'Anonymous' hacks Revolution Muslim for South Park Fattwa!!

page: 17
112
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join

posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 02:05 AM
link   
reply to post by Retrovertigo
 


Australia is screwed anyway..

Our Leader is a wee little Hobbit, who came home from his last visit to Obama with a Chocolate Brown covered nose.

We might as well be just another American state!!




posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 02:10 AM
link   
reply to post by DINSTAAR
 


Very well put.

I'd like to quote a man ahead of his time, Bill Hicks:

"The world is like a ride in an amusement park. And when you choose to go on it, you think it's real because that's how powerful our minds are. And the ride goes up and down and round and round. It has thrills and chills and it's very brightly coloured and it's very loud and it's fun, for a while. Some people have been on the ride for a long time and they begin to question, is this real, or is this just a ride? And other people have remembered, and they come back to us, they say, "Hey – don't worry, don't be afraid, ever, because, this is just a ride…"

And we… kill those people.

Ha ha

"Shut him up."

"We have a lot invested in this ride. Shut him up. Look at my furrows of worry. Look at my big bank account and my family. This just has to be real."

Just a ride. But we always kill those good guys who try and tell us that, you ever notice that? And let the demons run amok. But it doesn't matter because: It's just a ride. And we can change it anytime we want. It's only a choice. No effort, no work, no job, no savings and money. A choice, right now, between fear and love. The eyes of fear want you to put bigger locks on your doors, buy guns, close yourself off. The eyes of love, instead, see all of us as one. Here's what we can do to change the world, right now, to a better ride. Take all that money that we spend on weapons and defences each year and instead spend it feeding and clothing and educating the poor of the world, which it would many times over, not one human being excluded, and we could explore space, together, both inner and outer, forever, in peace." - Bill Hicks

I don't think anyone could've put it better. I believe these extremist just need to relax and stop taking everything so seriously. You don't find peace and respect through the barrel of a gun or through acts of violence (hey...maybe this applies to our own government as well... or even most of the governments of the world...).



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 02:21 AM
link   
reply to post by DINSTAAR
 


Thanks for the lesson dude.

It's too bad ABout your friends' trey and matt.



Extra extra



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 02:31 AM
link   
reply to post by 517.101
 


Why?

He's just suggesting that people relax and stop taking everything so seriously. Its a good lesson to learn, especially when cultures clash over certain issues. If you're offended by the South Park incident, then shouldn't you just boycott the TV show? Or perhaps, not watch the television show at all? What better way to kill their advertising revenue than to stop watching, but by watching you're only feeding the wallets of the corporations that fund South Park, thereby giving them more incentive to keep pumping out episodes. Its also a choice to be offended by something you can easily avoid. By purposely putting yourself in a situation you know thats going to offend you, aren't you in the wrong? If you knew it was going to offend you, why did you even bother to venture into the situation? Sometimes it can't be avoided, I can understand someone getting upset, but when you have the power to cut yourself off from the very thing thats pissing you off so much, whose to blame? And since when did violence become necessary to appease your anger? Violence is a last ditch solution, and certainly shouldn't be used on something you could've avoided all together by changing the channel. Technically, you're responsible for your own outrage in this situation.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 02:38 AM
link   
reply to post by iamoverrated
 


I don't think so



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 02:55 AM
link   
reply to post by iamoverrated
 


agree totally, some people tend to 'cry over spilt milk' and end up causing much more damage, but i guess when you are a serf your always going feel under attack.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 05:57 AM
link   
What I don't understand is, Islam is supposed to ban ALL images of any of they're prophets. So why aren't they going after the Charleton Heston Moses, Or Jim Cavezial Jesus? It's hypocritical, and the hoopla and threats do much more harm to their cause than good. I would say they're lucky the only response to their thinly veiled threat was getting hacked. They could be brought up on charges. The most interesting part of this whole thing to me is hackers taking it upon themselves to mete out their own type of justice. Something to watch I think.

