posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 04:11 AM
reply to post by kingofmd
i must disagree - thats an absolutley crap write up
thier ` train of evidence ` is a veritable train wreck of sensationalist nonsence , that does not actually offer any evidence of substance
in no particular order :
they produce NO evidence what so ever for the existance of the photo before the 1960s .
even thier evidence for its 60s publication = ripleys believe it or not - a text not remotely committed to the truth - rather sensationalism [ spot a
the details of the photo are largely accademic anyway
if you believe the story you have to accept that thier was a Ptresaur flying around vicksburg in 1864 - and obviously - that one required 2 parents ,
and thus an unbroken genealogy back to the cretateous period
even the cop out that ` it was the last of its kind ` - does not diminish the question - where were its kin and ancestors from the mid 16th century
upto 1864 ????????????????
i guess the ` evil powers that be ` were exceedingly busy - even then sestroying all evidence - but wait - why would they destroy evidence of a
creature that was not officially found till 1870 ?
such are the illogical leaps you have to make to put any credence in this pic
and lastly - the blogosphere hates citicism - we [ ATS ] have already been denounced as disinfo - go figure