it came from. Can anyone explain how it was created? Thanks.



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:25 AM
link   
My god how did this thread decline so quickly, hardly anything but speculation and bad grammar.

reply to post by Violater1
 

Violator1, I still disagree with you about the two object theory. If one object is moving forward on STEREO B, and then backwards on STEREO A it means that the object is closer and following a natural orbit around the sun.

stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov...

This seems to denote that the object is Mercury, one object that is hardly anything suspicious. But I would like to keep sifting through the SOHO and STEREO data and my charts to make sure, lets see if good intelligence can solve this problem!

PS: as a side note can the MODs stop these people from going on about Timewave Zero, that is not what this OP was about; also a request to know why the OP was banned.

[edit on 24-4-2010 by Aziroth]

[edit on 24-4-2010 by Aziroth]



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:25 AM
link   
Nibaru we are close here is a theroy of the Ancients

what if Nibaru is Venus and MARS Alignment ? and the Ancients saw this
Interesting Video does it have any hold! someone call Phage quick LOL

Is Phage one person or a group People ?
Nibaru we are close


link here if the video does not work www.youtube.com...



I do like the double star orbital theory also our sun binary twin Nemeses and SEDNA



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:29 AM
link   
[edit on 24-4-2010 by Isis_Is_I]



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:30 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


"Interesting.

In the first part of the STEREO B sequence the object moves ahead of the stars but toward the end of the sequence it moves at the same rate."

Phage, could you please elaborate on that 'interesting'?



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by Historymajor
Great post dude! I have no idea what that was...very interesting though. I'm not sure if if I believe in Nibiru either...but whatever that object was in the video...boggles my mind!



I don't think it's necessary to either believe or not believe. Surely one can have an open mind and be acceptable to any new information that turns up.

I dislike people who announce themselves to be in a certain camp on any subject. basically it means they have made their mind up and no amount information, ideas, or evidence is gonna change it.

So far as I know nobody has seen Niburu or knows what it is, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't maintain a constant vigilance for anything that might make things more understandable.

That's what ATS is for.



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by Wolfenz
someone call Phage quick LOL
Is Phage one person or a group People ?


He is your idol so why dont you ask him? Idols usually respond to their fans. Perhaps you can get his signature!



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:40 AM
link   
reply to post by Wolfenz
 


The video you posted is based on Velikovsky. What he claims happened is based on his personal interpretation of myths. The events he describes have been shown to violate all sorts of physics and astronomical laws. His claims have been shown to false for a large number of reasons.



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by EvolvedMinistry
 


It can't be Nibiru because we already can verify that no planet can enter the orbits of the known planets. Besides we know Serbstra is going to tell you that Nibiru is not a planet. Only Sitchin makes that mistaken translation.


So you are talking in terms, saying its not what they call nibiru, but it is what people call nibiru or planet x, its a term a symbol, and this is what they're talking about, including anything cyclical, such as nemisis, a binary dwarf star, a returning, rogue body of any kind, such as a big comet. It all boils down to the same thing.

And to say its Venus or Mercury without proving cordinates for those two at this time isn't going to cut it.

Also that timeline zero is reallly unsual.

Considering that I was told something about November 2010. And the giant plunge begins Nov 14?, well probably Nov 11, more likely, 11 11. Also, the new clock beings, Jan 1. In other words, time begins again, 01 01 11, or 11 11 again..

Well anyway, its a little strange.



[edit on 24-4-2010 by Unity_99]



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:55 AM
link   
reply to post by skeptic_al
 


Your handle read as the OP when I typed that message, I SWEAR!



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:57 AM
link   
reply to post by Unity_99
 


Unity 99 as I've told you countless times. No planets can exist within the orbits of the known planets without us having known about it for decades.

What I think is funny here is the double standard used by the 'whatever you want to call it' group. They demand that we establish with a huge pile of information that this is a known object. On the other hand, Unity 99 wants to make unsubstantiated claims based on nothing, or the fraudulent translations from Sitchin or the rabbit hole, or whatever is the dubious source du jour. Almost always there is no source.



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:57 AM
link   
So are we still none the wiser as to what this object is? As and amatuer astronomer, I am absolutely excited and dumbfounded as to it is.

If there is one thing I have learned from studying the Universe, it is that nothing is impossible, and that we humans have no idea whatsoever how this Universe conducts itself.

Another thing I have learned, is that the idea of another planet crossing through our solar system, is not as bizarre as some make out it to be. In fact, the mass campaign to ridicule something like this that would actually be very plausible in the grand scheme of things, gets me wondering why there is so much ridicule and tireless efforts to debunk such a theory.

In my opinion, this theory is more believable than some other totally accepted 'conspiracies', we live in a super massive, complex, unknown Universe, who are we to say what is and isn't possible?



new topics

top topics



 
85
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join