It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ultimate Defence

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 5 2004 @ 03:08 AM
link   
What do you think the least vulnerable place is if someone wants to kill you and they have any weaponry that exists today available to them?

I think being submerged in an ocean on a nuclear submarine is the safest...Well until you run out of food that is.




posted on Jun, 5 2004 @ 04:39 AM
link   
get real.....the moon is a good place too



posted on Jun, 5 2004 @ 04:54 AM
link   
NORAD under Mount Chyene. It can't be broken by anything made today.



posted on Jun, 5 2004 @ 04:54 PM
link   
Could you get through with a Tunnel Boring Machine or maybe Bunker Busters? Just an idea.



posted on Jun, 5 2004 @ 05:05 PM
link   
We don't need to think that complex. Osama bin Ladin might know some good answers on this one.

Basically it is safe everywhere you aren't expected to be and the people around you are trustworthy.

[Edited on 5-6-2004 by shoo]



posted on Jun, 5 2004 @ 05:12 PM
link   
Tell that to Saddam Hussein


Was he expected to be found in a tiny hole in the ground?

[Edited on 5/6/04 by Hyperen]



posted on Jun, 6 2004 @ 02:02 AM
link   
The Cheyenne Mountain Complex is NOT impervious to all known weapons or technologies. It is designed to to withstand near hits/misses with nuclear weapons. Now, with the advances in made in missile tageting, people can "Put Warheads On Foreheads". It will not withstand any direct hit (something withing one kiloyard). Now, being on a submarine during a nuclear attack is still somewhat dicey. It all depends on what kind of blast it is and how close it is. A surface or airburst will not do anything, while a nuclear depth charge is effective around 1-2 nautical miles. And, if worse comes to worse, a submarine can carry a lot of food.



posted on Jun, 6 2004 @ 02:22 AM
link   
From what I have been told, a deeply submerged submarine is almost impossible to detect so you'd have to depth charge the whole place!

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Jun, 6 2004 @ 07:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by Hyperen
From what I have been told, a deeply submerged submarine is almost impossible to detect so you'd have to depth charge the whole place!

www.abovetopsecret.com...


Let's start a new ATS project to afford one for the members



posted on Jun, 6 2004 @ 08:56 AM
link   
What do we need one for apart from protection from the Governments, men in black, aliens.



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join