[edit on 25-4-2010 by siahchi]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 06:30 AM
link   
all credit goes to southpark for actually being the only show on msm that lets us all realise how silly and politically correct we are being when it comes to religion and pretty much anything else !

southpark doesnt pick on one thing they take to everyone equally !



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 08:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by Logarock

Originally posted by YehudasTheEnabler
did the people who did this think about there actions?this will only reinforce there beliefs.do you think it was done by a southpark fan?i think in the light of what has happened it probably was.seems like being a muslim is an easy target for jokes and such now after 9/11 happened,sorry to me it seems like most of the things they say about the west is true.whilst i am not a muslim i do respect there religion as i do every other whether or not i agree with what there saying.
it will be interesting to hear peoples views on this.




You're playing right into the fear here. Think about it.

[edit on 24-4-2010 by Logarock]


I will say again fighting fire with fire is pointless.Let the "exremists" push the boundrys,the whole of islam should not be mocked because of there views.The site clearly stated that this was not a threat,seemed more like an opinion to me.Has anyone been charged with threatening behaviour?this has been thrown out of all proportion by some on here.


Treat others how You wish to be treated.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 08:39 AM
link   
They deserve it, we all tolerate their behaviour way too much!

Its OK for them to say what they like about Jesus and every other religion but when the shoe is on the other foot they cant take what they give!



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 08:45 AM
link   
Another note-i see alot of you keep comparing the stuff southpark have done with other religious characters might i just point out one difference that it is islam thats under the close scrutiny of the west.Be rest assured if it was any of the other religions that was under scrutiny they too wouldnt take kindly to such a portral of one of there religious figures.



Edit-Treat others how You wish to be treated.


[edit on 25-4-2010 by YehudasTheEnabler]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 08:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by YehudasTheEnabler

Edit-Treat others how You wish to be treated.




Again that works both ways, they seem to treat anyone that disagrees with showing mohammad as an enemy that must be killed. I will never have any respect for anyone that kills another person because of a cartoon or threatens such action. I will also never have any respect for people who try and suppress free speech.

Consider for a moment what this group is doing, they are using violence or the promise of violence to stop someone expressing their belief, isn't this terrorism? If we allow these people to dictate what can and cannot be shown just because they threaten violence then i could get a ton of stuff i don't like banned and you would have to defend me in doing so.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 09:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984

Originally posted by YehudasTheEnabler

Edit-Treat others how You wish to be treated.




Again that works both ways, they seem to treat anyone that disagrees with showing mohammad as an enemy that must be killed. I will never have any respect for anyone that kills another person because of a cartoon or threatens such action. I will also never have any respect for people who try and suppress free speech.

Consider for a moment what this group is doing, they are using violence or the promise of violence to stop someone expressing their belief, isn't this terrorism? If we allow these people to dictate what can and cannot be shown just because they threaten violence then i could get a ton of stuff i don't like banned and you would have to defend me in doing so.



Sorry for me you are wrong,i will treat others how i wish to be treated irrelevant of how i am treated.A wise man once said"If someone slaps your right cheek let him slap your left cheek to".

edit- im getting bored of stating this,from where im sitting it didnt sound like a threat,more like this is one of the possible consequences of showing said programme.They clearly stated on there site that it wasnt a threat.

Treat others how You wish to be treated.

[edit on 25-4-2010 by YehudasTheEnabler]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 09:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by VendettaBeretta

Originally posted by robwerden
I think they deserved it.
The freedom of speech they enjoy with in our borders apparently does not apply to South Park in their opinion.


Did you actually read their supposed "threat"??? It wasn't a threat at all. It was a warning that others might take it into action.

Do you not realize that giving your opinion also counts as free speech? Or is free speech only important when you're white? Apparently it's a good idea to stifle free speech by using illegal and intrusive means. You only support things like that til it happens to you.

They supposed "threat" was:


We have to warn Matt and Trey that what they are doing is stupid and they will probably wind up like Theo van Gogh for airing this show," the posting said. A photo of van Gogh's body lying in the street was included with the original posting, which has been unavailable to some Web users since news of the item broke earlier this week. "This is not a threat, but a warning of the reality of what will likely happen to them.


