reply to post by discl0sur3
Whoever makes these videos are complete morons.
I will address the first video only as the second has already been explained satisfactorily.
The name planet x is merely a generic term coined in 1906 by Percival Lowell to represent an unknown planet at the time.
That unknown planet X became Pluto.
From then on, the search for other planets x continued, which is why the 1983 newspaper article used the term planet x.
Funny that the ensuing investigation of this planet x isn't mentioned in the video, the beginnings of either poor research, or deliberate
The mystical planet x mentioned in the article turned out to be a group of distant galaxies and intergalactic cirrus.
The 1983 encyclopedia Britannica included a diagram that shows the path of pioneer 10 and 11 space probes.
Per the diagram, they were sent to get a triangulated fix on planet x
Incredibly, the diagram shows planet x as the "tenth planet" at 4.7 billion miles
It also shows the sun's binary twin "dead star" at 50 billion miles
Let's have a better look at the diagram:
Pioneer 10 and 11 are heading in opposite directions, so there is no triangulation.
the diagram is based on the hypothetical location of the tenth planet, no mention of planet x.
The dead star is at the same distance as the supposed mystery heavenly body
mentioned in the 1983 news article discussed
Again it was speculated to be an object but later discovered to be several objects.
This diagram came from the New Science and Invention Encyclopedia
, published in 1987, not Encyclopedia Britannica 1983.
Robert Sutton Harrington
Dr. Robert S. Harrington was obviously independent minded and inclined to discuss planet x
Unfortunately Dr. Harrington met with a suspicious and untimely death in 1993
The misinformation continues...Of course Harrington discussed planet x, he spent a good 30 years looking for it, he never found it because it
I will agree that Harrington's death was untimely, but not suspicious.
Esophageal cancer is very nasty and is largely inoperable.
The tests carried out in the ionosphere were carried out during a deep solar minimum, the findings show a possible correlation between solar dynamics
and it's effect on the atmosphere.
It would be interesting to see how the ionosphere looks now, with the sun coming out of it's sleep.
Real-time Magnetosphere Simulator
Clearly the video maker has no idea what he or she is looking at.
The real-time Magnetosphere Simulator simulates the speed and density of solar winds on our magnetosphere.
as the video maker so scientifically puts it, is indicating a drop in solar wind, not
a magnetic blast.
Long exposure photos
Without the date, direction, location of these photos, one cannot determine anything at all from these.
It's only proof of the video's maker's intention of making us see something that is not there.
USGS Worldwide deadly and destructive earthquakes between magnitudes 6 and 8
Since the only representation of this graph I can find is from www.thehorizonproject.com...
(buy their DVD now!!1!)
I can't say if the statistics are true or not.
Having said that, it is obvious that the destructiveness of a magnitude 6 earthquake in a populated area in 2000 will be more destructive than one in
There is a lot more infrastructure to be damaged.
Very unusual and inexplicable high tides are another symptom of the wobble
One news article from Georgia does not pertain a global wobble of the planet.
If such a thing were occurring, we would see the same tidal anomalies all over the world.
It would seem the creator of this video likes to dabble in the art of pseudo-science.
People like this disgust me, they lie to further their agenda, they deliberately ignore any evidence that contradicts their theories and have the gall
to call it truth
There is no truth here, just lies and misinformation to instigate fear and mistrust in those who don't fully understand what's going
Sitchin would be proud.
[edit on 6/5/10 by Chadwickus]