It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is the volcano 2012 itself?

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 22 2010 @ 10:19 PM
link   
i know it's only 2010, but compared to when the calendar was made, it pretty much is 2012.

if Katla goes off, the world is going to enter a new age. no doubt about it. and it will go off.




posted on Apr, 22 2010 @ 10:36 PM
link   
"In the past 1,000 years, all three known eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull have triggered subsequent Katla eruptions.[12] Following the 2010 eruptions, on 20 April 2010 Icelandic President Ólafur Grímsson said "the time for Katla to erupt is coming close ... we [Iceland] have prepared ... it is high time for European governments and airline authorities all over the world to start planning for the eventual Katla eruption""

en.wikipedia.org...

I thought you would be very interested to read this.

The documentation is all there.

So yeah, you are not the only person worried about this possibility.

[edit on 22-4-2010 by muzzleflash]



posted on Apr, 22 2010 @ 10:43 PM
link   
so what would happen if katia did go off?
global ice age?

[edit on 22-4-2010 by togetherwestand]



posted on Apr, 22 2010 @ 10:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by togetherwestand
so what would happen if katia did go off?
global ice age?

[edit on 22-4-2010 by togetherwestand]


No, not ice age, is a big volcano but not big enough, the Katla is a very regular volcano in fact and only affect his inmediate area.



posted on Apr, 22 2010 @ 10:53 PM
link   
Well, the other volcano shut down air traffic across northern Europe, so what do you think could happen if the bigger Katla erupts? Of course, if it disrupts air travel across the middle east, it might just put WWIII on hold. For a little while at least.



posted on Apr, 22 2010 @ 11:56 PM
link   
So what will happen if one or both actually erupt? How far will the direct devastation be - all the way to Australia for example? Will the ash block out the sun world-wide? If so, how long?

Anyone actually know the answers?



posted on Apr, 23 2010 @ 01:01 AM
link   
reply to post by Donnie Darko
 


we shouldn't be to afraid of katla. yes, it will be a major threat; but it will only be devastating if a combination of events take place. katla isn't the 'new age' its just something that scares a lot of people.

finding truth is different than just being scared. seems as though ats is 50-50 with these two types of thought.



posted on Apr, 29 2010 @ 04:37 AM
link   
there is probably an 80% chance it will erupt before November 1, 2010, given it's erupted within six months after the little one the past three times.



posted on Apr, 29 2010 @ 04:37 AM
link   
there is probably an 80% chance it will erupt before November 1, 2010, given it's erupted within six months after the little one the past three times.



posted on May, 2 2010 @ 11:33 AM
link   
Katla is more of an issue with Iceland. The economy there is in the tank so this could be really harsh. As for the rest of the world it is a nonissue in the long run. There are much more dangerous volcanoes in the world. Krakatoa and Tambora are two volcanoes that have been active and they caused big events. They are part of the ring of fire.

Vesuvius is closer to the center of Europe.

Mt Vesuvius

Mount Vesuvius is best known for its eruption in AD 79 that led to the destruction of the Roman cities of Pompeii and Herculaneum and the death of 10,000 to 25,000 people. It has erupted many times since and is today regarded as one of the most dangerous volcanoes in the world because of the population of 3,000,000 people living nearby and its tendency towards explosive (Plinian) eruptions.



new topics

top topics



 
2

log in

join