It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
PR: Are these children displaying any characteristics different from other children?
BF: These are children who can move objects across the room just by concentrating on them, or they can fill glasses of water just by looking at them. THEY'RE TELEPATHIC. You would almost think by knowing these children that they are half angelic or superhuman, but they're not. I think they are what we are growing into during the next few decades.
BF: The easiest way to mutate our DNA is through a virus. Consequently viruses are not necessarily bad. Viruses live only on living tissue. DNA viruses like Epstein Barr and the Herpes #6 change cellular structure. The retro virus HIV is not a DNA virus. Instead of mutating the body, it actually eats it up. Most people who go through this process and come out the other side have a new profession, a new way of thinking, or at least a starting of a new way of life.
Even though they may feel really sick, tired, or hopeless at times, it is a gift. They are being given a chance to change their DNA structure and their body into a lighter, healthier body that can see them into the next generation. The angels that are being seen are signs that we are shifting. As I understand it, WE HAVE UNTIL ABOUT 2012 TO COMPLETE THIS PROCESS.
Originally posted by Toelint
The Book Of Enoch There's copies all over the web, and easily attainable. One thing I gotta tell you though, when I read it, my impression was that the Nephilim were errant angels who sinned by falling in love with our women.
Hey, read it anyway. I didn't give away TOO MUCH of the plot.
[edit on 17-6-2004 by Toelint]
Originally posted by Undomiel
We were created as fully eternal beings ---> only. When the serpent spoke in the Garden it was to entice us to become DNA-based flesh and bone, to don "temporary skins" of DNA, when we had been without the need for error-ridden flesh and bone prior to that. Our eternal bodies became encased in these temporary faulty husks that experience aging and death and pain when once they did not. We were betrayed into putting our eternal selves into a genetic program that was faulty with a capital "F"!
We were not already in these temporary bodies when DNA was introduced - our bodies were still eternal bodies. It wasn't a rape, it was a betrayal with dire consequences. Like putting on a new outfit, we stepped into the faulty program (DNA) against God's commands, and found ourselves cursed by our own choices. When He said, "you will die if you eat of that tree", He wasn't kidding - He meant "You will experience pain and death if you choose that DNA, if you interface with that program!" This, however, does not mean we are all children of Lucifer nor that the Jews were all children of Lucifer, as Lucifer is not DNA. The serpent analogy is simply to emphasize that we put on skins in the form of DNA, in direct violation of God's original meaning for our existence. It also does not make Lucifer's involvement any less significant nor does it make him null and void as if he never existed nor does it mean he was simply a DNA strand, it simply implies this attribute is one of Lucifer's gifts to us, as part of God's creation. I envision it sort of like the spirit of Lucifer speaks from a 3-d like representation of a DNA molecule, and even though told not to interface with it, we still do, to our own temporary DNA prisons.
I got a sneakin' suspicion I know where your theory is heading. Might I add, I do believe we are going to disagree on this subject.
[edit on 6-6-2004 by Undomiel]
Originally posted by 7th_Chakra
Maybe the blackman ruled the planet for a while, then it was the caucasians turn, whos next?
Isn't the blackman the original human? After all is the word HU-MAN not representive of COLOR-MAN. (HUE-MAN = man of colour).
Are Humans and man-kind the same thing? sorry I am going a bit OT here.
Originally posted by Undomiel
I'll have to do a study on Elohiym as plural. I know the hebrews also used the plural form as a singular form as well for that particular word, but I would be remiss not to check into it further so I can comment on it at length.
BTW, check out this spiffy painting by Boris Vallejo of "Elijah" prophets of Baal. The painting is Gorgeous! But he doesn't show the intensity of the event, as it says the fire consumed everything on the altar, including the altar (which was much bigger than depicted here), and all the water in the trench around it as well. No doubt a spectacular light show.
[edit on 11-6-2004 by Undomiel]
BTW, are you trying to establish that the caucasian race were the wardens of the planet? I need to know this before we continue. (And also, before I forget, how do you think the native american indians fit into this?)