Read more: www.thestate.com...


So when everybody was warning when Obama was running for president that he might get assassinated, that counts a threat??

Including when it comes from mainstream pundits?


Or when people on ATS say that there might be a false flag, that means that they are threatening to do a false flag themselves?

Your reasoning is very selective...

[edit on 23-4-2010 by VendettaBeretta]



what you just said ... i agree, and no im not a muslim, but i do know some and they are very normal people, yes they have different "rules" then us but they are people just like everyone else, some of them actually hate whats going on atm ...


come on if America invaded your country ... admit it ... you would be pretty angry about it.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 09:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ironclad
reply to post by Retrovertigo
 


Australia is screwed anyway..

Our Leader is a wee little Hobbit, who came home from his last visit to Obama with a Chocolate Brown covered nose.

We might as well be just another American state!!




hahaha that was awesome



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 10:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by siahchi
What I don't understand is, Islam is supposed to ban ALL images of any of they're prophets. So why aren't they going after the Charleton Heston Moses, Or Jim Cavezial Jesus?


Everything in due time.

Perhaps it's not way up on the priority, list. Let's see:

1. Annihilating Israel

2. Kick the U.S out of the Middle East

3. Take back Spain

4. Take over the world

5. Abolish democracy, freedom of speech, human rights and apply the sharia globally.

Nope, going after Charlton Heston didn't make it to the top 5 list.



Originally posted by YehudasTheEnabler
A wise man once said"If someone slaps your right cheek let him slap your left cheek to".


Ah, that rings a bell...

Monty Python, right?

www.youtube.com...

Why argue when you can sing?

www.youtube.com...

[edit on 25-4-2010 by Heliocentric]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 10:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by YehudasTheEnabler
edit- im getting bored of stating this,from where im sitting it didnt sound like a threat,more like this is one of the possible consequences of showing said programme.They clearly stated on there site that it wasnt a threat.

Treat others how You wish to be treated.

[edit on 25-4-2010 by YehudasTheEnabler]


I do treat others as i wish to be treated. They have every right to say the program should not have been aaired or should have been censored. They do not have the right to threaten violence. Now you of course claim they didn't do this but it's easy enough to read between the lines. They can't directly threaten because they will be arrested and so they talk about others committing the violence.

As i said earlier, consider for a moment if someone said to a police officer "someones going to break your legs if you don't leave me alone". Now this person hasn't said they will break the officers legs but of course the threat is very clear and that person would be arrested.

These people knew exactly what they were doing. The South Park people are well aware of the risks so why bother mentioning it? Other then to pressure them further.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 10:19 AM
link   
reply to post by Heliocentric
 


All muslims want these things?thats quite a statement and now i see you have decided to mock me,that wasnt what i meant and im sure you knew it.You just add that for laughs?



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 10:23 AM
link   
Let's just say that if South Park can mock the subject, so can I.

You don't have to take it personally, after all it's not your saying.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 10:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984

Originally posted by YehudasTheEnabler
edit- im getting bored of stating this,from where im sitting it didnt sound like a threat,more like this is one of the possible consequences of showing said programme.They clearly stated on there site that it wasnt a threat.

Treat others how You wish to be treated.

[edit on 25-4-2010 by YehudasTheEnabler]


I do treat others as i wish to be treated. They have every right to say the program should not have been aaired or should have been censored. They do not have the right to threaten violence. Now you of course claim they didn't do this but it's easy enough to read between the lines. They can't directly threaten because they will be arrested and so they talk about others committing the violence.

As i said earlier, consider for a moment if someone said to a police officer "someones going to break your legs if you don't leave me alone". Now this person hasn't said they will break the officers legs but of course the threat is very clear and that person would be arrested.

These people knew exactly what they were doing. The South Park people are well aware of the risks so why bother mentioning it? Other then to pressure them further.


Sorry i dont see that in the statement at all as i cleary stated,presumption is the mother of all screwups.

Treat others how You wish to be treated.





top topics
 
112
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join